Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Monument a Colom, Barcelona, Spain - Jan 07.jpg
Appearance
- Reason
- It is a
complete(not strictly complete, but shows everything that can be isolated from background clutter - this shows a slightly more complete view, but is otherwise not as impressive) and detailed image of the monument to Christopher Columbus in Barcelona, Spain. - Articles this image appears in
- Columbus Monument, Barcelona
- Creator
- User:Diliff
- Support as nominator --Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 21:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I have the feeling, that you could edit the levels of this image some more. There is some space left on both sides of the histogram. Very nice image btw :). --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral The quality is so good, that I can't oppose it. However, the base of the monument is missing, which lowers the EV of this image imo. And since this is still Wikipedia... ;) --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 21:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- True, this is Wikipedia. Including the full base of the monument would have meant the composition was very messy (as I alluded to in the nom), but fair enough. If people oppose for that reason, I will accept it. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 07:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose It's a pity, it's such a gorgeous image, but cutting off the base (and not just a blank concrete base, there are further statues down there) really kills the EV as per above. Staxringold talkcontribs 23:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support Awesome quality shot. It even looks good on my (usually) lousy monitor! Even without the base, I think this has excellent EV since you can make out so much detail. Sure, I'd love to see the base too, but I don't think it's necessary. I really don't think it's worth the background clutter you'd need to get a complete shot. Makeemlighter (talk) 07:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral. Amazing detail at full res. Hard to support without the full monument, however. Kaldari (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted - no quorum. --jjron (talk) 11:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)