Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Litoria infrafrenata - Julatten.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2011 at 00:04:03 (UTC)

Support as nominator --JJ Harrison (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I hate how the danged infoboxes screw over lead photos (make them smaller). Looks much better here than there. And without the box conflict...TCO (reviews needed) 00:42, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support the back of the frog is blurry in the full size image, but otherwise this serves its purpose. Pine _{(was GreenPine)} ^talk 18:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Pine and I wish the subject was all in focus, but I like this image. ■ MMXX ^talk 08:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Been a while since we had a good amphibian, IIRC. A little bit flashed, but pretty good lighting control given the difficulty in getting frogs like this with moist skin in the dark. Taken in the wild? --jjron (talk) 10:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, its a wild frog. Because of weight limitations for my flight I couldn't carry elaborate lighting gear etc. JJ Harrison (talk) 05:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose light, DOF --ka ʁs tn 22:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- great work. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 11:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Litoria infrafrenata - Julatten.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 03:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]