Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ChinchillaMaria.jpg

ChinchillaMaria.jpg

I think this would be a good featuerd image, it's high-res, free-licence, good quality, and I also think Maria's pose (the chinchilla) is quite.... eye-catching.

Nominate and support. - ^R_H^e _o^d_t 12:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support same reasons as nomination. - Alan Frize 12:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, I'm afraid. Very cute photo, but not up to featured quality in my opinion. There's a very heavy shadow on the right-hand side. Also the upper piece of wood is rather distracting. Stephen Turner (Talk) 13:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Not a very striking/grabbing picture. --light darkness^(talk) 14:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per S. Turner. Not very focussed either. -- P199 15:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. While the pose is cute (those chinchillas can be quite adorable), it's not encyclopedic. Where's her tail? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 15:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as the owner of a pair of chinchillas, strikes me more as snapshot quality than FPC quality. Jumping chinchillas are more fun ;) [1] chowells 23:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose L e idi ot 07:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred - Adrian Pingstone
Oppose Nice chinchilla, but not featurable photography. The shadow, lighting, and composition leaves much to be desired. Certainly up to article quality, but not featured picture quality. NTK 03:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 02:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]