Wikipedia:Notability (people)/Poll

The purpose of this poll is to decide on what, if any, audience figure should be used for the inclusion of entertainers etc. on WP:BIO.

People still alive begines: "Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office."

Later a different standard is used: "Published authors, editors, and photographers who have written books with an audience of 5,000 or more or in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more" and "Recording musicians who have sold more than 5,000 albums, CDs, or similar recordings." It has been suggested in Talk that 5,000 is broadly too low and/or that figures themselves should not be employed.

Please note that any figure will not be requisite if other inclusion criteria are met. For example, peer-reviewed scientific theories or formulas are often included (given they are notable and verifiable) even if the audience viewing them is much less than 5,000.

In this poll vote if you vote for a figure being used (Options 1, 2 and 3) you may also make a secondary note if figures are discarded (Options 4 and 5)

Poll

Option 1 (Raise 2 to 10-fold 10 000 - 50 000)

Marskell 13:52, 10 September 2005 (UTC) About 20 000 perhaps. More than your average prof but not overly exclusionary.[reply]

Option 2 (Raise more than 10-fold, 50 000+)

Option 3 (5000 is sufficient)

Wikipedia is not paper, these people are successful enough if they can get 5000 people to pay for something they've done Nick Dillinger 11:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Option 4 (Remove figures and use "international, national or statewide/provincewide" audience" as the baseline throughout)

If we decide against figures I like this and perhaps be a bit more inclusionary by adding "large municipalities." Marskell 13:52, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]