Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Boston Bruins task force

Navigation
Main page	talk
Participants	talk
Popular pages	talk
Recognized content	talk
Projects Hockey Mountain talk Departments Article improvement talk Assessment talk Clean up talk Featured Topic Drive talk New articles talk Peer Review talk Requested articles talk Requested images talk Season Article Drive talk Task forces Boston Bruins talk Columbus Blue Jackets talk New Jersey Devils talk Philadelphia Flyers talk Pittsburgh Penguins talk Anaheim Ducks talk San Jose Sharks talk Seattle Kraken talk Vancouver Canucks talk Vegas Golden Knights talk College Hockey talk European Hockey talk Junior Hockey talk Women's Hockey talk Help/Manual of Style Navigational boxes talk Resources talk Structure talk Templates talk

Welcome to the Boston Bruins task force of WikiProject Ice Hockey!

Mission and Scope

Mission

The ultimate goal of this project is to improve all articles related to the Boston Bruins. The project currently has three long-term goals:

• Make Boston Bruins a Good Article (GA) and then a Featured Article (FA)
• Get all Bruins players who have played 1,000 games or more with the team to GA status
• Get all Bruins players who are featured on Hockey Mountain to GA

Scope

An article does fall under our scope if:

• It is a page on a Bruins list
• It is a page on a Bruins season
• It is a page on a Bruins player, past or present
• It is a page on a Bruins coach, past or present
• It is a page on a member of Bruins general managers, past or present
• It is a page on a notable Bruins broadcasting/radio channel, play-by-play announcer, or color commentator, past or present
• It is a page on a Bruins arena, past or present
• It is a page on a Stanley Cup Final the Bruins were in
• It is a page on an outdoor game the Bruins were in
• It is a page on a notable Bruins minor league affiliate, past or present
• It is a piece of pop culture or other topic relating to the Bruins

An article does not fall under our scope if:

• It is a page on a Bruins minor league affiliate player, regardless of whether he was signed to a contract with the Bruins
• It is a page on a minor league affiliate's coaching staff, ownership, or management

Progress

Main articles

Article	Status	Goal	Credit	Date
Boston Bruins	B	FA
History of the Boston Bruins	B	FA

Lists

List	Status	Goal	Credit	Date
List of Boston Bruins award winners	List	FL
List of Boston Bruins broadcasters	List	FL
List of Boston Bruins draft picks	List	FL
List of Boston Bruins general managers	List	FL
List of Boston Bruins head coaches	FL	FL	K. Annoyomous	July 28, 2008
List of Boston Bruins players	List	FL
List of Boston Bruins records	List	FL
List of Boston Bruins seasons	FL	FL	XR228	July 17, 2024

Arenas

Years	Arena	Status	Goal	Credit	Date
1924–1928	Boston Arena	C	GA
1928–1995	Boston Garden	B	GA
1995–present	TD Garden	B	GA

Outdoor games

Game	Status	Goal	Credit	Date
2010 NHL Winter Classic	Start	FA
2016 NHL Winter Classic	Start	GA
2019 NHL Winter Classic	Start	FA
NHL Outdoors at Lake Tahoe	Start	FA
2023 NHL Winter Classic	Start	FA

Stanley Cup Finals

Year	Result	Opponent	Status	Goal	Credit	Date
1927	Lost 2–0	OTT	Start	GA
1929	Won 2–0	NYR	Start	FA
1930	Lost 2–0	MTL	Start	GA
1939	Won 4–1	TOR	Start	FA
1941	Won 4–0	DET	Start	FA
1943	Lost 4–0	DET	Start	GA
1946	Lost 4–1	MTL	Start	GA
1953	Lost 4–1	MTL	Start	GA
1957	Lost 4–1	MTL	Start	GA
1958	Lost 4–2	MTL	Start	GA
1970	Won 4–0	STL	Start	FA
1972	Won 4–2	NYR	Start	FA
1974	Lost 4–2	PHI	Start	GA
1977	Lost 4–0	MTL	Start	GA
1978	Lost 4–2	MTL	Start	GA
1988	Lost 4–0	EDM	Start	GA
1990	Lost 4–1	EDM	Start	GA
2011	Won 4–3	VAN	B	FA
2013	Lost 4–2	CHI	B	GA
2019	Lost 4–3	STL	B	GA

Rivalries

Rivalry	Status	Goal	Credit	Date
Bruins–Canadiens rivalry	B	GA
Bruins–Maple Leafs rivalry	C	GA
Bruins–Flyers rivalry	Start	GA

Planned GTs

Boston Bruins

41 articles

History

Award winners

Broadcasters

Draft picks

Head coaches

General managers

Players

Records

Seasons

Boston Arena

Boston Garden

TD Garden

2010 Winter Classic

2016 Winter Classic

2019 Winter Classic

Outdoors at Lake Tahoe

2023 Winter Classic

1927 Stanley Cup Finals

1929 Stanley Cup Finals

1930 Stanley Cup Finals

1939 Stanley Cup Finals

1941 Stanley Cup Finals

1943 Stanley Cup Finals

1946 Stanley Cup Finals

1953 Stanley Cup Finals

1957 Stanley Cup Finals

1958 Stanley Cup Finals

1970 Stanley Cup Finals

1972 Stanley Cup Finals

1974 Stanley Cup Finals

1977 Stanley Cup Finals

1978 Stanley Cup Finals

1988 Stanley Cup Finals

1990 Stanley Cup Finals

2011 Stanley Cup Finals

2013 Stanley Cup Finals

2019 Stanley Cup Finals

Bruins–Canadiens rivalry

Bruins–Maple Leafs rivalry

Bruins–Flyers rivalry

Participants

Please add your name to the list of members if you wish to join the task force.

• Red Thunder (talk · contribs)
• Camanda (talk · contribs)
• jj137 (talk · contribs)
• RC-0722 (talk · contribs)
• tsurettejr (talk · contribs)
• RGTraynor (talk · contribs)
• Alrin (talk · contribs)
• Nsideris24 (talk · contribs)
• EOProductions (talk · contribs)
• The PIPE (talk · contribs)
• ThorOdinTyr (talk · contribs)
• DragonAnimators (talk · contribs)
• Brindille1 (talk · contribs)

Guidelines

We operate under WikiProject Ice Hockey and follow their guidelines.

Article quality

Statistics

Boston Bruins task force pages by quality
Quality
	Total
FA	4
FL	2
GA	19
B	34
C	81
Start	384
Stub	305
List	6
NA	5
Assessed	840
Total	840
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 4,214			Ω = 5.10

Examples

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Art Ross (as of October 2010)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of Boston Bruins head coaches (as of July 2008)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Jeremy Swayman (as of July 2022)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Phil Kessel (as of May 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	David Pastrňák (as of May 2024)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Matt Poitras (as of February 2024)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Mike Moffat (ice hockey) (as of February 2010)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of Boston Bruins draft picks

If you have any questions about articles or their quality, feel free to ask in this task force's talk page

Task force templates

New article

If there is a new article that meets the task force's criteria, then add bos=yes to the {{WikiProject Ice Hockey}} template:

Member

Use {{WikiProject Boston Bruins-Member}} to identify on user talk pages that you are a member of WikiProject Boston Bruins:

Use {{User WPBoston Bruins}} on your user page if you'd like a userbox:

This user is a member of the
Boston Bruins task force.

Inviting

To invite a member who you feel will help the project out, simply add {{WP BRUINS INVITE}} to their talk page:

Please accept this invite to join the Bruins WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Bruins. Simply click here to accept!

Barnstar

		The Boston Bruins Barnstar

The Boston Bruins Barnstar is the official Barnstar of the Boston Bruins task force. If you catch anyone adding meaningful content to Boston Bruins-related articles, slap this on their talk page.

Originally created by XR228 on August 3, 2024.