Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bahrain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:BAH)
"WP:BAH" redirects here. For other WikiProjects, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Bahamas and Wikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Welcome to WikiProject Bahrain! This group was formed to better organize articles on Bahrain in a spirit of cooperation. This group includes all articles related to Bahrain within its scope, its cities, geography, transportation, culture, history and so on. It aims to expand Wikipedia's resources on Bahrain in a fair and accurate manner. All of these articles should be contained within the Category:Bahrain or one of its subcategories.

Main goals

[edit]

Some of this project's main objectives are as follows:

  1. Help reduce orphaned articles by linking them with related articles
  2. Maintain neutrality of articles
  3. Improve existing articles, and help them attain a FA or a GA status
  4. Help create articles of significant notability
Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Manual of style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
 Some common sense, Do's and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't vandalize
  Don't get blocked

           

Collaboration

[edit]

Assessment

[edit]
Bahrain articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 1
GA 5 11 7 23
B 2 9 5 6 4 26
C 14 29 26 46 6 121
Start 18 60 150 333 40 601
Stub 19 66 546 88 719
List 2 8 15 47 14 86
Category 1,625 1,625
Disambig 1 1
File 5 5
Portal 1 1
Project 4 4
Redirect 3 9 114 126
Template 101 101
NA 1 104 105
Other 8 8
Assessed 36 130 277 995 1,963 152 3,553
Total 36 130 277 995 1,963 152 3,553
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 7,927 Ω = 5.32

WikiProject content quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron
(as of April 2019)
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology
(as of January 2024)
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing
(as of June 2018)
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ball
(as of September 2014)
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology)
(as of December 2014)
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements
{{WikiProject Bahrain| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale

[edit]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Bahrain. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are included as sections of the main Bahrain article. A reader who is not involved in the Bahrain field will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Bahrain
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Bahrain. The vast majority of users will be familiar with this topic. History of Bahrain
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of Bahrain. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Bahrain. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in the history of Bahrain will be rated in this level. Bahrain Polytechnic
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Bahrain. Few readers outside the Bahrain field or that are not Bahrain students may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the Bahrain, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most infrastructure of Bahrain. Jid Ali

New articles

[edit]

New article feed from User:AlexNewArtBot

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2024-12-13 19:44 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.

Articles needing cleanup

[edit]

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Article alerts

[edit]

Proposed deletions

  • 16 Dec 2024 – Esa Fadel (talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by LibStar (t · c): Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY.
  • 15 Dec 2024 – Alaa Binrajab (talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by LibStar (t · c): Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. Normally notable swimmers have at least competed in the Olympics.

Articles to be merged

Articles for creation

  • 14 Dec 2024 – Draft:Mustafa Jalali (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by CSugwiz (t · c) was declined by Ibjaja055 (t · c) on 15 Dec 2024

Departments

[edit]

Members

[edit]

Please edit here to add your user name.

Active members

[edit]

To join WikiProject Bahrain, edit this section and add your user page to the following table of members in alphabetical order. Members should also place member identification on their user page.

User Timestamp Interest(s)
Aliwiki 11:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC) Culture, History, Politics
Arabbi 02:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC) History, politics, geography, music, food, culture, and pretty much anything else to do with Bahrain.
Mohamed CJ (talk) 14:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Politics
Jassim A. Al-Zayani 16:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC) N/A
John Carter 00:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC) N/A
Lihaas 25 August 2011 (UTC) Politics and the liberation from state terrorism
Rehman(+) 02:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Energy, infrastructure and nature, and project-space maintenance.
Xajel 11:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC) Geography, Science, Food, Regional, Traditions, Energy.
Tandembay 8:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Science, Politics
Droodkin 21:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC) History, Geography, Sciences such as Biology and Chemistry, all Bahrain related topics
Joyson Prabhu 8:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Only History and Geography
Wustenfuchs 4:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC) Mainly politics
Hassan Bahrani 15:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC) Politics (will try), sports, history, geography, science such as Physics and Mathematics.
Desertroad (talk) 03:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC) Open
Sufyanxtreme 14:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC) politics, foreign relations, history, and improve pages with less information regarding bahrain.
CsikosLo 15:15, 29 June 2016 N/A
ChroniclerBH 20:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC) History, Geography, Politics and Sciences.
Matix X2 (talk) 12:30, 09 Dec 2019 (UTC) Medicine, Automobiles, Programming, History, Law & Policy, Bahraini history
Ahendra (talk) 12:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC) History, Bahrain Ethnic history, Bahraini history

Former members

[edit]

Thank you for your help! Please move your username back to the active list when you can participate again.

  1. Buaidh (talk · contribs) 18:00:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Member identification

[edit]

Members of WikiProject Bahrain should place one of the following lines of Wikitext on their user page to add it to Category:WikiProject Bahrain participants.

Wikitext userbox where used
[[Category:WikiProject Bahrain participants]] none linked pages
{{Template:User WikiProject Bahrain}}
This user is a participant in
WikiProject Bahrain.
 linked pages
{{Template:User WP Bahrain}}
This user participates in
WikiProject Bahrain.
 linked pages
{{Template:User WP Bahrain|invite}}
This user invites you to join
WikiProject Bahrain.
 linked pages

For other Bahrain user templates, see Category:Bahrain user templates.

Resources

[edit]

The following regularly contain information and news relevant to this subject in English.

See also

[edit]


Tools

[edit]
Main tool page: toolserver.org
  • Reflinks - Edits bare references - adds title/dates etc. to bare references
  • Checklinks - Edit and repair external links
  • Dab solver - Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
  • Peer reviewer - Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bahrain&oldid=1094326812"