Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lustralaustral: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Try,try and try again (talk) identified as unconstructive (HG) |
Undid revision 477946510 by Klilidiplomus (talk) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Shade.png|16px]] |
|||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
|||
{{SPIarchive notice|Lustralaustral}} |
|||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
|||
{{SPI case status|close}} |
|||
=====<big>20 February 2012</big>===== |
|||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Bsidethecside}} |
|||
Brand new account makes a few edits and then re-adds YouTube link to blocked sockmaster's page. I'm not too familiar with this particular sock, but the editing pattern is likely a new sock, so I blocked the account. Requesting confirmation and a sleeper check. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 20:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
|||
{{confirmed}} and rangeblocked. --[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 20:31, 20 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
Revision as of 20:44, 20 February 2012
