Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Highkeyflair: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: Hard-block would kill chances of compromising accounts too
m Replaced content with 'BOLLOCKS'
Line 1: Line 1:
BOLLOCKS
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
{{SPIarchive notice|Highkeyflair}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
===== <big>Report date March 5 2010, 15:41 (UTC)</big>=====

{{SPIcat}}

<!-- Please do not add a header here -->

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======
* {{checkuser|1=Panicday}}
* {{checkuser|1=Wh.beraji}}
* {{checkuser|1=Raise-again}}
* {{checkuser|1=Mdpclass}}
* {{checkuser|1=Arn789}}
* {{checkip|1=79.71.234.135}}
<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] </span>======
:Stupid troll using sleeper socks to get around semi-protection. Please empty the drawer. Thank you. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 15:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
::BTW, I notice a couple of the socks started their user page by giving out their passwords. Maybe just compromised accounts? I tried the Highkeyflair password but it did not work. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 15:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Ah, they're from [http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:uCh975LxtusJ:thewonderfulworldofwikipedia.blogspot.com/+Wh.beraji+Highkeyflair&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a here]. All blocked now. Still, a check might be useful. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 15:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
{{RFCU| B | No2ndletter | Endorse }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 15:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC) </small>
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##-->
<!--## Codeletters are:
A - arbcom ban/remedy evasion
B - Ongoing serious pattern vandalism
C - Vote fraud, please wait until after vote closes
D - 3RR with socks
E - Evasion of community based bans or blocks
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run -->
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##-->
{{tl|decline}} compromised accounts, all are blocked, and chances are they were being used by multiple people, may be worth monitoring [http://thewonderfulworldofwikipedia.blogspot.com/ http://thewonderfulworldofwikipedia.blogspot.com/] though. [[User:Spitfire|Spitfire]]<sup>[[User talk:Spitfire|Tally-ho!]]</sup> 15:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
:And yet they keep coming: {{user|Mdpclass}}. Checkuser would likely lead to more compromised accounts - how can that be bad? <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 16:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
{{endorse}} Very well, lets see if a checkuser can reveal any more compromised accounts. It may also be worth pointing this out at [[WP:AN|AN]], [[User:Spitfire|Spitfire]]<sup>[[User talk:Spitfire|Tally-ho!]]</sup> 18:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
----
:A hard-block of the underlying IP would put an end to this too, regardless of which account it wants to compromise. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 20:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:08, 5 March 2010

BOLLOCKS