Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thekohser/MAXDRAMA: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:06, 18 July 2009

User:Thekohser/MAXDRAMA

This userbox appears to be designed to undermine the very foundation of Wikipedia, article content. It is therefore inconsistent with the goals of the project. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Anybody who thinks that drama fostering is counter to the foundation of Wikipedia hasn't been paying much attention. More seriously, I don't see any problem with allowing this kind of satire in userspace. I also don't see how this undermines article content in any way. Steve Smith (talk) (formerly Sarcasticidealist) 00:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Harmless fun, and note to Jeff G, emember to use noinclude tag for templates and userboxes so to avoid putting all the transcluders in the same category to delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll "emember"[sic] that. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please behave, Jeff. Comments like this one are inappropriate. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep First it's very funny. Second, are we going to delete all humour related userboxes? Certainly not. Dr.K. logos 00:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Humor? What humor? I didn't see a humor tag. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some would argue that it's a valuable life skill to be able to recognize humour even when it's not explicitly labelled as such. Steve Smith (talk) (formerly Sarcasticidealist) 00:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These two diffs show no humor in the promotion of this infobox by previously banned User:Thekohser. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't show any overt humour either. But that doesn't stop it from being funny. Dr.K. logos 02:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) That's the problem with humour. It's an elusive beast. Not prone to tagging. You tag it, you kill it. Dr.K. logos 00:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: What Steve Smith said. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clear humour. Collect (talk) 01:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not only is this clear humor, but treating it like Serious Business can only be harmful to the principles espoused by the NODRAMA people. — Gavia immer (talk) 01:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. What Gavia said. Tagging this with an inappropriate speedy tag, and then taking up the community's time with an AfD, are much more likely to cause harm than this user box. -Pete (talk) 01:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an MfD. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to add "pointless nitpicking" to the list. -Pete (talk) 01:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Deleting just might fulfill point of counter protest. --I dream of horses (T) @ 02:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Jeff's mustache is a far better drama magnet than my pitiful MAXDRAMA box will ever be. Thank you, Jeff, for kicking off the first annual MAXDRAMA weekend in perfect, 1970's, Studio 54 style! -- Thekohser 03:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ::: Allow me to add "pointless nitpicking" to the list. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 01:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Comment:''' Deleting just might fulfill point of counter protest. --[[User:I dream of horses|I dream of horses]] ([[User talk:I dream of horses|T]]) @  02:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete.''' Jeff's [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Jeff_G._headshot.PNG mustache] is a far better drama magnet than my pitiful MAXDRAMA box will ever be.  Thank you, Jeff, for kicking off the first annual MAXDRAMA weekend in perfect, 1970's, [[Studio 54]] [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:LeisureSuitConvention4.jpg style]! -- [[User:Thekohser|Thekohser]] 03:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)