Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 64.140.27.125 (talk): Irrelevant. (TW) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
;Comments |
;Comments |
||
:Not a false positive. The filter correctly blocked your vandalism. —[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]]<sup>[[User talk:Bruce1ee|''talk'']]</sup> 13:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC) |
:Not a false positive. The filter correctly blocked your vandalism. —[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]]<sup>[[User talk:Bruce1ee|''talk'']]</sup> 13:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
rawr! |
Revision as of 19:21, 4 April 2014
This page lists all of the current outstanding false positive reports.
Click here to report a false positive
To report a false positive affecting an editor other than yourself, click here instead.
Dangingent
- Username
- Dangingent (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- [[]] (filter log)
- Description
- Date and time
- 11:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
- You are trying to create a page about a non-notable Youtube video - again. Please see your talkpage. Black Kite (talk) 11:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Loopylew87
- Username
- Loopylew87 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Roy micheal "hog" roberts (filter log)
- Description
- I was purely putting the actual facts of what happened, as what was put into Wikipedia was not the truth, I merely stated that actual events and a more detailed version.
- Date and time
- 15:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
- The filter was onjecting to the "kiss my ass" phrase (which wasn't sourced anyway). Black Kite (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Haifromellie
- Username
- Haifromellie (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- [[]] (filter log)
- Description
- Date and time
- 17:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
create a page but it kept saying stuff when i tried to save my progress.
- That's because you were adding complete nonsense. Black Kite (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
2.125.224.31
- Username
- 2.125.224.31 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Lorton Reformatory (filter log)
- Description
- adding to "see also" Rape Culture - 1975 Film - The film features the prison, inmates and the work of PAR (Prisoners Against Rape Inc) at the prison. The Prisoners were working with the DC Rape Crisis Centre.
- Date and time
- 19:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
- False positive - I have made the edit for you. Black Kite (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
75.171.218.169
- Username
- 75.171.218.169 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Talk:Energetically modified cement (filter log)
- Description
- There is no coherent explanation of the process in the article. I have been requested by several, to share my explanation on the Talk Page. I have done this, then I have critiqued my own work, again, as requested, to show how I am unable to properly reference things, as this is not a well referenced subject. This is ONLY intended to be on the Talk Page, as an aid to other editors' working on the article. I mention many times, in this post, that my explanation does not meet Wikipedia standards, as it is not referenced properly, and I draw conclusions in it, which I myself, point out. Again, this is ONLY meant to be posted on the Talk Page, as a possible aid to other editors working on this. I do not intend to use any of it in the article, itself, nor do I intend to edit this article. I am leaving this to others. It is a bit long, but I do not understand what, in anything that I have written, could possibly have triggered a filter. Perhaps you can help me out, here. If I have written something inappropriate in some fashion by accident, I will be more than happy to remove it, if you can point it out to me.
- Date and time
- 23:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
- Our apologies. We have fixed the issue affecting your edit, so please attempt it again. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. It posted just fine, this time.75.171.218.169 (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
72.39.122.224
- Username
- 72.39.122.224 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Occult Academy (filter log)
- Description
- Just changing the phrasing of some sentences to make them clearer. Didn't really change the content or meaning of anything that I am aware of.
- Date and time
- 04:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
Kruntappe
- Username
- Kruntappe (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Joe DiNapoli (filter log)
- Description
- Editing the page to comply with Wikipedia rules. Work in progress, will like an editor to review and supply feedback if there is more non compliance on which specific part.
- Date and time
- 11:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
John of Reading
- Username
- John of Reading (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Automation (filter log)
- Description
- I'm trying to revert spam, first with Twinkle then manually. It seems I cannot save the edit even after enclosing the archive.is part of the URL inside HTML comments? Or is the filter objecting to the edit summary?
- Date and time
- 11:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
There's no way to add text to an article that refers to archive.is. That's per design of the filter.—Kww(talk) 23:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'm experiencing the same issue. If there's project-wide consensus to never link to the archive.is website I guess it's OK to have the software disallow links to it, but why can't the text "archive.is" be included in an article if it's not a link, or even if it's inside a comment? SiBr4 (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
2601:E:9600:311:D69A:20FF:FE55:3BD0
- Username
- 2601:E:9600:311:D69A:20FF:FE55:3BD0 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- [[]] (filter log)
- Description
- Write a informative one-sentence summary about George Washington. I used information that I have learned in school. Some words might be in a foreign language. I am from Bangledick, a town in East Asia.
- Date and time
- 12:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comments
- Not a false positive. The filter correctly blocked your vandalism. —Bruce1eetalk 13:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
rawr!