Jump to content

Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 64.140.27.125 (talk): Irrelevant. (TW)
No edit summary
Line 130: Line 130:
;Comments
;Comments
:Not a false positive. The filter correctly blocked your vandalism. —[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]]<sup>[[User talk:Bruce1ee|''talk'']]</sup> 13:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
:Not a false positive. The filter correctly blocked your vandalism. —[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]]<sup>[[User talk:Bruce1ee|''talk'']]</sup> 13:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

rawr!

Revision as of 19:21, 4 April 2014

This page lists all of the current outstanding false positive reports.


Dangingent

Username
Dangingent (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
[[]] (filter log)
Description
Date and time
11:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Loopylew87

Username
Loopylew87 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
Roy micheal "hog" roberts (filter log)
Description
I was purely putting the actual facts of what happened, as what was put into Wikipedia was not the truth, I merely stated that actual events and a more detailed version.
Date and time
15:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Haifromellie

Username
Haifromellie (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
[[]] (filter log)
Description
Date and time
17:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

create a page but it kept saying stuff when i tried to save my progress.

2.125.224.31

Username
2.125.224.31 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
Lorton Reformatory (filter log)
Description
adding to "see also" Rape Culture - 1975 Film - The film features the prison, inmates and the work of PAR (Prisoners Against Rape Inc) at the prison. The Prisoners were working with the DC Rape Crisis Centre.
Date and time
19:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

75.171.218.169

Username
75.171.218.169 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
Talk:Energetically modified cement (filter log)
Description
There is no coherent explanation of the process in the article. I have been requested by several, to share my explanation on the Talk Page. I have done this, then I have critiqued my own work, again, as requested, to show how I am unable to properly reference things, as this is not a well referenced subject. This is ONLY intended to be on the Talk Page, as an aid to other editors' working on the article. I mention many times, in this post, that my explanation does not meet Wikipedia standards, as it is not referenced properly, and I draw conclusions in it, which I myself, point out. Again, this is ONLY meant to be posted on the Talk Page, as a possible aid to other editors working on this. I do not intend to use any of it in the article, itself, nor do I intend to edit this article. I am leaving this to others. It is a bit long, but I do not understand what, in anything that I have written, could possibly have triggered a filter. Perhaps you can help me out, here. If I have written something inappropriate in some fashion by accident, I will be more than happy to remove it, if you can point it out to me.
Date and time
23:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments
Our apologies. We have fixed the issue affecting your edit, so please attempt it again. -- King of 00:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. It posted just fine, this time.75.171.218.169 (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

72.39.122.224

Username
72.39.122.224 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
Occult Academy (filter log)
Description
Just changing the phrasing of some sentences to make them clearer. Didn't really change the content or meaning of anything that I am aware of.
Date and time
04:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Kruntappe

Username
Kruntappe (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
Joe DiNapoli (filter log)
Description
Editing the page to comply with Wikipedia rules. Work in progress, will like an editor to review and supply feedback if there is more non compliance on which specific part.
Date and time
11:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

John of Reading

Username
John of Reading (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
Automation (filter log)
Description
I'm trying to revert spam, first with Twinkle then manually. It seems I cannot save the edit even after enclosing the archive.is part of the URL inside HTML comments? Or is the filter objecting to the edit summary?
Date and time
11:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

There's no way to add text to an article that refers to archive.is. That's per design of the filter.—Kww(talk) 23:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm experiencing the same issue. If there's project-wide consensus to never link to the archive.is website I guess it's OK to have the software disallow links to it, but why can't the text "archive.is" be included in an article if it's not a link, or even if it's inside a comment? SiBr4 (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2601:E:9600:311:D69A:20FF:FE55:3BD0

Username
2601:E:9600:311:D69A:20FF:FE55:3BD0 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing
[[]] (filter log)
Description
Write a informative one-sentence summary about George Washington. I used information that I have learned in school. Some words might be in a foreign language. I am from Bangledick, a town in East Asia.
Date and time
12:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments
Not a false positive. The filter correctly blocked your vandalism. —Bruce1eetalk 13:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

rawr!