Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:14, 27 November 2010

This page lists all of the current outstanding false positive reports.

Edit filter management
Tags management

New archives

Sep-Oct 2010

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

188.25.174.118

Username: 188.25.174.118 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Laws regarding rape (filter log) (redo)
Description: WHY was my contribution repeatedly removed as vandalism?

The text I added is to the Laws regarding rape is:

Article 128 ^[1] is entitled Sexual violation defined. Article 128 (1) states that Sexual violation is the act of a person who rapes another person or has unlawful sexual connection with another person. Article 128 (2) defines rape as follows:

Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B's genitalia by person A's penis,—

(a) without person B's consent to the connection; and

(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.

Article 128 (3) outlaws "unlawful sexual connection" (which refers to sexual acts other than those described in 128 (2) - i.e without the penetration of genitalia - committed under the same circumstances of 128 (2).

Article 128 (4) makes it clear that spousal rape is illegal: "One person may be convicted of the sexual violation of another person at a time when they were married to each other."

The mere fact that a person allows sexual connection to be performed on them, does not automatically mean that they are legally consenting. If that person allows sexual connection due to coercion (eg, under force, threats or fear of force; when he/she is asleep or very intoxicated; if he/she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of a certain nature and degree; when he/she is mistaken about the partner's identity) than he/she is not legally consenting.

128A Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances ^[2]

(1) A person does not consent to sexual activity just because he or she does not protest or offer physical resistance to the activity.

(2) A person does not consent to sexual activity if he or she allows the activity because of—

(a) force applied to him or her or some other person; or

(b) the threat (express or implied) of the application of force to him or her or some other person; or

(c) the fear of the application of force to him or her or some other person.

(3) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is asleep or unconscious.

(4) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is so affected by alcohol or some other drug that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.

(5) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.

(6) One person does not consent to sexual activity with another person if he or she allows the sexual activity because he or she is mistaken about who the other person is.

(7) A person does not consent to an act of sexual activity if he or she allows the act because he or she is mistaken about its nature and quality. (8) This section does not limit the circumstances in which a person does not consent to sexual activity.

(9) For the purposes of this section,—

allows includes acquiesces in, submits to, participates in, and undertakes

sexual activity, in relation to a person, means—

(a) sexual connection with the person; or

(b) the doing on the person of an indecent act that, without the person's consent, would be an indecent assault of the person.

Attempted sexual violation and assault with intent to commit sexual violation are also punished (Article 129).^[3]

Article 129A ^[4] is entitled Sexual conduct with consent induced by certain threats and makes it illegal for a person to have sexual connection with another person or to do an indecent act on another person when the accused knows that the other person has been induced to consent to the connection/act by threat. However a person is guilty of this crime "if (and only if) he or she knows that the other person has been induced to consent" to the sexual connection/indecent act "by an express or implied threat". Subsection (5), (a), (b), (c) of this article defines "threat" for the purpose of this article.

Article 135 ^[5] outlaws Indecent assault. Article 138^[6] outlaws Sexual exploitation of person with significant impairment.

Date and time: 21:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Well, this certainly isn't vandalism. I'll contact one of the people in the Edit Filter Manager group. Endofskull (talk) 00:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Devin25505

Username: Devin25505 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Pickens County, Georgia (filter log) (redo)
Description: i wrote real statements and it would not let me do it
Date and time: 22:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Vandalism, user has been warned. —Soap— 22:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vasyl tkach

Username: Vasyl tkach (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Trembita (filter log) (redo)
Description: I was adding the external link to the sounds and pictures of trembita. Previously I was adding some links to the pages of other Ukrainian Music Instruments (there are samples and pictures of ALL of them)
Date and time: 07:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Adding the external link to the sounds and pictures of trembita. Previously I was adding some links to the pages of other Ukrainian Music Instruments

The filter has been appropriately warning you (but not stopping you) from linking to your own website. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

216.249.72.222

Username: 216.249.72.222 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): SMD (filter log) (redo)
Description: Inform people what the acronym SMD means in graffiti.
Date and time: 05:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Yes, you could call it a false positive, but we would not have an entry like that on the SMD page anyway. It's similar to an attempt a few weeks ago to get "Third Tier Toilet" on the TTT page. It wasn't removed because it was obscene, it was removed because it doesn't point to a Wikipedia article or a misspelling of one. —Soap— 11:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weatherextremes

Username: Weatherextremes (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Catenanuova (filter log) (redo)
Description

While spending an awful lot of time editing this article I received what I believe is a false positive for Vandalism.I have followed all the given instructions by adding the proper references and by giving edit summaries from the time I was warned onwards.Since I believed that someone was altering my text I missed a few times the edit summaries and have quicly asked the help of two administrators for content and dispute resolution before receiving the warning.Thank you

The only entries I see on your filter log are from July, and in any case, that filter was designed to be very wide-open and catch false positives on purpose. The only one triggering the edit filter is Amending (talk · contribs). —Soap— 15:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So what am I supposed to do to properly add my references?I have asked both for content and dispute resolution with Amending from two administators but still have not heard anything

You should be patient; most Wikipedia editors are not online at all hours of the day, and he may not have seen your message yet. Disputes such as these can rarely be solved by just one person, anyway, and generally can't be solved in one day either. Likewise I can't promise to faithfully watch this page either. You both should read the policies at WP:3RR which forbid a user from reverting a page to his preferred version more than three times per day; both of you are in violation of that rule now and could be blocked if you continue. You should instead try to talk to him on the talk page of the article (talk:Catenanuova); if he refuses to communicate then would be a more appropriate time to take action.

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the 3RR rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours.

I will be giving an identical warning to Amending. —Soap— 16:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is the wording basically.I have presented my case all over Europe and in Italy in various meteorological forums that he participated.It has been months now and nothing has changed,so i can not take him in good faith.I am discussing and refuting in the discussion page but still the article remains the same

24.255.210.137

Username: 24.255.210.137 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Wilbur Sweatman (filter log) (redo)
Description: I wanted to delete this article that was a complete fabrication of an actual ragtime musician of the early 20th century. Everything in the article was made up.
Date and time: 06:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

It was a vandalized version of the original article. I've fixed it now. —Soap— 09:07, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, please note that the way to delete an article isn't by blanking it. Please read our deletion policy to see how to request deletion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RomeEonBmbo

Username: RomeEonBmbo (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): User:RomeEonBmbo (filter log) (redo)
Description: Tried to enter in a self-made userbox. Here is the code: {{userbox | id = HAD | id-s = 14 | id-c = #2F2F2F | id-fc = #FF0000 | info = James while John had (repeated 11 times) a better effect on the teacher | info-c = #D2B48C | info-s = 7 | info-fc = #191970 | border-c = #007FFF | border-s = 2 }}; I see no reason why this was disallowed. When I tried to report this, another false positive showed up when I was displaying the original example.
Date and time: 20:03, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

It thinks "had had had...." is vandalism because it's 11 of the same word in a row. But it should be okay now. —Soap— 22:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did the edit for you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stealth eagle18

Username: Stealth eagle18 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Battle of Midway (filter log) (redo)
Description: There was false information that needed to be corrected that appears to be true that i was trying to fix the blatent error. I am a history buff so I know that i am editing and placing in correct information
Date and time: 16:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

This is a rare error that happens sometimes when a lot of users edit a page at the same time. I don't really know how to explain it. It should self-resolve almost instantly when it does happen though. Sorry for the inconvenience. —Soap— 17:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

216.186.76.24

Username: 216.186.76.24 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): History of Switzerland (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 16:29, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

User is blocked for 24h for repeated attempted vandalism on History of Switzerland. —Soap— 17:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ABrock

Username: ABrock (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Le_Petit_Tourette (filter log) (redo)
Description: Tried to add Chris Hansen's reaction to his appearance on South Park. Many other South Park Episode pages have applicable celebrity reactions listed. This reaction comes a speech given at Saint Louis University. Information comes from an eyewitness account. Also tried to reference a supporting interview posted on youtube he gave to campus news shortly afterward.
Date and time: 23:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

It would not be triggered if you typed the name of the youtube account as SLU-TV since it would not then contain the substring "slut". It does seem that they usually use the dash in their name on their website. —Soap— 23:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

71.226.44.29

Username: 71.226.44.29 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): hippopotamus (filter log) (redo)
Description: I was adding facts that helped other readers more clearly understand the very fascinating animal.
Date and time: 03:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

This looks like vandalism to me. If not please explain what you were doing. —Soap— 10:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

206.130.132.142

Username: 206.130.132.142 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): forbidden city (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 04:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

A vandal. —Soap— 10:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

206.176.117.85

Username: 206.176.117.85 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 15:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

tHIS ISNT FAIR MY EDIT WAS VERY CONSTRUCTIVE>:( GRRR YOU DAMN FILTER

Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

209.250.163.174

Username: 209.250.163.174 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Betamax (filter log) (redo)
Description: hi
Date and time: 16:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

150.101.229.164

Username: 150.101.229.164 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Arthritis Foundation (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 19:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

i was trying to write that arthritis is a good foundation which helps many arthritis victims by giving them the best of life. : )

Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

163.150.204.213

Username: 163.150.204.213 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Miguel Cotto (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 20:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

67.79.98.9

Username: 67.79.98.9 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Cheetos (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 00:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Obvious vandalism; not a false positive. Reported user to WP:AIV. Endofskull (talk) 03:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheWiseOwl112

Username: TheWiseOwl112 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): One Time (filter log) (redo)
Description: DO YOU LIEK SOUP?!
Date and time: 02:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Obvious vandalism, even on this report. I discovered that he's a vandal. If you look at his talk page history, you can see that he did a personal attack at a user. I reported him to AIV, since he seems to be a vandalism only account. Endofskull (talk) 03:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

75.94.126.10

Username: 75.94.126.10 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Capybara (filter log) (redo)
Description: TRUE INFO! I SWEAR!
Date and time: 02:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Obvious vandalism; not a false positive. Endofskull (talk) 03:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maudet

Username: Maudet (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Irish Moutarde (filter log) (redo)
Description: I created a page yesterday about this band (Irish Moutarde). This article is now being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. I tried to edit the page today to add the info and the references I didn't have time to add yesterday and cannot add them, because I get the following message: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error. " Thanks
Date and time: 15:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Does it have to be spelled COCK Matin? As in, with all capitals? This filter specifically only looks for incidences of capitalized obscene words, such as this. If you spelled it Cock it would not be trapped. As an aside, there is no rule preventing you from editing a page more than 3 times in a day. WP:3RR specifically refers to edit wars, when attempting to undo the work of someone else. However some of the references you've been adding will likely carry little weight in an AfD, such as the radio interview, and a Facebook page. But this is not to say you cannot add them, or add anything else to the article that's true. —Soap— 17:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

134.253.26.12

Username: 134.253.26.12 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Template:University of Rio grande (filter log) (redo)
Description: I am attempting to redirect Template:University of Rio grande to Template:University of Rio Grande and was blocked by the edit filter. This is a simple capitalisation error, which caused the template to be forked.
Date and time: 16:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

There is a filter in place to limit the number of redirects that a user can perform in a given amount of time, to prevent massive changes from going unnoticed. If you not averse to registering an account, you could do so and be free of the problem and other similar ones, since many of these limitations are only applied to users editing from anonymous IP addresses. —Soap— 16:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I am not able to do this, but it is good to know that I can just throttle my edits. Thanks! 134.253.26.12 (talk) 18:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

207.163.1.200

Username: 207.163.1.200 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Great Fear (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 17:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Unexplained deletion of a big section of an article will always trip this trigger; you need to explain why you deleted this passage. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:33, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

63.227.190.54

Username: 63.227.190.54 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): History of mobile phones (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 17:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

193.253.141.82

Username: 193.253.141.82 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Saurashtra language (filter log) (redo)
Description: I just modified "theses people" > "these peoples".

I can't see the full page, then I don't how I could remove all what the warning says.

Date and time: 19:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

I assume this is a mistake; the filter shows you removing everything after the second paragraph. While there are some software platforms out there that could not handle large pages, this doesn't look like an example of that. If it is, though, then you won't be able to edit pretty much anything. Have you edited Wikipedia from this system before? —Soap— 19:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calligraphers

Username: Calligraphers (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Fastbacks (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 20:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Spamusername account was blocked when attempting to insert spamlinks to website for "Calligraphers", a band. Excellent work, filter writers! --Orange Mike | Talk 20:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bawolff

Username: Bawolff (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Project:Sandbox (filter log) (redo)
Description: (Note: I was not logged in at the time). I was just curious on how a template was implemented, so I substituted it into the sandbox. Well admittedly I was inserting non-sense, I don't think the edit filter should be triggered on the Sandbox, being the sandbox and all. No big issue though. Cheers.
Date and time: 20:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

This happens almost every day. Your recommendation has been brought up before, possibly more than once. Although a few filters do specifically exclude the Sandbox, because of the way the edit filter runs, to exempt all of them would require writing the exemption code independently on every filter, which would impede the performance of all of them. If there were a "skip all" function on the edit filter, it would be great, but that doesn't exist yet.—Soap— 20:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

note this is a templated message, so some of it may sound odd. But I'm not using a template because I'm ignoring you, just because it's essentially unsolvable right now unless we were to run the same code 100+ times on every edit to exempt the sandboxes. —Soap— 20:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ledbury Portal

Username: Ledbury Portal (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Citizen journalism (filter log) (redo)
Description: I was putting back a link to the Ledbury Portal which had been removed by someone. The Ledbury Portal is a citizen journalist website serving Ledbury
Date and time: 14:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: In my opinion, not a false positive. Your name matches the URL of the site added. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:44, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

71.8.70.1

Username: 71.8.70.1 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): GDiaper (filter log) (redo)
Description: I was trying to revert the last edit which made the page much more of an advertisement than an actual article. The article prior to this last edit had been a much more professional and less biased page.
Date and time: 21:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Thanks, I've done the edit for now. When I get some more time (I've been busier than usual lately) I'll try to work out a version of the filter that exempts articles about diapers. It's not as easy as it looks because of the way the filter is coded ... which, while it may seem somewhat difficult, it seems to be quite an improvement over the previous version of the filter. As for why the filter was stopping you in the first place, it was because of the word "poop" in the edit, which, believe it or not, is more common in vandal edits than similar words generally considered less mild. —Soap— 00:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

24.13.203.95

Username: 24.13.203.95 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Wot a Night (filter log) (redo)
Description: "Removed Wot a Night link to closed YouTube account"
Date and time: 00:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

I think you just made a mistake. In the future please check to make sure you're not accidentally removing content beyond the parts you intended to. —Soap— 01:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

98.83.184.32

Username: 98.83.184.32 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Machinima.com (filter log) (redo)
Description: Website/Company

I was adding an article for Machinima Respawn

Date and time: 01:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

I think this content is not necessary, but it's not up to me to take sides in questions like this, so I'll just say it will go through if you don't mention the name with the word SHIT (capitalized), or preferably any of the screen names at all. —Soap— 10:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The clarkisaaaan

Username: The clarkisaaaan (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Paralowie, South Australia (filter log) (redo)
Description

Added text

===THE RARGE===

The RARGE is a social club located on the corner of whites and burton rds in the centre of paralowie. Its beginings began as a humble garage out the back of the Clarkson residence. The Rarge was opened as just a local hangout where the founder Daniel Clarkson and a few of his close friends could hang out and have fun and enjoy the weekends. Then the boys thought they'd share there lucky gift and local hangout with the rest of the community and encouraged all people in the suburb of paralowie to come and share the fun. The Rarge was first erected in 1996 but wasn't actually opened as 'The Rarge' untill 2001. the rarge has been a nice safe environment for people to socialise and have fun throughout the years with no hassles or dramas and is a loyal hangout for the true locals and will go down through the years to come. At the start it only started with around 10 member with a few regulars stopping by, at this moment The Rarge memberships are around 500+ with only a very select few getting the honnor of 'life membership'..... while walking around in paralowie if you ask a friendly face(over the age of 18) they will gladly direct you in the right direction of The Rarge and will share some of the great stories and expiriences that they've had there..... The atmosphere is very relaxed and all people that act in a responsible manner are more than welcome there and will be greated with a smile and a hearty handshake from the founder Daniel Clarkson himself!..... Only 1 rule at the Rarge ALWAYS RESPECT THE RARGE AND ITS MEMBERS!!!!!!In conclusion The Rarge is a very friendly place and there is a novel in the works being written by the founder Daniel Clarkson about the history of The Rarge called 'If These Walls Could Talk: The Story Of The Rarge!'

was just adding a place of significance in paralowie south australia

Date and time: 07:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

You can try making the change again without all the exclamation marks, because the exclamation marks have no relevance or improvement to the article, and the filter stopped you because of your addition of "!!!!!". Minima c (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Killerburke

Username: Killerburke (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Alex skelly (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 18:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Not a false positive. →Gƒoley Four (GSV) 18:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

91.106.220.31

Username: 91.106.220.31 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Geyser (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 22:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

A vandal, trying to vandalize Geyser. —Soap— 22:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vaehne

Username: Vaehne (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Satan Saves! (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 09:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: This is the result of your repeated links to http://www.myspace.com/VexVaehne. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

99.238.25.94

Username: 99.238.25.94 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Act Respecting the Future of Quebec (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 14:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

quebec people like bananas just like the snapping turtle and painted turtle and lots more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

174.59.153.253

Username: 174.59.153.253 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Talk:Juke Box Hero (filter log) (redo)
Description: was trying to add amplifying information to an unsourced statement in the Discussion section of the article involving "Juke Box Hero"
Date and time: 23:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Thanks for reporting this, I've fixed it now. The edit filter thought that the string of "Juke was a variant of an offensive word, which is much too loose a match to be usable I think.—Soap— 23:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike5906

Username: Mike5906 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Epic Rage Guy (filter log) (redo)
Description: Creating a page for the Internet meme "Epic Rage Guy".
Date and time: 05:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

"FFFUUUU" was on the list of watch words because it is often used for vandalism. I've removed it for now, but it may be added back in later. Even then, though, it won't stop an edit if the phrase is already present on a line. —Soap— 11:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

92.83.254.222

Username: 92.83.254.222 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Krypton (band) (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 17:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Without checking the edit filter itself, the edit appears innocuous, although the format changes seem inappropriate. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't boldface band members like that. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

198.236.235.2

Username: 198.236.235.2 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Newberg High School (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 22:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

67.77.68.82

Username: 67.77.68.82 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Clarke's three laws (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 23:23, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

207.32.9.143

Username: 207.32.9.143 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Sam McGuffie (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 23:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

71.63.151.219

Username: 71.63.151.219 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Gamer (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 00:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

All recent hits that I can see are vandalism, e.g. Special:AbuseLog/3774892.—Soap— 00:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

18.111.108.139

Username: 18.111.108.139 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Shueisha (filter log) (redo)
Description: I was trying to remove a 3-word line of complete bullshit.
Date and time: 03:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Even in an edit summary, you should avoid obscenities unless necessary (e.g. if the content of the edit is referring to an obscenity). Even in these cases you should not capitalize it as this makes the edit stand out from the others unnecessarily. —Soap— 12:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stevenbrumley

Username: Stevenbrumley (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Interview with the Vampire (filter log) (redo)
Description: Add a film review by Norm MacDonald issued on the show Saturday Night Live
Date and time: 12:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: You stripped it of substantive content, and attempted to replace that with a throwaway line from a comedy sketch show. The filter did just what it should. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georgemn1991

Username: Georgemn1991 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Adam Holloway (filter log) (redo)
Description: adam afriyie

Adding a relevant external link

Date and time: 14:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

This is better handled by people familiar with the articles, I think; it certainly isn't a false positive though because you really are adding the same link to a series of articles, and that is what the filter is for. Legitimate or not, this is not a common practice on Wikipedia. —Soap— 17:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JAVADO

Username: JAVADO (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Samaná Peninsula (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 14:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

As above, this is better handled by people familiar with the articles. Adding links to a series of articles is often a sign of attempted promotional activity and even if the link is "good" in and of itself it is not usually a good idea. If you only add it to the Samaná article I think you should be OK because another user has looked at that link and seems to approve of it. —Soap— 17:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there is nothing to indicate that this is a reliable source in any way; seems to me that the filter did a good job of preventing a spamlink from being inserted. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

174.118.44.238

Username: 174.118.44.238 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): My name is erella ganon. i was at the erella ganon wiki page (filter log) (redo)
Description: I was putting a link to a documentary about me and an article from the toronto star from last week with my photo.
Date and time: 15:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Sorry, you will need to use the full URL, not a tinyurl, as tinyurl and other similar sites have been used to hide links to malware sites or copyright violations. —Soap— 15:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volleyballisbomb

Username: Volleyballisbomb (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): [[]] (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 17:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Simply don't add " :) " into the text. thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 17:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]; And don't add meaningless text like "the iPod is extremly awesome" either; it has no place here. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

202.58.180.202

Username: 202.58.180.202 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): [[]] (filter log) (redo)
Description: I TRIED TO ERASE FALSE INFORMATION BUT TO FIND OUT I COULDNT DO IT
Date and time: 04:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

A vandal; user has been warned. —Soap— 04:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

87.36.85.137

Username: 87.36.85.137 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): [[]] (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 09:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Apparent vandalism.—Soap— 15:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

94.30.14.48

Username: 94.30.14.48 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Atul Kochhar (filter log) (redo)
Description: I was trying to update Atul's Biography, on behalf of his agent James Bulmer, with his recent tv series commissioned this year, Atul's Malaysia'.
Date and time: 11:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

The edit will go through now, but I won't do it myself because the content is unreferenced. If you add it like this it may be removed by another editor. —Soap— 13:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

62.20.92.11

Username: 62.20.92.11 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): [[]] (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 13:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Apparent vandalism.—Soap— 14:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neptunecanada

Username: Neptunecanada (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): brittlestar (filter log) (redo)
Description: trying to link a video showing brittlestars crawling around on the seafloor, fighting over a scrap of dead shrimp
Date and time: 20:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Not a false positive, you were really adding links to multiple articles. This is strongly discouraged, even if the links are relevant to the article and free of commercial content, and worse if they aren't. —Soap— 22:51, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matthewoliver

Username: Matthewoliver (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Wallace Rowling (filter log) (redo)
Description: Adding a link to a newly published biography; and yes, I added 4 links in a row to 4 newly published biographies (David Lange, Arthur Lydiard and Douglas Lilburn) and I hope to add more as we publish more.
Date and time: 00:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

71.79.64.65

Username: 71.79.64.65 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Saint Francis Seraph Church (filter log) (redo)
Description: This page had a big "Success Story" section that I guess was copied from somewhere else, so I removed it (http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Saint_Francis_Seraph_Church&diff=398919610&oldid=385191503), but it tagged me with a "blanking" tag. Even if it wasn't copied from somewhere else, it didn't have any references and wasn't written like an encyclopedia article: I removed it because I really think the article is better without it.
Date and time: 05:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: It appears as though your edit has indeed gone through, so no harm done. The filter normally tags whenever an IP or new account removes a large amount of text, but otherwise does not hamper the edit (since there may be a legitimate reason for a new user to make the edit). —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.!)} 05:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Udafood

Username: Udafood (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): the office (filter log) (redo)
Description: edit the page
Date and time: 06:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments: Filter working as intended. I'd advise the admins to keep an eye on this user. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.!)} 06:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yiyrewjkhfeuirfhr

67.168.103.161

Username: 67.168.103.161 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): I was fixing a messed up spelling and false information (filter log) (redo)
Description: fix spelling and false info
Date and time: 06:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Kc98223

Username: Kc98223 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): Matthew Schools (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 06:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

79.173.207.45

Username: 79.173.207.45 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): [[]] (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 09:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

fake mind frekin

Vanhalen10

Username: Vanhalen10 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink): [[]] (filter log) (redo)
Description
Date and time: 01:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments

dam u

[1] ttp://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329051.html#DLM329051

[2] ttp://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329057.html

[3] ttp://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329070.html

[4] ttp://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329075.html

[5] ttp://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329219.html

[6] ttp://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329227.html

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

@@ Line 835: / Line 835: @@
 ;Comments
 <!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! -->
+== fake mind frekin ==
+===Vanhalen10===
+;Username
+: {{user|Vanhalen10}} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode:Vanhalen10}}|NAME=filter log}})
+;Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
+: [[]] ({{plainlinks|URL=http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode:}}|NAME=filter log}}) ({{plainlink|url=http://www.toolserver.org/~mpdelbuono/ef_redo.php?user={{urlencode:Vanhalen10}}&timestamp=20101127011406|name=redo}})
+;Description
+:
+;Date and time
+: 01:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
+;Comments
+<!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! -->
+dam u