Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 August 20

August 20

Category:Musical groups from Louisiana (U.S. state)

Suggest merging Category:Musical groups from Louisiana (U.S. state) to Category:Musical groups from Louisiana

Nominator's rationale: Simple duplication. Chubbles (talk) 00:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Suggest merging I made the LA(US State) page I apologize, I didn't know there was another page. I will do the merger myself. Sorry!Ashfromthepast

Delete All of the artist have been moved. I can't figure out how to delete the page.--Ashfromthepast

Category:Motherboards with built-in keyboards

Propose renaming Category:Motherboards with built-in keyboards to Category:Computers with built-in keyboards

Nominator's rationale: Procedural nom. Quoting from the talk page:

"I'd suggest renaming this category - at least - it should be 'computers with built-in keyboards'

The keyboard is not built in to the motherboard in any of these cases, but is a seperate component in the case.

However - I don't see the rationale for the category at all. --Speedevil (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)" NW (Talk) 00:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Chancellor of Delaware

• Merge Category:Chancellor of Delaware to Category:Chancellors of Delaware #3 [pluralization fix] — Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 23:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
  • The problem with this merge is that there are two subsets of Category:Chancellors of Delaware and this is one of them, the other being Category:Vice Chancellors of Delaware. If merged the Vice Chancellors will again be orphaned hierarchically. I do not recommend the merge unless a satisfactory way can be found to solve the problem noted. stilltim (talk) 17:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
    • Why not just keep the Vice Chancellors a subcategory of the Chancellors (as it is now), and include the bio articles of chancellor individuals in Category:Chancellors of Delaware? Or we could link the categories with template:CatRel. Having Category:Chancellor of Delaware doesn't make a lot of sense—it's just an unnecessary layer unless we have a lot of articles about the position itself rather than the people who have held the position. And if it contains bio articles (which is does now), it is clearly misnamed per criterion #3. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 21:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• Support merge and comment I see no need for the separate Category:Chancellor of Delaware. "Chancellor" and "Vice Chancellor" are simply titles for the judges of the Delaware Court of Chancery. Now, if you were going to rename the category to something like Category:Delaware Court of Chancery judges, that would be a little more justifiable, as this title would be a bit clearer to readers who are not trained in law. --Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 04:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
• Moved from speedy rename section at this point. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Archaeological sites in the Arab League

Category:Archaeological sites in the Arab League - Template:Lc1

Nominator's rationale: Delete. An unnecessary layer of categorization above above the country-level subcategories of Category:Archaeological sites by country. This is like having Category:Archaeological sites in La Francophonie—not a terribly useful mix of archaeology/history and modern linguistic/political relations. (I've found the articles being added are already in the appropriate by-country subcategory. Where this has not been the case I've tried to subcategorize them into the appropriate country, but more are being added.) Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Delete.being the creator of this category, i agree with your opinion, and now do believe that their is no necessity for this Category anymore. Arab League User (talk) 00:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)