Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind Polish: Master Hubbard's Special Reserve: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
Illuminatus8 (talk | contribs) ←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]]</font></sub> 07:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Mind Polish: Master Hubbard's Special Reserve]]=== |
|||
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind Polish: Master Hubbard's Special Reserve}}</ul></div> |
|||
:{{la|Mind Polish: Master Hubbard's Special Reserve}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind Polish: Master Hubbard's Special Reserve|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 August 13#{{anchorencode:Mind Polish: Master Hubbard's Special Reserve}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mind_Polish:_Master_Hubbard%27s_Special_Reserve Stats]</span>) |
|||
:({{Find sources|Mind Polish: Master Hubbard's Special Reserve}}) |
|||
Article is about a non-notable Z-budget film that does not even appear to have been reviewed or gained any notice whatsoever. [[User:Laval|Laval]] ([[User talk:Laval|talk]]) 07:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:{{#if:yes|<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. <small><font face="arial">[[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup></font></small> 07:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)</small>|{{error|This [[template:deletion sorting|template]] must be [[WP:SUBST|substituted]]!}}}} |
|||
*'''Delete''' for failing [[WP:NF]]. It exists. It screened. It won an award at a festival. But apart from that no media sources have taken notice of this comedy short. All I can find are viewer responses and numerous non-rs.[http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Mind+Polish%3A+Master+Hubbard%26%2339%3Bs+Special+Reserve%22&num=50#q=%22Mind+Polish:+Master+Hubbard%27s+Special+Reserve%22++review&hl=en&prmd=imvns&ei=4wcgUOHfC6fSigK-34BQ&start=30&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=e7f24798c128fce0&biw=1024&bih=616] and nothing in any rs.[http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Mind+Polish%3A+Master+Hubbard%26%2339%3Bs+Special+Reserve%22&num=50#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Mind+Polish:+Master+Hubbard%27s+Special+Reserve%22+-Wikipedia&oq=%22Mind+Polish:+Master+Hubbard%27s+Special+Reserve%22+-Wikipedia&gs_l=serp.3...10313.13485.3.13844.11.11.0.0.0.0.313.2328.0j3j7j1.11.0...0.0...1c._iSPeYsGQLU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=25c85992bed88120&biw=1024&bih=616] '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 18:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
|||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 10:13, 13 August 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
Urm. Do reviews count? If yes, then there appear to be quite a number of reviews, from pages like TV.com, which should be reliable. To win an award should ba a big deal too. Then, there is also an amazon page about it. [[User:Bonkers The Clown|Bonkers The Clown]] ([[User talk:Bonkers The Clown|talk]]) 13:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:*Having an Amazon page doesn't give automatic notability. It just means that it's available for sale, or was at some point in time. (Plus it's a merchant site, which means that anything they post on there is suspect because it's in their best interests to make it look like something you absolutely must buy.) Also, reviews by Tv.com probably wouldn't satisfy notability guidelines since anyone can sign up and review. I looked on the site, but was unable to find any reviews for this film on TV.com. As far as awards go... it depends. Not all awards hold equal weight here on Wikipedia and most awards aren't notable enough to keep an article by that merit alone. Normally the awards have to be the equivalent of an Oscar, Razzie, or place at a notable film festival to keep an article on that aspect alone. I always say that 99.9% of awards do not fit this qualification of Wikipedia. I'll see what I can find, but I just wanted to clarify on this part.[[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]] ([[User talk:Tokyogirl79|talk]]) 15:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. I'd say to redirect it to the [[Santino Ramos|director's page]] but he seems to be suffering from some serious notability issues himself. A search brought up zero coverage in reliable sources. There are reviews, but all by non-notable John and Jane Average-People, which cannot count towards notability. The awards don't seem to be notable enough for Wikipedia's standards, as there were no sources actually reporting on the awards other than this Wikipedia page and various merchant or primary sources.[[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]] ([[User talk:Tokyogirl79|talk]]) 15:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||