Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel W. Gonzales: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by EZW identified as vandalism to last revision by Favonian. (TW)
EZW (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:


The result was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 04:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
The result was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 04:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
===[[Joel W. Gonzales]]===
====[[:]]====
:{{DRV links||xfd_page=|article=}}


[[User:EZW|EZW]] ([[User talk:EZW|talk]]) 20:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
:{{la|Joel W. Gonzales}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel W. Gonzales|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 November 30#{{anchorencode:Joel W. Gonzales}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:({{findsources|Joel W. Gonzales}})
I think we have a vampire article here...

A very similar title [[Joel W Gonzales]] has been deleted multiple times and Salted. Another similar title [[Joel William Gonzales]] has also been deleted multiple times- and salted, though it doesn't show in the delete history.

I can't tell what was on those articles before they were deleted, and, quite frankly, it doesn't likely matter. (Though if an Admin looks, and I'm off-base here, please let me know.) If I'm wrong about the recreation, I'm still thinking this is a violation of [[WP:ENT]] as this person has not "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." [[User:Bradjamesbrown|Bradjamesbrown]] ([[User talk:Bradjamesbrown|talk]]) 07:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I forgot to make it clear in the opening comment that William is this subject's middle name. [[User:Bradjamesbrown|Bradjamesbrown]] ([[User talk:Bradjamesbrown|talk]]) 07:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. Was it speedy deleted or deleted via a discussion before? It it was I would have to say '''Delete''' per G4, however the article seems to assert notability except for the one bad reference, so then again I would '''keep''' it if it was speedy deleted before. <span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:black">[[User:IShadowed|'''<font color=#87F717> &nbsp;IShadowed&nbsp;</font>''']][[User talk:IShadowed|<span style="color:#800000; background-color:black">&nbsp;✰&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 19:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 19:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''Comment''' It appears that the article was written for Joel W. Gonzales, as evidenced by [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IShadowed&diff=next&oldid=328766285 this] edit. <span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 19:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' yes, fetchomms. This user came into the IRC #wikipedia-en-afc asking for help creating his article about a client. We then explained a possible conflict of interest to him, but he proceeded to create the article in one of my sandboxes. Once it was at a neutral point of view and what seemed notable enough I moved it into mainspace. But,
: '''1.''' If this was deleted before via deletion discussion I vote it should be deleted via G4
: '''2.''' If this was deleted before via CSD I vote it shoud be kept because it seems to count as notable. <span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:black">[[User:IShadowed|'''<font color=#87F717> &nbsp;IShadowed&nbsp;</font>''']][[User talk:IShadowed|<span style="color:#800000; background-color:black">&nbsp;✰&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 20:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' and allow back if notability can ever be properly sourced. I prettied the article up a bit before coming here to comment. His background fails [[WP:ENT]] and there is nothing to be found about hin in reliable sources. Twitter, Myspace, and IMDB just don't do it. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 21:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak delete''' per above, though it appears to have been CSD'd every time, so can't use G4. <span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 22:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' without prejudice against future recreation, if notability standards are met. However, the subject does not seem to meet inclusion requirements at this time; relevant G-hits were minimal and as Schmidt points out, reliable sources were almost nonexistent. Finally, although not directly related to AfD guidelines, the strong appearance that this is an article-for-pay is disturbing and might reasonably be taken into account when closing. [[User:Doc Tropics|Doc ]] <font color ="green">[[User talk:Doc Tropics|Tropics]]</font > 21:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 20:31, 21 February 2010