Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blanked the page
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Header}} __NEWSECTIONLINK__
{{Template:Active editnotice}}<!--
-->{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 600K
|counter = 220
|minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(2d)
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive%(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive index|mask=Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive<#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=no}}<!--
----------------------------------------------------------
New entries go down at the *BOTTOM* of the page, not here.
----------------------------------------------------------

--></noinclude>

== Self-reverting and topic bans ==

It is my understanding that when a user violates 3RR or 1RR, and self-reverts immediately, it is treated as a good-faithed mistake and gives no reason to block (or report). What about a situation where a user under a topic ban violates it, then immediately self-reverts? Could and should we treat it is a topic ban violation (punishd by a block), or is the self-revert enough to treat it as a good-faithed mistake with no action required? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
:I consider self reverts which are timely and unilateral to be not normally counted toward 3RR (or less where agreed) or topic bans <u>unless</u> they are obviously part of a disruptive pattern. If an editor is topic banned I may also consider a self reverted edit to the main article to be disruptive, unlike to an article which may be considered peripheral to the ban - the topic banned editor should know that they cannot edit one of the main pages. Except for fairly obvious gaming of restrictions it is likely less disruptive not to enforce any self reverted violation. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 21:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
::An occasional slip-up followed by an immediate self-revert is likely OK. If, however, a user is doing this dozens or hundreds of times, something is up... --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 22:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
:::Agree with both of the above. [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive75#Nableezy This (last thread on the page)] is a recent case of an editor self-reverting to game the system and copping a firm sanction. It all depends on the circumstances.--[[User:Mkativerata|Mkativerata]] ([[User talk:Mkativerata|talk]]) 22:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
::::"Use common sense" is the essence of IAR, is it not? [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 23:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
:::Agree with everyone above. Self-reverts can be used to cure unintentional xRR or topic ban violations; knowingly violating a xRR rule or a topic ban is always blockable. One particularly clear example of the latter is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive64#Abd|this case]]. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 03:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
::::I agree. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 20:38, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
How does one "Accidentally" violate a topic ban? I was just reading that page and my mouse slipped and hit the edit button. Then I tripped and as I was falling I hit the keyboard and typed all that content. As I struggled to my feet I was pawing at the desk and the mouse came down and hit save.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 23:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:If one is topic banned from the area of edit conflict '''A/B''' because of partisan editing to the '''B''' aspect, it might be possible to edit article '''Z''' in good faith without initially realising its connection to '''A'''? [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 20:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC) ps. I would thank you not to advertise my content editing method, either.
:How about accidentally hitting a rollback button instead of a diff on a watchlist? I know I do it every few months, at the very least :) Or how about when you are doing some wikignoming, like AutoEd or article quality assessment on a new article feed or a category, and around article 250 you realize that one of those you just did might have intersected with the blurry boundary of a poorly-defined topic ban? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 13:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

== Unprotected image on the Main Page Part XI and Part XII ==

{{collapse top|This is not a beat Delta / Betacommand thread.}}
{{Wikipedia:Whacking with a Wet Trout}}{{-}}

:for letting [[:File:Jane Austen, from A Memoir of Jane Austen (1870).jpg]] and [[:File:Vasco-da-gama-2.jpg]] reach the main page unprotected. [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><font color="darkred">The only constant</font></sup></sub>]] 00:32, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::The first one says it is protected, so no trout needed for that one as far as I can see. But yes, a trout is needed for the second one as far as I can see, however (as there is no protection box or "view source" (instead of "create this page") button anywhere that I can see). [&#124;[[User:Retro00064|Retro00064]]&#124;[[User talk:Retro00064|&#9742;talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Retro00064|&#x270D;contribs]]&#124;] 00:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::Both of them where unprotected until I had an admin at commons protect them ~26 minutes after they reached the main page. [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><font color="darkred">The only constant</font></sup></sub>]] 00:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::::Oh, yeah, now I see...the second one is protected at ''Commons'' (but not here at Wikipedia). :-) [&#124;[[User:Retro00064|Retro00064]]&#124;[[User talk:Retro00064|&#9742;talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Retro00064|&#x270D;contribs]]&#124;] 00:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::Its taken care of here via cascade protection. [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><font color="darkred">The only constant</font></sup></sub>]] 00:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::::::You are right. Now I get it. :-) [&#124;[[User:Retro00064|Retro00064]]&#124;[[User talk:Retro00064|&#9742;talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Retro00064|&#x270D;contribs]]&#124;] 00:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:Per [[WP:BEANS]] and the [[Streisand effect]], wouldn't it be better to just, you know, find an admin that does this sort of thing a lot and quietly ask him to fix the problem. The louder on this page we annoucne that its a problem, the more attention we draw to the fact that this happens quite frequently. It's like a giant banner saying "HEY TROLLS! WANNA FUCK UP WIKIPEDIA FOR A FEW MINUTES, HERE'S HOW!". Instead, wouldn't it be better to just, you know, work quietly to get it fixed? --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 00:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:Before I ever post I make sure that the images are protected, thus no [[WP:BEANS]]. Ive been very tempted to do just that and re-upload a wrong image, just to prove my point and try to get more admins involved. Im not always around to get this fixed. [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><font color="darkred">The only constant</font></sup></sub>]] 00:53, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, I already know that. The fact that, after the protections are done, you come here to announce "Yet again, this is a problem" alerts the trolls to a weakness in our armor. Its a dumb idea to repeatedly (now what, 12 times?) anounce "HEY TROLLS, HERE'S A CONSTANT PROBLEM THAT NO ONE FIXES ON TIME. KEEP YOUR EYES OPEN FOR THE NEXT TIME IT HAPPENS". Once it is fixed, '''there is no impending need to announce that it was a problem''', except to a) let the trolls know it is a constant problem, and thus a way to fuck up Wikipedia or b) to embarass the admins as a whole to no purposeful end. Fix the problem, then let it go. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 01:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::I am in agreement with Jayron32 here. If a vandal does get around to doing some main page image vandalism, it will be largely {{BCD}}'s fault for raising the visibility of this issue. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 13:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::::1)It's already happened. 2)we tried security through obscurity on the main page and it didn't work.©[[User:Geni|Geni]] 20:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::1) When? 2) The trouts don't seem to be doing any better. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::::::Well the highest profile event would probably be when someone repaced the globe at wikipedia.org. But there were other cases back when we didn't routinely protect such stuff. As for the trouts at least we haven't had the goatse on the main page as a result of them.©[[User:Geni|Geni]] 22:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::::I was more talking about future occurrences, i.e. subsequent to the advent of the UIOTMP series. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
*@Δ, Wasn't [[:File:Jane Austen, from A Memoir of Jane Austen (1870).jpg]] protected by MPUploadbot 8 hours before it showed up on the main page: [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&type=protect&page=File%3AJane_Austen%2C_from_A_Memoir_of_Jane_Austen_%281870%29.jpg]? --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 01:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:Yes and No. It protected the image description page (which is located here on en.wp) but never actually uploaded it locally, thus any autoconfirmed user on commons could bypass said protection. [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><font color="darkred">The only constant</font></sup></sub>]] 01:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::Ah, of course. (self-administered mini-trout for being dense). --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 01:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::::Better use [[minnow]] or [[user:Darwinfish]] for such incidents. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 21:12, 18 December 2010 (UTC).
::Great, just take the fine out of our salaries as admins. After all, as we are paid, you have a right to complain about us.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::Being volunteers doesn't make us immune to complaints. We should figure out a way to prevent this from happening all the time (and by "we", I mean people who are more comfortable than I with images). If the worst that happens is a big collective trout every so often, small price to pay for the reminder. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 01:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::::Is there a way of stopping images reaching the main page if they are unprotected? A bot takes them out of the queue or something? [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 02:00, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::@Floquenbeam, of course as an admin I get complaints, and I try to be extremely cordial in my responses. However, the tone of that, and the application to all admins, called for a reminder in my mind that we're all just doing the best we can here.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
*Why not just have whoever sets the POTD/OTD/DYK/ITN/TFA/etc. protect the image(s) used ''when the day is prepared''? AFAIK, only OTD is already 95% ready for the whole year; I doubt it's an issue if whoever prepares TFA (Raul654), POTD (Howcheng), and DYK (various) locally uploads the images they need ''at the time of preparing the blurbs/queues/etc.'' and protects them then. For ITN, I don't think any of the regulars there forget to locally upload and protect MP pics, and this just leaves OTD kind of susceptible, and we can have some bot do it ''the day before'' or something. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 03:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

<small>'''Please stop with the fucking fish who ate Cincinatti. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 03:53, 16 December 2010 (UTC)'''</small>
*Yeah, no kidding. What, is Delta/Betacommand hoping we'll just give him the right to run roughshod over Wikipedia with bots just because he points out problems and is generally unpleasantly in-our-face about them? It's already old, and every time I see it, it just reinforces my poor opinion of Betacommand's collegiality. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 20:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
::Im not asking for anything myself, but rather that ''someone'' fix the major problem. I guess I'm one of the few people who remember the days before cascade protection, when it took 20 minutes to track down how on earth a penis or goatse image was placed on the main page. I would really rather not have a repeat of that. Yes I could whip up a bot that fixes it, but the community has stated they dont want that, and because I am not an administrator here on en.wp the odds of me getting access to an admin bot is below zero so Im not going to waste my time and even propose that. However if this is not fixed exactly what I fear '''''will''''' happen, its just a matter of time. Its just so frustrating because I have seen this happen multiple times, Ive tried trouting, lol cats, and saying nothing yet nothing changes and we continue to see the problem. [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><font color="darkred">The only constant</font></sup></sub>]] 00:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
::: Security through obscurity is never a good policy, so those people getting their knickers in a knot because someone raised a prevalent issue here need to focus on the issue and not who raised it and how. As for a bot that did this kind of thing, I'm all for bots doing admin tasks where it is demonstrated that admins are consistently incompetent at doing them, this is one such case. [[User:Promethean|<b><span style="color:#FF0000;background:transparent">&nbsp; «<span style="color:#736F6E">l<span style="color:#736F6E">|<span style="color:#151B54"> Promethean ™</span>|</span>l</span>»&nbsp;</span></b>]] [[User_talk:Promethean| (talk)]] 01:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
:::: I'm not advocating for security through obscurity. I'm advocating for fixing the problem. And then letting the problem be fixed. Ex-post-facto bitching about the fact that this had not been done isn't doing much to get it fixed, now is it? So perhaps someone needs to get creative in coming up with an alternate means of reducing this problem, because showing up and leaving a giant obnoxious fish picture doesn't seem to be working... --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 13:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

=== Proposal ===
I propose to let Betacommand write his bot in conjunction with another knowledgeable bot-op who will be given either administrative rights over the bot, or be responsible for overseeing and approving Beta's administration of the bot. This needs to be dealt with and people shooting the messenger is no closer to the solution than the giant fish. - [[User:Burpelson AFB|Burpelson AFB]] [[User talk:Burpelson AFB|✈]] 14:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

{{collapse bottom}}

== Please redirect "I_Agapi_Akoma_Zi" to "I_agapi_akoma_zei" ==

Hello.

I've re-created the article "I Agapi Akoma Zi" to "I agapi akoma zei" due to bad transliteration of the Greek song name title, and thus the article's title. When I tried to redirect the former to the newer, a warning message told me that the page cannot be changed due to be blacklisted.

Please, redirect to the new, corrected article to avoid near duplication.

Thanks in advance --[[User:Ricardo Cancho Niemietz|Ricardo Cancho Niemietz]] ([[User talk:Ricardo Cancho Niemietz|talk]]) 16:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
:Done. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 01:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

== Auto-blocking by default? ==

Currently, the default block settings will block IP addresses recently used by a blocked user (per the "Auto-block any IP addresses used" check box). I've recently encountered a number of cases where this lead to problems. As a result, I think we should discuss if we want to enable auto-blocking by default, and if we should give clearer guidelines on when and when not to use auto-blocking. On the one hand, auto-blocks can be very useful for dealing with generally disruptive users who are willing to sock to evade a block. But on the other hand, we have many users who get temporarily blocked due to minor infractions, and who accept the block, probably not happily, but with a reasonable degree of contentedness. Since more and more organizations use [[Firewall (computing)|Firewall]]s and [[Network Address Translation]], very often many legitimate users are behind an institutional IP used by a blocked user (think university, company, library). On the other hand, many residential users can get a brand-new IP-address via a reset of their DSL modem, so auto-blocks are not a sure-fire thing. I personally would suggest to avoid auto-blocking for established users who have no history of socking or block evasion. This may be achieved by changing the default on the block page, and/or by adding an appropriate explanation on that page. I'm happy to hear pros and cons. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 19:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
:As I myself have probably caused innocent bystanders to be autoblocked due to recent fair blocks on my account and my dynamic IP address (I can "get a brand-new IP-address via a reset of their DSL modem"); I '''support''' this suggestion. [[User:Barts1a|Barts1a]] | [[User_Talk:Barts1a|Talk to me]] | [[User:Barts1a/complaints and constructive criticism|Yell at me]] | Merry Christmas to all! 22:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
::I think a simple clarification of policy that tells admins when and when not to enable autoblock would be fine. It doesn't matter if it's default as one can uncheck the box. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 01:20, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
:::"It doesn't matter if the blinker is on by default, because the driver can always turn it off" ;-). Sorry, but this would make a large difference in practice. If there is a consensus that auto-blocking is the rare case, we should support this by this simple technical means. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 08:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
::::I know, but I don't think it should be the rare case—we can always turn it off later if clicked by accident, but if we leave it off by accident, then we can't prevent the same person from continuing to vandalize. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 16:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
:Dedicated vandals and trolls will get around it either way, so I don't think that should enter into our thinking. What it will stop is the casual vandal who is willing to log out to continue vandalizing, which probably describes most of the vandals at Wikipedia. I agree that it should be left "on" by default, its likely to cause more problems by being left off than on. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 16:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
:Per Jayron32. I presume that when the use of the block button was devolved to admins it had already been found that a blocked vandal account was likely to immediately "exact revenge" through disruptive editing via the ip, and thus it was decided to default to autoblock. A decent block notice on the user talkpage, which the auto block refers to, will advise the non disruptive ip editor what the situation is. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 20:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

::I agree. At one point, I experimented with unchecking the autoblock button when blocking vandals. It became quickly apparent that the common response was just continuation of the same vandalism from an IP address. So I think the autoblock button should be on by default. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 13:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

:::I think that we should have a CheckUser bot keep track of which IP ranges have this problem (I don't think that giving the community a general picture of "127.0.0.0/16 has 2000 IPs autoblocked" would be a violation of anyone's privacy), and add them to [[MediaWiki:Autoblock whitelist]]. Beyond that, I think that all blocks except for AGF usernames, role accounts and malfunctioning approved bots should be autoblocked.
:I don't think a CU bot would ever be approved. Too risky, marginal benefits. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 23:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies]] is backlogged ==

There are open requests at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies]] dating to November. Could an admin with experience in answering requests there please respond? Thanks! --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 00:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

== Stop the bot ==

Hope I'm in the right place, this is the first time I've used this board... apparently [[user:MPUploadBot|MPUploadBot]] is caught in an infinite loop (see the page at the upcoming POTD [[:File:Oil platform P-51 (Brazil).jpg]]) and needs to be kicked or something. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 03:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
:{{done}}. [[User:Nakon|<font color="#C50">'''Nakon'''</font>]] 03:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
::I do believe I have fixed this. My TS account ran out of disk quota, so it couldn't save any more images, resulting in a failed upload, resulting in a constant loop of "the page doesn't exist!". I have cleared out disk space, so it should work again. The important thing... '''When you block a bot, notify the owner!'''. Had I not been checking this (which many admins do not), I would not have seen this. <small>([[User:X!|<span style="color:gray">X!</span>]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:X!|<span style="color:gray">talk</span>]]) &nbsp;·&nbsp;[[.beat|@258]] &nbsp;·&nbsp;</small> 05:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
:::Unblocked. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WikiProject Japan</font>]]!</small> 06:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

== UAA ==

There's a bit of a backlog at [[WP:UAA]], if an admin familiar with the intricacies of the username policy would like to get block some of the vios. Thanks. <span id="sig" style="background:#FFFFC0">'''[[User:Giftiger wunsch|<font face="Verdana" color="#900000">Giftiger<font color="#FF0000">Wunsch</font></font>]]''' [[User talk:Giftiger wunsch|<font face="Tahoma" color="#0060A0">[TALK]</font>]]</span> 22:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
:Cleared (mostly). ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WikiProject Japan</font>]]!</small> 23:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

== [[User: 109.78.198.253]] ==

{{resolved|1=Blocked. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 00:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)}}
Not really a big deal, but this IP appeared recently at 2 User talkpages to say hello. The IP has indentified itself as the banned user [[User:Redking7|Redking7]]. -- [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 23:00, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Previously, the same banned editor used [[User:84.203.65.99|84.203.65.99]], on articles & article talkpages, aswell. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 02:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

== New account making null edits? ==

{{user|Boi O Death}} just popped up on my watchlist; seems to be making null edits. Could be a vandal account trying to get past some tresholds...? Or could be something innocent... I haven't seen anything similar. Thoughts? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 12:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
:This looks like it may possibly be a user who thinks that one becomes "Autoconfirmed" by doing enough edits, and not knowing that he would also need to have 4 days. Note that his may not be only som,ething a vandal would do - some of the reasons for creating an account listed at [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]] require a user to be autoconfirmed. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד&nbsp;מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od&nbsp;Mishehu]] 13:30, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

*Notify the discussed user anyone? [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 13:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
User has been notified [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boi_O_Death&oldid=403174380 here]. [[User:Jarkeld|Jarkeld]] ([[User talk:Jarkeld|talk]]) 13:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

:Firstly, Making null edits is not a violation of policy, there are several reasons for doing that, so AGF, even if the user is just doing it to get autoconfirmed there are reasons for wanting that other than to vandalise or similar. Secondly, it's not exactly nice to tell a new user that they're already being discussed on the admins board, it slaps of WP:BITE in that it's not exactly welcoming and may deter the user. In this instance the proper course of action would have been to sit back and keep an eye on the user yourself, I hope you are capable of that, and then report to ANI/AIV if and when the user does become an issue. Until such a time there is nothing no one can do here. Case closed. [[User:Promethean|<b><span style="color:#FF0000;background:transparent">&nbsp; «<span style="color:#736F6E">l<span style="color:#736F6E">|<span style="color:#151B54"> Promethean ™</span>|</span>l</span>»&nbsp;</span></b>]] [[User_talk:Promethean| (talk)]] 14:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

::Since I was not familiar with a case like this, I wanted to bring it here and ask for advice from active admins who I assumed may be more familiar with such cases. I don't see myself suggesting a block or anything like that, so BITE hardly applies - other then, apparently, in being bitten for daring to ask a question here. Next time I'll consider the benefits of stumbling in the dark or doing nothing instead of seeking advice. PS. Thanks to Od Mishehu in particular for giving useful advice. As far as I am concerned, that should've been the end of this matter. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 16:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
:::First of all, I believe they're not null edits (which would not be recorded in the articles' histories or in the account's contributions) but [[WP:DUMMY|dummy edits]]. The last two of his edits at the time of my writing this—and presumably all the other edits as well—involved adding unnecessary additional word spaces, between the first two sentences of the section [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Coat_of_arms_of_Prijepolje&diff=prev&oldid=403192513 here] and between "c." and "1915" [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Quincy_Dredge_Number_Two&diff=prev&oldid=403192261 here] (the changes don't show up in the diffs; one has to look at the edit windows for the versions before and after the edits). Although the changes may be minimal, it would be interesting to know what the person thinks he's doing. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 16:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

:Although I see this was somewhat settled by Promethean a couple posts ago, I felt that I should at least acknowledge and respond to the charges by which Piotrus is persecuting me. I just want to know if what I was doing is a crime, and if so, I will halt my actions immediately. And if not (and even if so), I would like that you please contact me of my actions or any other grievances you have toward me privately before you attempt to grab a pitchfork-wielding mob to crucify me. Thanks in advance! [[User:Boi O Death|Boi O Death]] ([[User talk:Boi O Death|talk]]) 16:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
::For starters you're screwing peoples watchlists up. Real edits are being hidden from your null edits. I think it'd be a good idea to stop...[[User:RxS|RxS]] ([[User talk:RxS|talk]]) 17:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
::"persecuting", "crime", "pitchfork-wielding mob", "crucify"? Sounds like somebody is overreacting. Do I hear ''quacking''? [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 17:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
:::Can I ask if that was a necessary post that contributed at all to this discussion, Yworo? It just so happens that that is the way I talk. And excuse me if I may seem a tad paranoid, but I have already been attacked by multiple people, as it seems (which includes you). [[User:Boi O Death|Boi O Death]] ([[User talk:Boi O Death|talk]]) 17:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
::::So are you going to tell us why you're scattering isolated spaces about in an indiscriminate manner? [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 17:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::I don't see any reason to keep this discussion going, so unless there is something substantive on which I can comment, I am going to ignore this - and I suggest you all do the same. [[User:Boi O Death|Boi O Death]] ([[User talk:Boi O Death|talk]]) 17:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
::::::Substantive... how about answering Deor's question above? @Yworo: I think I am hearing it, too... --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
As far as I know, according to what I have always been taught, it is right and proper to add two spaces when following periods. Nothing more, nothing less. So please, just let me be on my way to editing more grammar and spelling mistakes, and I will stop my space-adding. [[User:Boi O Death|Boi O Death]] ([[User talk:Boi O Death|talk]]) 17:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
:If you put a double space, the MediaWiki software will trim it back to one space. See [[:MOS#Spaces following terminal punctuation]]. - [[User:David Biddulph|David Biddulph]] ([[User talk:David Biddulph|talk]]) 18:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

:See [[Wikipedia:MOS#Spaces_following_terminal_punctuation]]. Although in proportional typesetting, for decades, only one space has been used (not two spaces), the wiki software treats two or one spaces as only one space when rendering a page. There is no reason at all for adding two spaces to terminal punctuation on Wikipedia. Two spaces is mostly a leftover from the days of [[typewriter]]s, most of which used non-proportional characters. [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 18:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
:Dear Boi, you are more than welcome to help with copyediting the Wikipedia, but as Gwen mentions above, familiarizing yourself with [[Wikipeda:Manual of style]] would be helpful. I'd also suggest you check the guides and activities of projects such as [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors]]. Well-meaning but misguided actions can lead to discussions such as the ones here. Lastly, please avoid [[WP:PA|personal attacks]] - check out policies such as [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIV]]. And good luck with your future copyedits, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 18:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

== MfD backlog ==

There is a growing backlog at MfD going all the way back into November 26 that need to be closed. —'''[[User:TheFarix|Farix]]'''&nbsp;([[User talk:TheFarix|t]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/TheFarix|c]]) 14:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
:And SFD has a major backlog, including one discussion from October. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד&nbsp;מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od&nbsp;Mishehu]] 14:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

== User:HelloAnnyong ==

{{Moved to|WP:ANI#User:HelloAnnyong|2=<span id="sig" style="background:#FFFFC0">'''[[User:Giftiger wunsch|<font face="Verdana" color="#900000">Giftiger<font color="#FF0000">Wunsch</font></font>]]''' [[User talk:Giftiger wunsch|<font face="Tahoma" color="#0060A0">[TALK]</font>]]</span> 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 23:19, 19 December 2010