Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Cubs Opening Day starting pitchers/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 17:30, 22 December 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Rlendog (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the criteria. This list is more similar to List of Philadelphia Phillies Opening Day starting pitchers than the other Opening Day starting pitcher FLs because, like the Phillies list, this list goes back to the 19th century, and less information is available for the 19th century and early 20th century (and the sources do not summarize the data as usefully) than more recent data. Rlendog (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Hope these comments help. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Looks good to me. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 00:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NMajdan |
---|
—NMajdan•talk 15:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support, pending the resolution of the image issue mentioned by Giants2008.—NMajdan•talk 20:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 17:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
To add one note on the new Fred Goldsmith photo, the licensing is incorrect. The uploader couldn't have placed this into the public domain, unless she was around in the late 1880s and took the photo (unlikely). This image was published before 1923, so it should have that template instead, and the source should mention the newspaper. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 17:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support, though with areservation on the image. I'd at least like to know where the image really was from (clearly from a newspaper; I think it's from The Sporting News but that's not verifiable unless someone has archive access). Wizardman 18:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Commons link states the sketch is from "The Official Baseball Record". As per my reply to Giants2008, I don't have a problem removing the image if it is problematic, but I don't think it is and it is always nice to see what some of these old-time, mostly forgotten players looked like. Rlendog (talk) 02:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- My suggestion would be to add the publication name and date (visible in the photo) to the image description on Commons. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Rlendog (talk) 20:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- My suggestion would be to add the publication name and date (visible in the photo) to the image description on Commons. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Commons link states the sketch is from "The Official Baseball Record". As per my reply to Giants2008, I don't have a problem removing the image if it is problematic, but I don't think it is and it is always nice to see what some of these old-time, mostly forgotten players looked like. Rlendog (talk) 02:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.