User talk:You've gone incognito/2017/January

Your sig

It needs another </font> at the end. Check out the bottom: [1] – Muboshgu (talk) 21:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@Muboshgu: But it has, ever since I've changed my signature. Ah, now I see the problem: there's a </font> beside the date that goes by the signature on the Joe Biden talk. Gee, I wonder how did that end up there... Bluesphere 04:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't sure how it was happening either, but I figured you could find the culprit if you looked. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

"Paul Nuttall"

Thanks for your vigilance on this article but it is unnecessary. Please revert the image file back to the black and white image. The image is from a verified, official source https://twitter.com/paulnuttallukip the image was taken by Gawain Towler, a UKIP press officer who has permitted it to be used in any official context.

Thank you Wordforge (talk) 11:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

@Wordforge: The problem with the photo is that its license has not been attributed properly and there's no guarantee of copyright from the author. Also, the photo was not uploaded in Wikipedia Commons, Wikipedia;s photo repository. Sorry, but I can't revert that image back in Wikipedia. Please make sure that it has a licensing tag placed there. Please ask any editor in Wikipedia Commons to help you out on that. Bluesphere 12:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Sandra Fluke info box photo

Hey Bluesphere, Could you explain why you changed the photo of Sandra Fluke? I was fond of the previous one and don't understand your reason for changing it. Shameran81 (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

@Shameran81: No reason, except simply because it is a photo of Fluke. That Ms. magazine cover photo of hers is best placed inside the article since it's scope of the controversy she's had with Rush Limbaugh back in 2012. Bluesphere 04:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)