Jump to content

User talk:Yashweb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yashweb. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yashweb (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet and I don't have any connection with any other account.I have only this account which is Yashweb.So Please Unblock me I have not even done any kind editing from when I got unblock. I do use this id for reading Wikipedia information and I want to edit only grammatical mistakes or any of wrong information but I didn't got yet so I didn't do yet. Yashweb (talk) 08:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple denial is insufficient, as every sock puppet denies being one. This could be meat puppetry instead, but either way, you'll need to explain the similarities that led to the block. 331dot (talk) 10:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yashweb (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

@331dot yes your denial is insufficient, as every sock puppet denies being one but I am not one of those and about investigation I don't know the process and things but Cleary I don't have any connection with @NITINDUBEY03 and @RWR765 and about @HMGY I know him we are from same area and we use most of the time same internet connection and if I am not wrong so IP depends on area Internet connection so it could be the reason of our connection but we are different people and who has just similar passion nothing else we are here just for contributing our knowledges. Now If this was the reason so please unblock me @331dot. Yashweb (talk) 12:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"we are from same area and we use most of the time same internet connection". Um, no. This doesn't make sense to be at all. I can be from the same area as someone, and have the same ISP, but my IP will be different than them. This, to me, is clear sockpuppetry going on. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review your request, but you say you have no connection with the other users and then go on to say that you know him- that is a connection. 331dot (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]