Talk:Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

A fact from Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. dealt with the confusion of an unwary Internet user of "average intelligence and imperfect recollection"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd..

Wikipedia

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DYK nomination of Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Hello! Your submission of Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vocabulary

I presume words such as lacuna and expatiated are legal terms. However they are not in general usage. Should they be used here, or should they be rephrased in more common English gap and made a lengthy exposition. Even opined and facet here are pushing the boundaries slightly. Does this article need translating into English? -- SGBailey (talk) 15:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. They are not technically legal words, and are used commonly in legal and non-legal articles. Maybe, 'opined' could be categorized as a legal term, but then it is easily understandable.- Yaj57

Lacuna, expatiated and opined are not common words. I'll think up some synonyms and change them. -- SGBailey (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey

Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 18:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]