User talk:Seventh Ward Dragon

Welcome to Seventh Ward Dragon's talk page. Because I am semi-retired, I am no longer very active on the English Wikipedia, however I do still check up every now and then. Please do not expect an immediate response by leaving a message here, I will get back to you as soon as I am able. Thank you. -- SWDG

Archives
1	2	3

1-3 months old	3-12 months old	>12 months old

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.217.198 (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Fleming Wikipedia page

The statement surrounding him 'Comparing civil unions to incest' is both incorrectly interpreted and insufficiently substantiated with proper referencing or quotes. Thus, it should be removed on the grounds of potential misinformation. 101.98.138.184 (talk) 02:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The statement is substantiated by two local news outlets. How is it incorrectly interpreted exactly? I have already explained how it isn't. The material is properly cited and should not be removed without proper explanation, which you have yet to provide. SW DG 02:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Your edit to Rick and Morty – Corporate Assets has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Staraction (talk | contribs) 05:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the offending content, and the offensive content has been REVDEL'd. SW DG 19:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So are you making Wikipedia pages for all the Rick and Morty comic book series, or what? 38.95.10.252 (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Seventh Ward Dragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a ridiculous edit but immediately reverted it. Should not have happened in the first place, I apologize for the activity. I took it a step too far by creating the article, but I took steps to remove that too by moving it to draft space and CSD the remnants. I understand that was not cool, but you probably could have just WP:revdel it and move on. I will not do that again.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I made a ridiculous edit but immediately reverted it. Should not have happened in the first place, I apologize for the activity. I took it a step too far by creating the article, but I took steps to remove that too by moving it to draft space and CSD the remnants. I understand that was not cool, but you probably could have just [[WP:revdel]] it and move on. I will not do that again. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I made a ridiculous edit but immediately reverted it. Should not have happened in the first place, I apologize for the activity. I took it a step too far by creating the article, but I took steps to remove that too by moving it to draft space and CSD the remnants. I understand that was not cool, but you probably could have just [[WP:revdel]] it and move on. I will not do that again. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I made a ridiculous edit but immediately reverted it. Should not have happened in the first place, I apologize for the activity. I took it a step too far by creating the article, but I took steps to remove that too by moving it to draft space and CSD the remnants. I understand that was not cool, but you probably could have just [[WP:revdel]] it and move on. I will not do that again. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

SW DG 10:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a checkuser block and your unblock request does not address the actual reason for the block. Cullen328 (talk) 10:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to further explain the reason for the block? SW DG 10:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]