User talk:Waiting for ARBCOM

Questions

I'm curious: If you're brave enough to create a throw-away account to post to NYB's talk page, why not just log in and post as yourself? Your question isn't really out of line, so I'm not blocking or anything - but when you talk about "credibility"??? .. Well let's just say that you're certainly not building any of it by posting this way. IDK .. Perhaps I'm guilty of feeding things I shouldn't; heaven knows I been hit with the YHBT stuff many times over the years. Personally I'd like to see Cla68 back ASAP as well - but I doubt this approach is going to speed things up either. Oh well, your choice I suppose. I'll just leave you with some TJW music for your listening pleasure. Cheers. — Ched : ? 07:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because everything else has worked so well to accelerate this situation?

Perhaps you could suggest a course of action that would have better outcomes?

My credibility is not at stake. I'm not on the wikiSCOTUS. Waiting for ARBCOM (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you talked to Cla68 via email or at WO? I admit that it's been a few weeks since I touched base with him, but AFAIK his email link still works. — Ched : ? 08:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And if the wrong person gets a bug up their keister, and a CU is run, then yes - your cred. will be at stake. — Ched : ? 09:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The ball is not in Cla68's court. ARBCOM has been saying for weeks that things are close. They aren't. I couldn't care less is someone runs a checkuser.Waiting for ARBCOM (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]