User talk:Vedant Katyayan

Need help

I need urgent help with figuring out which sources are reliable and which sources are not as per Wikipedia policy. Can any experienced editor guide me? Vedant Katyayan (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RS. If you have questions about a specific source, you can ask at WP:RSN. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Compassionate727 Thanks, Appreciated. Vedant Katyayan (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message to Vedant Katyayan

You restored what was a very reasonable removal several times—I want to point out specifically that verifiability does not guarantee inclusion—and that's assuming the passage actually accurately represented its sources and those sources were reliable. Cheers Remsense ‥ 论 15:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense I don't understand, if you are assuming that passage is based on sources cited then why that passage should be removed? Vedant Katyayan (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am still learning it all so please guide me. Vedant Katyayan (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many reasons! Never revert edits instantly based on ironclad rules, because there are none as easy as "always keep sourced content"—that would be silly. For example, a passage can be sourced but inappropriate in the context of the article, or it could be misrepresenting its source. Please read the link I've given above for more information. In this case, verifiability is a core content policy, but equally important is our core content policy about neutral point of view. Always read the reason given for edits, and please ask on the talk page or elsewhere like WP:The Teahouse if you're not sure about something before getting into an edit war. Remsense ‥ 论 15:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense Understood. Thank you. Vedant Katyayan (talk) 16:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]