User talk:Teamdopefreshnationforlife

Welcome!

Hello, Teamdopefreshnationforlife, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as America's Next New Artist (season 1), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of America's Next New Artist (season 1)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as America's Next New Artist (season 1), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

American Ninja Warrior edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Ninja Warrior. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 03:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Teamdopefreshnationforlife, Stop Changing the American Ninja Warrior Obstacles.

Please stop adding fake stuff to the American Ninja Warrior page. Now you might be thinking that I have added fake stuff to the page, but when I do add stuff I give proof when I do add obstacles to the page. But why do you keep changing the obstacles? If you are going to change them, please give proof so that I and the public know it actually exists. I'm talking to you now because I got a warning message saying that we seem to be in a edit war. I really don't wanna go through another edit war, I've already had to put up with enough of them. So please stop adding fake obstacles to the page. I'll handle everything when the proof arrives. Oh and NBC won't be taping the Season 7 finals till late June. (Proof: http://on-camera-audiences.com/shows/American_Ninja_Warrior) (See I just gave proof.) So please leave the page alone and like I said, I'll handle everything with proof. I'm sorry I had to interrupt you, But I don't wanna put up with this again.

JasonNolan64 (Talk: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:JasonNolan64)

May 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at American Ninja Warrior. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

America's Got Talent (season 10)

Hi, I notice we're in a bit of an "edit war," and i think it would be best for us to come up with a consensus.

Because we did not include extensive information about auditions in past seasons (see Season 9, or 8, or 7), there is no reason to have these audition tables. That information is better suited for a website like America's Got Talent Wiki (http://agt.wikia.com/wiki/Episode_1001). We should wait until the Semifinals, or at least Vegas at the earliest for all this information.

We should also continue talking about this on the article's talk page so we can get more opinions, but in the meantime, we should not include these tables.

206.117.40.12 (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Your recent editing history at America's Got Talent (season 10) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Teamdopefreshnationforlife reported by User:Winner 42 (Result: ). Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Acroterion (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Teamdopefreshnationforlife_reported_by_User:HillMountain_.28Result:_.29. Thank you. HillMountain (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

American Ninja Warrior

For the last time, your list of obstacles is not necessary, and not wanted for this encyclopedia article, per WP:FANCRUFT, WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTSTATS. Please refrain from adding it again. Also, this is a warning about WP:3RR- I see you've been blocked previously for edit warring, if you readd this, then it's a violation of WP:3RR and you will be reported to WP:AN3. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:56, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Teamdopefreshnationforlife reported by User:Joseph2302 (Result: ). Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at American Ninja Warrior. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Ninja Warrior. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent edit warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]