Jump to content

User talk:Tanweer Morshed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Tanweer drmc)

19:45, Saturday, November 30, 2024 (UTC)


Talk Home
Welcome to my talk page. Insults, suggestions, questions, or just talking is welcome. Just please sign your posts.
Please click here to leave me a message

DRMC

[edit]

Please first pass the Good article criteria. See the criteria at WP:GA, and then nominate at WP:GAN. After satisfying them, we can try for an FA status. I will be able to take a look at the article next week. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 22:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, I did some more disambiguating, this is a good way to find links to disambiguation pages on a particular page. I'm not too comfortable assessing Good Articles, and this page is definitely outside of my comfort zone so I will have to decline your request to assess it, sorry. I will look over it some more and see if I can make any improvements. Good luck with the assessment! J04n(talk page) 00:38, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there. Sorry to say it, but I'm afraid I'm just too busy right now to take on any more reviewing or copyediting work here. Good luck with the article, though! Scartol • Tok 12:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your help request, Dhaka school article

[edit]

I can only offer very limited assistance at the moment because of other pressures, but I will do what I can to help you improve the article. The first thing you should do, in my opinion, is to withdraw the Good Article nomination. As yet the article is nowhere near meeting the GA criteria, so don't wait for it to fail, withdraw it now, and we'll see what we can do, but it may be a lengthy process. Brianboulton (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Pahela Boishakh celebration by Chhayanat.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://banglaphoto.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/new_year.jpg on http://banglaphoto.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/pohela-boishakh-bangla-new-year/ (Copyright Geoffrey Hiller). As a copyright violation, File:Pahela Boishakh celebration by Chhayanat.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Pahela Boishakh celebration by Chhayanat.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 01:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Copy Edit

[edit]

I have noted your request to the Guild of Copy Editors for assistance, and will have a look at Dhaka Residential Model College for you over the weekend. -- S Masters (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tanweer Morshed. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Tanweer Morshed. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your GA nomination of Dhaka Residential Model College

[edit]

Hello, I will be glad to be review the article Dhaka Residential Model College you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

--Nasty Housecat (talk) 17:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

As part of the GA review, I have identified copyright issues that you will need to address immediately. I have noted them on the review page also, but will comment here to call you attention to the problems.

Man of the images used in Dhaka Residential Model College are sourced to DRMC but licensed as if you had released your own into the public domain. This is not allowed. If they are your own images, you have sourced them incorrectly. If they are school property, you may not use them unless the school formally releases them into the public domain (and documents that fact) or donates them for use here. See WP:DCM. Some of the images are clearly from the school website. You may not use them until the correct permission is obtained. You should remove the images as soon as possible.

This is a common mistake for new editors to make. I have done it myself. But you do have to fix it. The best thing would be to replace them with images that you have taken yourself, if possible.

Please let me know if you have questions. I will leave the review open and return to it once the image issues are resolved.

--Nasty Housecat (talk) 22:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the DRMC image gallery on Commons and those photos all have the same problem. The claim the school as author and then use a self-PD license. They will have to be fixed as well or they will get deleted. Are they from the website or did you take them yourself? --Nasty Housecat (talk) 02:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. They are mostly good now. Three comments:
  • For the image you claim is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 (DRMC_football_team.JPG), attribution is not enough. The school will have to confirm permission to use with an email (see donation instructions above). Once the email is sent, you can use the {{OTRS pending}} tag while permission is confirmed by OTRS volunteers. This is the required procedure for any image you take from the website (or any other copyrighted source).
  • Did you correct all the images at Commons as well? They had the same issue.
  • The logo is fine, but you need to include a Fair Use Rationale for this article. Use the {{Logo fur]}} template for best results.
I will continue the review and post more comment in the next few days. Regards.

--Nasty Housecat (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original Barnstar Award

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
I hereby award you with the Original Barnstar for your consistent hard work to help build a better Wikipedia. S Masters (talk) 07:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You're welcome. It's well deserved. I encourage you to give out Barnstars to others (where appropriate), to show appreciation for their work. You can find a list of Barnstars at WP:Barnstars. If you see any good work which you think should be rewarded, don't be shy! :) Keep up the good work! -- S Masters (talk) 07:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dhaka Residential Model College

[edit]

The article Dhaka Residential Model College you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dhaka Residential Model College for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment.

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Nasty Housecat's talk page.

Hello, Tanweer Morshed. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dhaka Residential Model College peer review

[edit]

I will be glad to take a look at it, but i have an article in FAC now, am in the middle of reviewing two others, and have agreed to review two more before this one (so it will take several days). Thanks for asking, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume I can do it in the next week, which would still be March. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Tanweer Morshed. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Tanweer Morshed. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your GA nomination of Dhaka Residential Model College

[edit]

The article Dhaka Residential Model College you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. See Talk:Article for things needing to be addressed.

I have also made some minor copyedits in the course of the review. If you feel any of them are in error, please feel free to revert them.

--Nasty Housecat (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


{{#switch:pass|passed|pass=The article Dhaka Residential Model College you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dhaka Residential Model College for eventual comments about the article. Well done! --Nasty Housecat (talk) 17:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National Debate Federation Bangladesh

[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on National Debate Federation Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Stifle (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Shaheed President Ziaur Rahman Medical College, Bogra 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Nasty Housecat's talk page.

Schools Barnstar

[edit]
The Schools Barnstar
I hereby award this Barnstar to Tanweer Morshed, for all your hard work and dedication on Dhaka Residential Model College, resulting in its listing as a Good Article. Congratulations! - S Masters (talk) 05:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of DCC.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo of DCC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kudos for your article on DRMC

[edit]

It looks great. Among the Articles on Bangladeshi educational institutions, it is one of the best if not the best. Thanks for all your hard work and best of luck. - Mahdee Jameel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahdee Jameel (talk • contribs) 01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) --Tanweer (talk) 12:28, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Bangladesh National Museum, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.banglaembassy.com.bh/Historical%20Page3.htmhttp://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/B_0223.HTM, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Bangladesh National Museum saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! MLauba (Talk) 10:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dhaka Zoo, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/Z_0020.HTM (introduced on 23 October 2009, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Dhaka Zoo saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Chittagong is also now blanked for investigation, as it seems to include substantial content from [1]. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Folk Culture of Bangladesh is copied from multiple subpages. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I have removed content you added to Narayanganj, as it was copied from [2]. Sonali Bank was also copied. As the templates above advise, Wikipedia cannot accept content copied from other sources unless we can verify that the material is ours to use. In this case, I'm afraid it clearly is not. Banglapedia plainly reserves its content: "©Copyright Banglapedia 2006. All Rights Reserved." --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by repeatedly copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You were warned that this is against policy and cautioned that persistence would lead to a block, here and [3], but did not stop. Your infringement of BanglaPedia on 2 January 2010 in Folk Culture of Bangladesh well postdates those warnings.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified or wish to offer some plausible assurances that you will comply with our copyright policy henceforth, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. I do not believe you should be unblocked without first making clear that you both understand and will follow those policies, given your apparent disregard of earlier cautions. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In reply to the note left by an IP at my talk page, by our policies all content is presumed to be copyrighted unless it can be verified otherwise. In the case of Banglapedia, there is no presumption necessary, as it says at the bottom of every page, "© Copyright Banglapedia 2006. All Rights Reserved."
If you wish to be unblocked, you need to place your unblock request on your talk page, as per the directions above. During a block, you should not edit any page other than your talk page, as doing otherwise is block evasion. While your note at my talk page is not a particularly big problem, I am concerned that you may have used the same IP to edit Special:Contributions/180.200.239.60 on August 27th, as you had previously been one of its primary editors. Was this you? If so, you must promise not to continue if you are hoping to be unblocked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I posted in your page talk page from that IP address as I had no other way to contact with you. I promise not to do so anymore. I've put the {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Please consider my request. However I've never edited the article Eastern Bank Ltd, though the IP which had been used to edit the article is same to my IP. This is not impossible to change one's IP. Thanks. Tanweer (talk) 13:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tanweer Morshed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've unintentionally violated Wikipedia's copyright policy. I proclaim I will not further copy from copyrighted source

Decline reason:

You have received many warnings, therefore your copyright violations were intentional. This does not convince me that you understand, let alone will abide by, our copyright policy or indeed the concept of copyright.  Sandstein  15:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for clarifying your use of the IP. Given your note at my talk page that you did not realize Banglapedia was a copyrighted source, I would request that you consider agreeing not to copy from any source unless you are able to prove that is not under copyright. We really can't risk your importing content under mistaken understanding of the copyright status again. Not only does this run the risk of legal problems from the project and our reusers, but it causes considerable damage to articles when they must be cleaned later and subsequent contributions are lost. All content you bring to Wikipedia from sources you cannot prove are without copyright should be written in your own words, except for brief clearly marked quotations. (For the amount of rewriting to constitute "in your own words", please see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. It offers some guidance on this issue.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please consider taking necessary measures to unblock me. I've several important tasks in some articles, but due to Block, i am unable to do these. I'm afraid how long it will take to get unblocked. Tanweertalk 14:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've explained beneath your unblock request that I do not feel comfortable with your proclamation. You indicated that you did not realize Banglapedia was a copyrighted source. This source bears copyright notice on every page. How can we be certain, given that, that you will not copy from other copyrighted sources without noticing that they cannot be used? I myself do not feel comfortable unblocking you until you promise not to copy from any source that you cannot prove to be without copyright restriction. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It may be noted that, when I've violated the copyright policy, I was a newcomer in Wikipedia. I realized the copyright policy afterward and haven't copied from copyrighted source till then. You may see my recent editing to understand that. I've already promised that I will not to copy from any source that I cannot prove to be without copyright restriction. Will I not be further able to edit articles in Wikipedia from my account? I've further nothing to do as I've apologized for my mistakes. Tanweertalk 16:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tanweer Morshed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In reply to Sandstein: I've received warnings before but not for copying text from Banglapedia. This was the first time Moonriddengirl warned me for this. It may be noted that I did these tasks (copying from Banglapedia) when I was a newcomer in Wikipedia, I wasn't perceived of the copyright policy as much as now. I've also never been blocked before. You may observe me after unblocking, whether I further violate copyright policy or not. You may block or even ban me forever if you find that I've violated. But I think it would be injustice to keep me blocked for an indefinite period.

Decline reason:

Moonriddengirl made very clear the terms you must agree to in order to be unblocked. Given your history of repeated copyright violations after repeated warnings, the offer is more than reasonable. If you unambiguously indicate that you agree to that offer you may be unblocked, if you do not you may not. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|In reply to Seraphimblade: Sure, why I won't agree if I've no intention to commit something that is detrimental to Wikipedia? So I am unambiguously stating that, I agree not to copy from any source unless I am able to prove that is not under copyright. Thanks for your co-operation. -- Tanweertalk 11:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

in view of your undertaking.

Request handled by: JohnCD (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Sources

[edit]

Hello Tanweer; I am currently working on the article Indians in Bangladesh. Since you are from there, I would greatly appreciate if you could come across any local Bangladeshi sources on the internet which discuss this topic as I am looking to expand the article. Any form of help will be deeply welcomed. If you are busy, then don't bother :) Cheers, Mar4d (talk) 09:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your wish for getting help from me. I've found a few websites discussing any aspects about the topic. But currently I extremely busy with my studies as I'm going to appear in a number of exams within next few weeks. So at present, I can't help you as much as I want. But I'll try to help you in this regard after my exams. However the websites are:

-- Tanweer (talk) 10:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback...will try to utlise the sources as soon as possible. Mar4d (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Dear Tanweer,

You have use my photographic work in your article without my permission, which is a serious offence and I am able to proceed with legal steps against this mischievous act. Not only you copied my photographic work from my Flickr page but also removed my copyright signature using image editing software which is more serious offence.

I would be happy to let you using my photographic work if you would ask permission for that, but without asking any permission, you removed my copyright information from my photo and used it as if this work was copyrighted by you!! I demand good reason from you why you did this and request to remove this image immediately OR replace the image with my original copyright information (and me as the copyright owner of this image).

I am complaining about this image you have uploaded after altering my copyright signature: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Gokul_Medh.jpg#file

Here is my original work:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelord/4080503743/in/set-72157622748255894/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pixelord (talk • contribs) 07:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just requested an administrator of Wikimedia Commons to delete the photo from Wikimedia Commons as soon as possible. Because I am not an administrator in Commons and so have not the right to delete any photo. After the deletion, I could upload it in Commons without any editing and mention you as the original author and copyright holder. Thank you. Regards Tanweertalk 10:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've placed a tag on the article requesting speedy deletion, since it is still here. It can't be uploaded again, though, unless the flickr license is modified or unless permission is verified through writing or at that page. User:Pixelord, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials if you are interested in donating the image. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for removing the photo in such a first notice! Moonriddengirl, I'll check the link and arrange to donate the photo to Wikipedia as soon as possible. Thanks. --User:Pixelord
Thanks Moonriddengirl for your attempt. -- Tanweertalk 09:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Photo:Victoria memorial hall

Hello

[edit]

Hi Tanweer Morshed, hope you're well. As an editor who has used the services of the Guild of Copy Editors, I thought you might be interested in knowing that the Guild is currently holding elections for its coordinators. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit the election page. Thanks! – SMasters (talk) 14:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.......bhai valo asen porikha shes apnaka ami onek din pai na:

[edit]

bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakkhar (talk • contribs) 12:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

[edit]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanking you for your great contribution on article Dhaka Residential Model College. --Rossi101 (talk) 09:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Rossi101[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bengali culture

[edit]

Template:Bengali culture has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chandan Guha (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Invitation to join WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League

[edit]

Invitation to Join the WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League!

[edit]

শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২১!

[edit]
. শুভ নববর্ষ (Happy Bengali New Year)

সময় হল একটি বছর-কে বিদায় দেয়ার। সময় হল বছর-টিকে হারিয়ে জেতে দেবার,কালের অনন্ত ধারায়। তবে নতুন বছরে সবার কামনা হক সুখের, এবং শান্তির। নতুন বছরে সবাই ভাল থাকবে, সুখে থাকবে এটাই হোক সবার কামনা। নতুন বছরে সবাই সুখে থাকুক, শান্তি-তে থাকুত, সকলের মঙ্গল হোক। পুরানো বছরের ভুল ভ্রান্তি পেছনে ফেলে সবাই সামনে এগিয়ে যাক। এই কামনা। বিদায় ১৪২০, স্বাগতম ১৪২১। সবাইকে জানাই

শুভ নববর্ষ। -- প্রত্যয় (শুভ নববর্ষ!) 14:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! 220 of Borg 15:43, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 220, yeah you are right. I should have filled in the field. This won't happen from the next time, hopefully. Thanks :) Tanweertalk 16:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It always helps other editors understand what's happening. 220 of Borg 16:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ya, I too find it useful when paroling in the RecentChanges. Tanweertalk 17:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Museum of Independence, Dhaka, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mughal and Bengali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

[edit]
A Barnstar!
Please participate
There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. nafSadh did say 14:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join discussion

[edit]

I would like to request you to join this discussion, please. It's about removing some specific people from the voting list. Please read through what has already been discussed and state your opinion, it will be appreciated.

Thanks

Rihaz (Talk to me • What I do) 17:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ratification of collage at Talk:Bengali people

[edit]

Hi, you previously voted in a poll at Talk:Bengali people to decide on whose pictures are to appear in a collage at Bengali people. The poll has now closed and a request for ratification of the final list has been sent out. If you wish to do so, please come to Talk:Bengali people thanks Coolabahapple (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Zindabad

[edit]

Mukti Bahini was a terrorist organization who helped hindus during Bangladesh Liberation War. Muslims must join the discussion at talk pages of Mukti Bahini and Bangladesh Liberation War[1]--------------------And I request Muslims must delete this page 1971 Bangladesh genocide Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bangali pigs (talk • contribs) 04:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://takbeeremusalsal.blogspot.de/2012/03/indian-mukti-bahani-terrorism-massacres.html

Possibly unfree File:Comilla Victoria College Sriti Shoudho.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comilla Victoria College Sriti Shoudho.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 08:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

[edit]
A Barnstar!
Please comment
There's a afd going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. More participation is needed. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mak Yuree

[edit]

Just wanted to tell you I think you've done a good job with this article. You've added independent sources and put together a far more WP:NPOV article. I think you've done enough to reasonably argue that he meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Papaursa! Thanks for the compliment. I knew that the article was deleted twice previously due to heavy overestimation and unusual stuffs. I just started it to make a reasonably fair article. And I tried for that. The rest would be amended by others, if possible. Thanks :) Tanweertalk 20:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Annapurna I Main may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Annapurna I Central]] ({{convert|8051|m|0|abbr=on}}}
  • File:Annapurna massif.jpg|The Annapurna massif, seen from Poon Hill]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:HSBC Chittagong.jpg listed for deletion on Wikimedia Commons

[edit]
An image or media file you uploaded or altered, commons:File:HSBC Chittagong.jpg, has been listed at Commons Deletion requests.

You can read and participate in the deletion discussion if you are interested or do not wish the file to be deleted. Thank you. Gunnex (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Tanweer Morshed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]

Hello Tanweer Morshed: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Tanweer Morshed. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Dhaka

[edit]

Portal:Dhaka, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Dhaka and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Dhaka during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tanweer 1.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Tanweer 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammadpur Preparatory School & College

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammadpur Preparatory School & College, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bengalpatriot71 (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayesha Aziz Khan

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayesha Aziz Khan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Projects for Humanity for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Projects for Humanity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projects for Humanity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayesha Aziz Khan

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayesha Aziz Khan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ayesha Aziz Khan moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ayesha Aziz Khan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv🍁 15:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]
Happy New Year!
Hello Tanweer Morshed:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Proposed deletion of Faysal Kabir

[edit]
Notice

The article Faysal Kabir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 11:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I've disabled this account until you can explain what was going on with the edits at User:Tanweer Morshed/sandbox/ECG, and the relationship of this account to Limbo.J (talk · contribs). That material was sketchy blackhat garbage, and the usage of a completely fake "CBS" site was about as deceptive as it gets. Sam Kuru (talk) 20:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sam Kuru, I created the draft article on my sandbox because I recently heard about this company from a friend of mine who works for the company, and I wanted to write an article about that company following Wikipedia guidelines. At first I thought about the notability of the company as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Guidelines and then wrote the article following Wikipedia guidelines. I would ask you to explain why did you delete the page, and why did you think the draft was not following Wikipedia guidelines?

If the CBS site was fake then I would remove the CBS reference from the article.

As for Limbo.J (talk · contribs), I neither do know that user nor do I have any relation with that account.

If you're sceptic about the company about which I wrote the draft, then would you explain me why these articles (Climate Change Capital, Capital Fund Management) exist on Wikipedia even though they contain more or less the same amount of references as my draft?

I intend to write an article about the company following Wikipedia guidelines, and I seek your constructive opinion in this regard. I'm completely okay with refraining from writing article about the company if that does not qualify Wikipedia's guideline.

Tanweer Morshed (talk) 02:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, slick. The sources you used are 1) a fake sustainability blog created two weeks ago with fake authors and originally created by a PR agency ("registered and incorporated in the British Virgin Islands"), 2) a fraud site mocked up to look like the real CBS site, 3) two press release reprints, 4) another completely fake site, designed to look like BI. I can see you also hit the blacklist trying to add another known SEO fake blog. The more I dig on this, the worse it looks.Sam Kuru (talk) 04:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment Sam Kuru. Okay I understand that the BI, CBS and sustainability blog are not reliable sources, and so I'll remove them. Do you have any other constructive suggestions about the article? I want to create an article following Wikipedia guidelines. Tanweer Morshed (talk) 05:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're deliberately missing the point. You're working with a group of people that are committing fraud. A competent person would immediately do more research and find better "friends".Sam Kuru (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tanweer_Morshed&oldid=1257773303"