User talk:TDI19

Welcome!

Hello, TDI19! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ThaddeusB (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you for registering. I have copied my comments from your anon-IP to here for your convenience. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super Stars of Dance

Hello,

The best thing to do would be to copy the episode 1 table and just change all the info. (Shows are normally given a separate section for each episode). Summary tables can then be added to show who was eliminated, etc. I'll go ahead and copy and blank the table to make it easier to add the info...

--ThaddeusB (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I copied the episode 1 table and commented the whole thing out to keep it from displaying. I decided it was easier to edit with the old data as place holders. To make it show up after it is updated, just delete the line that starts "" (found immediately before and after the table). If you don't finish the whole thing, that's OK just hit save with the comment lines still intact and drop me a line so I can finish it. Thanks --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another helpful tip for you: If you want, you may copy the contents of a page\section you want to work & paste them on to User:TDI19/Sandbox. You can save interim\test edits all you want (to avoid losing your progress, for example) in your personal Sandbox without fear of causing problems. When its done, just copy back it to the main article (but be careful not to override new content contributed by others in the mean time). Personally, I just use the "preview changes" button, but some users prefer the sandbox method. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you...

put this back in eva's section in the tdi character's page?

"In the 15th episode (No Pain, No Game), both Eva and Izzy were both brought back to the island. Eva targeted Bridgette for saying that she needed to take anger-management classes when she was originally voted off. Eva also harbours a dislike towards Ezekiel for his sexist against females, however it is not shown in any other episodes if this continues. Everyone on the island (except for Duncan) voted her off in the 15th episode, as Duncan voted for Heather, just as Eva did. In Eva's voting tape, she declared that they better not say her name unless they want to leave in body bags. Due to her anger (again) she was voted off also making her the 13th camper voted off, and was sent away in a straight jacket to prevent her from attacking the other campers. However, in "After the Dock of Shame", Eva found a new target, Heather, realizing by now that Bridgette had nothing to do with Eva's initial elimination with Heather being the real culprit, insulting Heather by calling her a "scum-sucking, backstabbing witch". Eva came in both 21st and 15th place."

Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 00:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Total Drama Action has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://totaldramaisland.blogspot.com/2009/02/thats-all-folks.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TDA article getting Hijacked

Hello. Could you get in contact with an administrator soon? The Total Drama Action article is being turned into others personal website/playground and thus being ravaged. All corrections are being undone and all requests to stop are being ignored. Thank You.--Halls452 (talk) 04:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know, someone just posted about 60 edits in a row. Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 04:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About the TDA Article

Since you're one of the most sensible editors for this article, is there a way that you can stop these "Glen5544" and "TDAFanatic" users from editing it into such nonsense. I'm not entirely sure on how to do it myself (if there even is a way). I would really appreciate it if there's a way to do that. Thanks, -Bbhinton15 (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

They've just hijacked it again with Sshafiee1659, and turning it into their personal website/toy. Is there anything we can do as they don't seem to get it. Thanks. --Halls452 (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hate to say it but "Here we go again!!" User talk:Sshafiee1659 has struck again despite all warnings and calls to stop. --Halls452 (talk) 02:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tdi/TDA episodes & Characters...

Could you check to see everythings Okay in List of Total Drama Island episodes & List of characters from Total Drama Island articles? I not too sure about all the info. Thanks --Halls452 (talk) 19:52, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how things been? Sorry to bother you but could you help with the TDI/TDA articles again? Some still insist on"

Putting spoilers without permission of the producers,
Putting up unsourced "info" without permission,
Putting up predictions, fanfiction, and other false info,

This despite been told it is against Wikipedia policy. Also it seems there is now an issue about "spoilers" for the audience in the U.S. as well (i.e. should we put info on TDA until after they broadcast in the U.S. even though the show is from CANADA! Please, help straighten this out.--Halls452 (talk) 01:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: TDWT

I hate to say it, but I've just let the Total Drama articles slide for a while. There were too many IPs coming in and messing up the table. I figured I'll just wait until the season is over and/or there's some discussion on the talk page, then jump back in. —C.Fred (talk) 00:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Designstarlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Designstarlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Design Star 5 Cast.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Design Star 5 Cast.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Design Star 5 Cast.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Design Star 5 Cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Designstarlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Designstarlogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Design Star 5 Cast.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Design Star 5 Cast.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Praise for the Template idea

Good idea, TDI19. I am impressed. DESIGN STAR IS REALLY COOL! (RealityShowsRock (talk) 00:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, I mean the table to template idea. And yeah, I would prefer Emily than Michael, even though she wasn't trying in her first design. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 00:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Continuing the conversation from yesterday

My favorite was Alex after the third week of elimination or so, and I liked Casey better than Emily, I was surprised she was 3rd. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 11:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

TOTAL DRAMA ROLEPLAY

Ever heard of Total Drama Roleplay on Total Drama Wiki. It's where u basically get to play a character on Total Drama and compete like that character. Antoniocruzazul and is portraying Duncan. ON MY TALK PAGE, tell me which charatcer you would like to be, and you're good. BYE. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 21:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

TDI19, u r right!

Somewhat of a know-it-all 20Dragon undid ur edit, but ur 100% right. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 01:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hey now. That's a little mean. When did I act like a know-it-all? Twentydragon 12:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Srry. I was kind of grouchy when I wrote that. But TDI19 was right. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 21:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TDWT Elimination Table

Template:TDWT Elimination Table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Nilocia (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TDA Elimination Table

Template:TDA Elimination Table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Nilocia (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

No I am not that person. CrazyC83 (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken Identity

You seem to be under the impression that I have recently vandalized the Total Drama Island Article, per C.fred. While I do not expect you to believe me, I am not that person. I have never even seen the article, and have no interest in it.

24.185.237.212 (talk) 15:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Antoniocruzazul is Duncan

(RealityShowsRock (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Re: Total Drama drama

The IP(s) from my talk page weren't blocked as a result of your actions. Jcarleo (talk · contribs) got blocked a while back for vandalism; those IPs are connected with him. And Jcarleo hasn't been banned yet, but he is close. —C.Fred (talk) 03:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rights for reviewing

Greetings! I saw your request. I looked at your edit history, which is in order. Based on that and on your activity on a page still under pending changes review, I decided to give you the reviewer permission. Then I saw that you're already a rollbacker, so that was another reason to do it. Make sure you've read WP:Reviewing, of course, and enjoy the reviewing rights! —C.Fred (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DWTS Season 11 Week 4

If you average the technique and performance scores first, and someone has an odd total (in technique+performance), they're going to end up with a total like 120.5. The .5 can't be there because half points don't exist on the show. This consensus was reached last season. Onesmallnote (talk) 00:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding. I wish there was a better way to do this, and if the half-point thing didn't happen I'd totally agree with you. But the way a friend explained it to me is because the points are out of 60, it is like two dances. I don't know. Anyway, thanks! Onesmallnote (talk) 00:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DWTS S11 Week 7

Question, for the best dance chart, should we take off the judges score for that, too? Because I'm pretty sure everyone is going to score above a 30, so that means all six of these people would have this week's dance listed as their best dance, when it kind of seems like if they get a 30 on a dance that should/would be listed. Does that make sense? Onesmallnote (talk) 01:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Sing-Off (season 2)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The Sing-Off (season 2), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Sing-Off. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Sing-Off into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TDI19. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tropical Storm Ernesto

Sorry I changed your edits. I was doing the same update and got an edit conflict so I pasted right over your version. United States Man (talk) 20:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Burn

I might be wrong, but Playiga.com doesn't strike me as a credible/reliable source. Also, there is nothing at AllAccess.com or Radio and Records indicating an October 1 radio release for "Burn". We should probabaly leave it out until the release is confirmed by one of the two aforementioned sources. Snap Snap 19:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ellie Goulding discography

Hi! Do you have the source for the new UK peak position of "How Long Will I Love You"? Such changes always require a new source, especially when it comes to positions outside the UK top 100. The same goes for manually formatted charts. Snap Snap 00:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Felicia Barton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:TDI19/Sandbox

User:TDI19/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TDI19/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TDI19/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TDI19. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TDI19. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deal or No Deal 2018 Models

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I was the one who added most of the models for the upcoming season. I'm terrible for the most part figuring out who's who or who is in who's positions in the photos you sourced, so I left them TBA at the time. If you do know for sure, thank you. Anyways, I found one of the models posted a good quality photo of all of them together. I uploaded the image to Deal or No Deal Wikia, so if you are good at figuring out who is who, etc, please, check it out. (And you can click on the image on that link to make it EVEN BIGGER!) Thanks. Magitroopa (talk) 03:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to August 13 did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been undone. If you restore it, please provide a direct reliable source. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 04:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TDI19. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]