User talk:Complexity1
Welcome!
|
Minor edits
[edit]I suggest you look at Help:Minor edit to see when this box should be clicked. No substantial revision should be so tagged. The content of the edits are fine, however. Clean Copytalk 22:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Question about your edit request
[edit]Hi, I looked at your edit request for russians at war and I am wondering, are you asking only for the title to change or for the entire section to be replaced with yours? thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 11:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @User:Cooldudeseven7 Thank you for looking at it. I suggested changing the entire section - which I took from proposed edits of other editors. I just verified the sources and voted for inclusion of this section. I saw it emerged 2 days ago but now it is gone again! The editor User:Manyareasexpert, who is (considering the history of edits) mostly edits and censors pages related to Ukraine, nothing else - keeps cutting the new edits out. I wonder if the case should be escalated for constant vandalism for review as it is a stalemate. The page meanwhile is outdated. The most impressive collection of sources and a good structure of the page was recently proposed on the Talk page by the User:EVS-VR. I wonder if you can have a look at it too - perhaps we can post that one and then protect it? Somebody posted it replacing the outdated page several days ago, but User:Manyareasexpert again reversed it. This is vandalism, as I know it. Complexity1 (talk) 02:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. I have been told to decline your edit request as suggested changes are contradicting the sources( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 11:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @User:Cooldudeseven7, Who exactly "told you to decline" the edit request - have you checked their neutrality, I wonder? Also, if nobody can just tell you to decline the request if the edit adds missing references and information. The edit of this page is obviously highjacked by people with emotional attitude related to the war in Ukraine to such degree that they compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Please review the edits and decide for yourself, not under the pressure of people, who, considering their former edits, are very biased on this issue. Complexity1 (talk) 21:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I would like to give a more in-depth reason for the declined edit request.
- 1st: Editors said that suggested changes are contradicting the sources.
- 2nd: An ongoing discussion war is ongoing with the editors at the moment.
- I do like your edit request, however at the moment, I will answer it later.
Note: I suggest you read the ongoing discussions on the talk page of the article.
- Hi, I would like to give a more in-depth reason for the declined edit request.
- @User:Cooldudeseven7, Who exactly "told you to decline" the edit request - have you checked their neutrality, I wonder? Also, if nobody can just tell you to decline the request if the edit adds missing references and information. The edit of this page is obviously highjacked by people with emotional attitude related to the war in Ukraine to such degree that they compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Please review the edits and decide for yourself, not under the pressure of people, who, considering their former edits, are very biased on this issue. Complexity1 (talk) 21:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. I have been told to decline your edit request as suggested changes are contradicting the sources( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 11:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
On another note, due to the ongoing argument, I am not sure if this edit request is controversial at the moment.
- Thank you, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 14:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Notification of ANI discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
Your edit to Michael Clarke (academic) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.