User talk:Steph.tsaii/National Kaohsiung Center for the Arts

Hi, I'm starting to walk through articles and give everyone informal early feedback on how they're doing. You'll notice this is a little bit form-letter-ish but I hope it is still helpful!

One area to improve for this article is your use of sources and citations. Right now what I see is a fair bit of text being added without the sources to back it up.

Another area to improve as you revise is maintaining a "Neutral Point of View" about this topic. You'll find more ideas in this Wikipedia policy: WP:NPOV. The language sounds a little too much like an advertisement and not enough of an independent article. If you're using the organization's own website, remember they're in the business of making themselves sound as good as possible. There's more detail about this issue in this policy: WP:OWNSITE -- the site has a conflict of interest when it speaks about itself.

My general take right now is that you're making good progress on this article, so please keep working. Be sure to incorporate feedback from the peer review. You might find it helpful to apply the peer review guide to your own article as you think about where to go next.

It looks like you made some edits while you were putting the article into your sandbox. Is that right? I'm mostly noting this here so that we keep track and check the original version when we're grading.

Kaylea Champion (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review from Megan Wang:

Hi Steph! I peer reviewed your article and made some changes on grammars and some sentence orderings. Overall the content is great. However, I feel like the second paragraph of the lead section and the introduction paragraph of the architecture section has some overlaps that might not be necessary. Keep up the great work :)

Go-Live Approval

Hi @Steph.tsaii:

This looks ok to go live on Wikipedia. The sourcing is expanded, but in some cases it looks like you have more sources than you do, because there are multiple links to the same site. So I think this is a little bit borderline. But you can keep adding content after go-live. I think it needs a bit more, but I understand it's hard to do. Have there been any particularly famous or historic performances? Awards? Controversies? I am looking at the article for the Sydney Opera House as a source of ideas for kinds of details to add.

As a reminder, here are our go-live steps:

Final read-through draft.
Check live article for changes. [History Tab]
Two browsers side by side, if you can. Code mode, not visual editor.
Paragraph by paragraph copy, leaving behind an explanatory edit summary after each chunk of changes.
Note on article talk page.
Note at the top of your sandbox version.
Submit a link to your article on Canvas.
Celebrate!

Kaylea Champion (talk) 08:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Made Changes on Article

Hi! I have made changes to the live article. I have added more information to the lead, history, and architecture section. I also added four sub headlines under the architecture section to introduce the different halls in the arts center. Please feel free to leave a message on the talk page if there are any other changes I could make! Steph.tsaii (talk) 05:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]