User talk:PHILA19147

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Smel4727, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pizza Brain, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, PHILA19147, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! IZAK 04:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Epic Barnstar
		for expanding Philadelphia Stars (baseball) from a stub to a complete, well documented article. Your fine work is noticed and appreciated. BRMo (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Jackie Robinson infobox

FYI, I opened a discussion of a recent edit you made to the Jackie Robinson infobox and its subsequent reversion. If you'd like to contribute to the discussion, please see Talk:Jackie Robinson#1945 Negro League All Star game. BRMo (talk) 03:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Home run is two words

That is all! ; ) Majorclanger (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Please note that when citing sources, websites are "works", not "publishers". When filling out the citation template, please use the name of the website in the |work= parameter, and include the publishing company in the |publisher= parameter. For example, when citing a work from the New York Times website, the work is |work=NYTimes.com, and the publisher is |publisher=New York Times (linking optional). Thank you! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Hilldale Club appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Megaman en m (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

about neutrality

Among the many great players to grace Hilldale's roster were

This is not what I call neutral.--Megaman en m (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well then I guess it's just a misunderstanding.--Megaman en m (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1934 series between American Giants and Stars

The generally assumed reason for the delay during the series was simply that there were still other games being scheduled. IIRC, both teams engaged in a 4-team double-header in Yankee Stadium (with the Black Yankees and Crawfords) during that period, and there may have been more exhibitions. Throughout its history, it seems to me that the Negro Leagues had a sharper eye out for making a buck (and surviving) than worrying about how clear and standardized its championship series were. -- Couillaud (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linking seasons in player articles

We are currently discussing this topic of linking seasons from years at the Baseball WikiProject talk page. Could you please join that discussion? KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mets-Phillies

I saw your additions; I actually went through and fixed some formatting things and added some other references. I didn't see any support in the provided reference for half the fans being Mets fans, though, so it had to go. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 22:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And with you. Cheers! Have a star. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 22:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Fightin' PhilStar
		For your continued work on the Mets-Phillies rivalry article. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 22:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With the quality info you've located and added to this article, we've got a great chance at nominating this for good article in the near future! Keep it up! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 14:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip of the cap to you as well; I would have had no idea where to look for all of this new info. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 14:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great info, thanks. I'll start looking for more info for the recent history section (2000-present). KV5 (Talk • Phils)

What a quote! You keep earning that star; great work! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've been a major contributor to the above article, I wanted to let you know that I am nominating it for good article status. Thanks a lot for all of your contributions! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 15:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of those things that you mentioned are great fodder for the "regional proximity" section, which really can be broken down into "Causes". I have some good sources for the treatment of Robinson that I used in Whiz Kids that I can incorporate into this article as well. A good article doesn't have to be perfectly exhaustive either; as long as it's complete and covers the major points in a neutral and referenced way, it can pass. Featured article would be the next goal after that. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 20:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Iverson

Minor quibble here, but right now, the news is that he accepted, but not yet signed, the offer. Until he puts his pen to a piece of paper, he's not yet on the team, and before he can sign, he has to pass a physical. I'm not going to touch your edit, but I wanted you to know why I changed your earlier edit. Cheers. --Mosmof (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yeah, I didn't want to get into an edit war over a technicality that's going to be moot in a couple of days. Mosmof (talk) 15:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Negro league baseball task force

As part of WikiProject Baseball, I've set up a new Negro league baseball task force page. I intend it to be a place where editors who are interested on these articles can communicate with each other and coordinate our work. I'd like to invite you to add your name to the task force here, or if you'd prefer not do that, at least invite you to add the page to your watch list. Thanks. BRMo (talk) 02:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phillies all-time team

Thanks for adding the Phillies all-time team (1969). Great work! Eagle4000 (talk) 04:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing Shibe Park...

Thank you for the kind words about Shibe Park. They mean all the more to me, coming from you — your "byline" is involved in many articles I've enjoyed! I hope you got to see the Shibe article a few weeks back when it still had the photo of the 2001 commemorative postage stamp: it was a great way to wrap up the tale, all clean and new again after the long sad decline — but a crusading photo deletionist decided its presence there would cause the collapse of western civilization and yanked it despite consensus to keep it. Should you cross paths with Delaywaves or Baseball Bugs, please mention to them that you like Shibe Park — they worked hard on it also. Anyway, thanks again for your note, it made my week! — HarringtonSmith (talk) 19:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PHILA19147. You have new messages at CatcherStorm's talk page.
Message added 16:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Society Hill, Philadelphia

Please provide a source for the information you added to this article. I didn't revert your edit, but it does need to be sourced. BMK (talk) 23:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dock Street Market, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edmund Bacon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PHILA19147. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interview with Jewish Exponent

Hello,

  My name is Eric Schucht and I'm a reporter for the Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia. I'm writing an article on the history behind the Wikipedia page on the History of the Jews in Philadelphia. I saw that you made some major edits to the page a while back and I was wondering if you'd be willing to talk to me about why you decided to add to the page, what exactly you added and what lead you to edit Wikipedia pages in general. Please feel free to email me if you're interested.

Thank you,

Eric Schucht eschucht@jewishexponent.com

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:PiedmontBollWeevils2.GIF

Thank you for uploading File:PiedmontBollWeevils2.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khartoum (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nubian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Additionally, please read WP:WESTBANK. Thank you. nableezy - 05:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Benjamin Waxman

The page Benjamin Waxman has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Expired PROD, concern was: Not Notable / Self-promotion

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrei Doroshin

Hi, I saw you reverted an edit on the Thomas Farley article due to a bias towards Doroshin. The same editor has created Andrei Doroshin, which I believe is also written from a non-neutral POV. You seem to know more about the topic and I'm quite green in this area (both Wikipedia-wise and about covid testing in Philadelphia). I have created a neutrality dispute on Talk:Andrei Doroshin and I'd appreciate your input. Rostipe (talk) 17:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barrack

How do you have access to sources for the Cougar Chronicle? The sources are quite old since the Chronicle has only been online for two years. Are you a former student or teacher with access to old copies? Please let me know. I'd love to see them! Pennsylvania2 (talk) 18:47, 22 February 2022 (UTC) User:Pennsylvania2 What is your email? PHILA19147 (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Ballpark

I appreciate that somebody finally created an article on The Ballpark (Gainesville), which I've mentioned in other articles covering early Florida Gator sports but didn't really know much about. As you may have seen, I was inspired to find a couple sources and expand it quite a bit. You mentioned in the intro and the infobox that the ballpark hosted the Phillies for spring training in the 1890s, but I couldn't find a citation so I didn't include that factoid in the body text. Where did you find that info? Organized spring training didn't really get going until the early 1900s, but I do know that professional teams would sometimes tour small towns in the weeks leading up to the regular season. I assume that's what the Phillies did in Gainesville, but we should find a good source to verify that assumption so the statement can remain in the lead and be explained in the history section.

Also, we were apparently editing the article at the same time earlier today but I think I preserved your info and references; sorry if I missed something. Thanks, and good stuff! Zeng8r (talk) 20:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and thank YOU for picking up and running with it! ... In my research, I've found that baseball teams were going south to fixed locations in Florida, Georgia, Virginia, etc... as early as the late 1880s and early 1890s. I have citations for the Phillies from the Philadelphia Inquirer in 1892. When I have a moment, I will add a couple to the article with references. Thank you again for this note, and your work on the article! PHILA19147 (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also: (1) Do you know if a contemporary photo exists for the field? I'd love to add it to the article. (2) I'm not connected to Gainesville or UF; would it be possible to obtain a picture of the historic marker to post to the article as well? Ty! PHILA19147 (talk) 17:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be in Gainesville this weekend and will probably have time to swing to get a current photo. Never seen a pic of the field in its heyday, though. The best place to look would probably be the UF archives - don't have time to dig into this today, but here's the link if you want to take a look: https://universityarchives.uflib.ufl.edu/ Zeng8r (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! It would be great to have a current photo. Thank you for the archives link; I'll take a look. PHILA19147 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photo looks great! Thank you! This is Wikipedia at its very best. PHILA19147 (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

bows

Also, I finally found a photo of a football game at the field in 1907. (Calling it "primitive" was being generous, lol.) I'll upload the "new" photo and tweak the spring training paragraph a little bit, and then we can proudly declare this a successful Wikiquest. Zeng8r (talk) 22:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(A) 1907 is a great find! (B) It's not clear the Phillies were first MLB team in Florida; 1892 was definitely first year the Phillies trained in Florida. I clarified the paragraph so this is clear. PHILA19147 (talk) 01:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is more your area of expertise than mine, but are you sure that the Phillies didn't train in Florida before 1892? The Grapefruit League section of the spring training article says they came down to Jacksonville a couple years earlier, and while there's a citation for that statement, it's behind a paywall. I also found this article from the Philadelphia Inquirer on the topic but it's locked for non-subscribers. Sports was largely undocumented in those days so it's hard to pin these things down. Zeng8r (talk) 16:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is very cool, and I stand corrected. I've worked my research back to 1891 for the Phillies so far, and had not reached 1889. I will update the article. I have complete access to the Inquirer archives. PHILA19147 (talk) 16:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff. I'd love to research things like this all day but alas my schedule does not allow it. Zeng8r (talk) 15:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PHILA19147. Thank you for your work on Latta Park Baseball Field. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! I just realized that Charlotte Hornets stadium hasn't got their article yet!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VetVoiceFoundationLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VetVoiceFoundationLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Temple Beth Zion-Beth Israel has been accepted

Temple Beth Zion-Beth Israel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]