User talk:Orbitrack~enwiki

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Skylar Jean, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Skylar Jean! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Benedict Cumberbatch

A friendly warning, the edits you are making to Benedict Cumberbatch and Anna James are an awful lot like the edits another user made while also using sockpuppetry to edit under 2 other accounts. They were blocked around the same time as your account was created so I would tread lightly by reverting edits. Read up on what wikipedia is and is not. And internet memes are not appropriate for an encyclopedic purpose. Lady Lotus • talk 20:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-- I have also been doing edits in other pages. I've deleted the sentence about the fanart and stuff. I just thought that it was worth noting since it has been discussed by trusted sources. I've already made a talk page about it for discussion.

Even if it's discussed on trusted sources doesn't necessary mean it belongs on Wikipedia. Again, a quick read on what Wikipedia is not would just help in future edits. Lady Lotus • talk 20:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you continue to revert editors after being told to wait for WP:CONSENSUS then you are close to edit warring which can cause you to be blocked. Lady Lotus • talk 21:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lady Lotus • talk 13:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fairyspit (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]