User talk:Seasider53/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Draft:One Monument Square

Hi Seasider, you may be interested in expanding Draft:One Monument Square, which I recently started.--User:Namiba 13:46, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Augustus W. Corliss.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Augustus W. Corliss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Edit

Hi, can I ask why you edited Brighton and Hove page please Tiblington (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Casco Bay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ragged Island.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Lane Morrison.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Lane Morrison.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sunderland A.F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to article, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please refrain from repetitive removal of information about clubs history. IGrisha (talk)

Three-revert rule warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IGrisha (talk)

Curtis Nelson

Curtis Nelson has signed a 2 year contract with Derby County.. link to BBC sport page for a source on this [1]https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/66001758 MiamiCally (talk) 14:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Excellent. Seems it has now been added to the article. Seasider53 (talk) 15:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. IGrisha (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1807 establishments in North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Category:1807 establishments in North Carolina indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Churches in Braemar

A tag has been placed on Category:Churches in Braemar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wetter House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Please correct your reports at ANI

Hello. While I agree with the content of your recent ANI reports, filing two different reports on the same issue is not helpful. Please combine them into one report. The issue is 100% the same, the last thing we need on ANI is double discussions. Cheers Jeppiz (talk) 10:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Spelling of "grandaughter"

Hello, Seasider53. You reverted my update to Joseph Cerveau where I corrected the spelling of this word. So I checked three dictionaries (Oxford, Collins, and Macquarie) - not one of them lists the spelling you used. Can you cite a source for why you insist on the spelling "grandaughter" instead of the "granddaughter" or "grand daughter" which all of those dictionaries do recognize? Gronk Oz (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

You’re ignoring the maintenance tag on the article, which is not good etiquette. Seasider53 (talk) 00:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Agreed. But nor is it good etiquette to leave that tag in place for so long; it should only be used "for a short period of time, no greater than a few hours". Some people might ask whether the article was ready to publish in mainspace in that case, but let's stick to the point - that spelling is still wrong and I maintain the correction should stand. But you still have left the error there - is there a reason?--Gronk Oz (talk) 10:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Interesting

Did you know this was a thing? I just came across it today, and recognised your name at #51. Now you're under pressure to keep it up... Girth Summit _(blether) 15:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Down to #53 already. Such is life. Seasider53 (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Eh? That was probably me misremembering the figure - I don't see how it could change in less than a day! I reckon they shouldn't have the bots listed - having a bot do your editing for you feels like cheating. I counted 23 bots above you're name, so by the power invested in my by myself, I officially name you #30. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

I'd like to thank the vandals of the world, since at least half of my daily edits are reversions. I don't think that makes a difference...? Seasider53 (talk) 22:23, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coastal Maine Botanical Garden logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coastal Maine Botanical Garden logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

RE: Released players

I have just been copying everyone else who also do the same, if that is wrong I apologize, but my understanding was that if in same transfer window then the edit applies in these sections. Skyblueshaun (talk) 11:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coastliner bus company logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coastliner bus company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Govvy (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pineland Farms.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pineland Farms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Portland, Maine

What is the issue with posting a nice pic of the downtown on the Portland, Maine page? I took the photo myself. Anyone anywhere can have it. Metrodogmedia (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure about other editors, but my concern is that both of the photos I deleted were low quality. Please take a moment to read MOS:IMAGEQUALITY. --Magnolia677 (talk) 21:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Harry Kane. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lourdes 07:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

• For your benefit, [2][3][4][5]. Four reverts, within 24 hours; not allowed my friend. As you did not acknowledge this in the ANI report, I am left with no option but to block you to prevent further disruption. Please take care in the future. Thanks, Lourdes 08:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Huh – well, I guess this worked out perfectly timing-wise. Seasider53 (talk) 10:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Reliable sources

I have a genuine question. Is there a Wikipedia article that showcases a list of different news outlets or websites that are considered reliable and/or unreliable? That would be very beneficial as a source of reference. Also, thank you for informing me about that article about Rachel Grae in reference to popsugar.com. But why is it generally considered to be an unreliable source. That certain editor on this encyclopedia never went on to explain why... Bibliophile Dragon (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

See WP:NOT RELIABLE. Also, many perennial unreliable sources have shortcuts, such as WP:DAILYMAIL. Seasider53 (talk) 20:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edwin Mayberry

The article Edwin Mayberry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found of any notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edgar Champlin Anderson

The article Edgar Champlin Anderson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found of any notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Disupute resolution

This is a formal notice of a dispute you are involved in being listed for dispute resolution. The discussion to the dispute resolution can be found here on the dispute resolution notice board PicturePerfect666 (talk) 22:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Edwin Mayberry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edwin Mayberry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Mayberry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 06:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Washington Street (Massachusetts)

The article Washington Street (Massachusetts) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hopelessly flawed article; there are HUNDREDS of "Washington Streets" in Massachusetts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 08:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)