User talk:Sam1liverpool

Welcome!

Hello, Sam1liverpool, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Betrinac, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gtwfan52 (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Betrinac

A tag has been placed on Betrinac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Betrinac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betrinac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betrinac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 20:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Betrinac

Hi, Sam. I am glad you have come to Wikipedia. This is a very informative article with great potential; one that should now stay without a lot of problems. A couple of small points: 1)You should keep your citations in a uniform style. I have taken care of that for you and run the "Reflinks" tool on them to make them more readable. 2)The manual of style should have a basic layout for an article on a drug. You should check for that and try to format the article in that style. If there isn't one in the manual, you'd be well served by checking out a few existing drug articles and trying to copy their style. Why? When you pick up the good old Encyclopedia Britannica, you'll notice that articles on similar subjects look similar. It allows the reader to be able to quickly locate the particular information they are looking for without having to necessarily read the whole article.

I think taking out the hyperlinks to the drug's website and the two companies websites made the piece look a lot less promotional. The information is still there, but with it buried in the reference section, the article looks much less like you are trying to promote it.

Also, you seem to know quite a bit about this subject. If you are connected to the company that owns the patent, Wikipedia policy requires you to disclose this. You should read WP:COI and if you feel it is applicable, place the {{Connected contributor}} template on the articles talk page. Great work, Sam. You worked with the process rather than fighting it. It is refreshing. If I can ever be of assistance, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears this article is not doing too well at AfD. You can view the discussion here. You can weigh in with your opinion, but just that you think it is good is not worthy of inclusion in arguments there. You will need to find and quote Wikipolicy as to why it should stay. You have two references from reliable sources (BBC and The Daily Mail). You could argue that make it notable. And, just so you understand, it is ALREADY "published", if you will. The discussion is whether to delete it. It would help if there were some mention of the research into vitamin therapy at either Alzheimer's disease or Dementia that were wikilinked back to this article, but you will have to be very brief and have complete reliable references for whatever you put into those articles. Hope that helps. Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied as requested to User:Sam1liverpool/Betrinac Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Betrinac.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 09:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Sam1liverpool, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 01:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Betrinac, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 15:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Betrinac.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anderson - What's up? 07:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Betrinac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betrinac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betrinac (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]