User talk:Romi0199

Deletion of "Laravel (framework)" article

Hello there! Please, have a look at this thread. — Dsimic (talk) 01:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for messaging me! I felt really sad when I saw the article got deleted but really astonished when I saw your discussion with admin. I really appreciate your afford and time. Now I am creating new article by using the duplicate detector. Romi0199 (talk) 17:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) I know that sinking feeling very well, so I just tried to see what could be done there, and why the article was was actually deleted. Looking forward to the new version of Laravel article! — Dsimic (talk) 18:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted just after 5 minutes of creation :( https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Laravel_framework Romi0199 (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I can't see the content, now that it's deleted again. How about asking the admins to undelete the article, and I'll go ahead and rephrase it? Would you be Ok with something like that? — Dsimic (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That would be so nice! Both Laravel (framework) and Laravel framework are showing deleted message? Can I recreate Laravel (framework) ? Actually I am new to wikipedia authoring thats why I am asking you. Romi0199 (talk) 18:35, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let me ask the admins, and see if that would be an option. You can re-create the Laravel (framework) article, of course, but that would hold up its spot and prevent the undeletion. Please, let's see first whether undeletion (+ rephrasing) is a viable option. — Dsimic (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am waiting! Romi0199 (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the question, and we're now waiting for a reply. — Dsimic (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's hope for good. Romi0199 (talk) 20:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done with the rephrasing, and now we'll see how to bring back the article. — Dsimic (talk) 22:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Awesome work! I think it's back? Romi0199 (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that was the least I could do in order to help. :) The article is back, and one of the admins is going to restore its editing history, using what's available from the previously deleted version. — Dsimic (talk) 13:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was possible for your hard working, really curious to know about you. Romi0199 (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article wouldn't be there if you haven't created it in the first place. :) Editing history is restored now, too, thank you goes to Ronhjones for doing that so quickly. — Dsimic (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.sitepoint.com/best-php-frameworks-2014/ Romi0199 (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! This looks like a good reference, and should fit well within the lead section, as a short expansion noting that Laravel is a candidate for one of the the best PHP frameworks in 2014. — Dsimic (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Please add! HNY2014 Romi0199 (talk) 05:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, please check it out. Just out of curiosity, are you using Laravel in your day-to-day work, in some PHP projects, or in another way? — Dsimic (talk) 05:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great edition! Yes, I'm using laravel. It's easy and super cool! Romi0199 (talk) 19:53, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laravel

The article Laravel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was deleted following a deletion discussion because of lack of evidence of notability, and then restored and userfied. However, the current version does not adequately address the notability issue: most references are non-independent sources (e.g. laravel's web site), some are blogs, dead links, or don't give substantial coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hello! I'm also interested in the Laravel article, as the current article version has been pretty much rewritten by myself. Will get it handled later today. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 20:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]