User talk:ComplexRational
This is ComplexRational's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Chemical study of nihonium and moscovium
[edit]Somehow I missed this from two months ago, but okay, better late than never. I think this is the first investigation of moscovium. (And it is also stated that there are promising methods for studying millisecond-lifetime Lv and Ts.) :) Double sharp (talk) 10:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Exciting news! I think Lv is doable, but I don't think chemistry of Ts can be done if the berkelium target needed for Ts production is so hard to obtain. :(
- By the way, is there any new predictions about Ts? After At is predicted to be a metal with density ~9 g/cm3, the "semimetallic" and low density of ~7 g/cm3 at the infobox of Ts looks outdated. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Nucleus hydro elemon: Not aware of any bulk predictions. I'm indeed convinced that Ts should be a metal, but the best source I have for that is just Andreas Hermann's guess in 2013 back when the metallic At prediction first came out. Double sharp (talk) 13:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- (Personally, what I wonder most about is whether Cn, Fl, and Og are metals.) Double sharp (talk) 07:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting. And it looks like Mt, Ds, and Rg will continue to be ignored, even though at least Rg is arguably more accessible than Ts (easier synthesis and longer half-lives - at least of the granddaughters of Mc). Complex/Rational 14:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- The reasoning given by their articles is there are no volatile compounds of Mt, Ds, Rg without fluorine. If we somehow managed to do SHE fluorine chemistry, then the volatile fluorides DbF5, SgF5,6, BhF5,6,7 and HsF5,6,(7,8)? can be studied. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- There's no Au hexafluoride, so I kind of doubt there is a Rg one either. Double sharp (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- The reasoning given by their articles is there are no volatile compounds of Mt, Ds, Rg without fluorine. If we somehow managed to do SHE fluorine chemistry, then the volatile fluorides DbF5, SgF5,6, BhF5,6,7 and HsF5,6,(7,8)? can be studied. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
This paper also points out that since Cn and Fl are more volatile than Nh and Mc, it could be possible to chemically detect EC in the 288Mc decay chain. Double sharp (talk) 12:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Current detectors are not sensitive towards EC, so any way that could detect it looks good. I'll look forward to 287,290Fl→Nh and 268,270Db→Rf that solves unconfirmed nuclei, but I couldn't figure out a chemical way to separate them. (Can it detect a less volatile daughter?) :\
- Mt→Hs EC is probably observable based on the reaction towards oxygen of their lighter congeners (Os forms volatile OsO4, while Ir does nothing), but sadly there might be no EC to be observed at first, and Re2O7 (the lighter congener for Bh, the α-decay product of Mt) is also quite volatile. :( Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 15:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Regarding what might be done beyond Mc. Double sharp (talk) 07:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
[edit]Hello ComplexRational: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @AntiCompositeNumber: Happy holidays to you as well! It was nice meeting you at WCNA this year and I look forward to next time. Complex/Rational 23:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Gaismagorm (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Gaismagorm: Resolved, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Complex/Rational 23:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- No problem! Gaismagorm (talk) 00:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Template:Dice
[edit]Hi, it seems that you missed two instances of this template's transclusions and they were not properly substituted at Pearson's chi-squared test and Talk:Probability/Archive 1. They now show up as links to the deleted template. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Explicit: Fixed now, thanks for informing me. Complex/Rational 23:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy New Year to you, ComplexRational!
[edit]Happy New Year! | |
Hello ComplexRational: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this messageWil540 art (talk) 14:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Wil540 art: And a happy new year to you as well! Complex/Rational 00:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Happy slightly belated New Year! :D Double sharp (talk) 06:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Double sharp: Happy new year to you too! Complex/Rational 14:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Email notice
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the SmittenGalaxy | talk! 19:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SmittenGalaxy: Handled by another admin after a brief off-wiki exchange; thanks for bringing this to my attention. Complex/Rational 23:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I sent the email before the rest of their edits; didn't even know they made more, but good to see it's been cleared up. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 10:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).
- Following an RFC, Wikipedia:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
- The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
- Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
Sat Jan 25: Wikipedia Day NYC 2025
[edit]January 25: Wikipedia Day | |
---|---|
You are invited to Wikipedia Day 2025, hosted by Wikimedia NYC at the Brooklyn Public Library's central branch. The special focus this year will be the launch of our "400 Neighborhoods" campaign for the city's 400th anniversary and WikiProject New York City/400 Task Force. We'll also have a lightning talks session and you're invited to sign up for one, though space is somewhat limited.
| |
All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct. |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)