Jump to content

User talk:JFL2422

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:RXUYDC)

Welcome!

Hello, JFL2422, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 03:44, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We can merge both as DINA if you like. I agree that most people know this company as DINA more than as Diesel Nacional. --Vizcarra 00:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AEC Contributions

[edit]

I dont know if this is the right way to contact you but its the only way I could find. Thanks for your note. I have rewriten the AEC Q page for reasons you already know as well as when i read up a bit more there were a few mixed up bits of information in there. I have found a proof reader to make sure that does not happen again. Once again thanks for your note and I shall try my best to submit other pages on the AECs. Tom 2 you 22:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Photography

[edit]

Hi RXUYDC,

Have you considered uploading future photos to Wikipedia Commons? This allows for categorization of buses of similiar type/nature, as well as cross-language Wikipedia usage (nothing is lost in the process). I'll help you in doing the trans-wiki for the existing images, and if you have any questions let me know on my talkpage. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 11:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bus manufacturers category deletion

[edit]

I notice you have deleted several articles from this category recently, and added them to a new Leyland DAF category. These companies had substantial histories in their own right, and deserve to be listed in a category that has substantial collection of articles. Please don't delete this category from any more articles. Thanks! RXUYDC 20:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment, but I deleted them because some, as you have now re-inserted, are in two+ and some three lines of the same category. I note on Leyland Trucks you have inserted again both Bus Manufacturers and Defunct Bus Manufacturers - why? They only need to go in one of these categories in the same line, the Defunct Bus Manufacturers - which I was about to insert at Leyland DAF. Please don't over categorise articles, with categories in the same line. Rgds, - Trident13 22:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with not overcategorising articles - in that spirit, lets delete the Leyland DAF category and make it a list. As to why the articles appear in the Bus Manufacturer and Defunct Bus Manufacturer categories, I'm not the person to ask. The point of my message was to ask that you not delete articles from valid categories. - RXUYDC 02:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NABI.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NABI.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, JFL2422. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]