User talk:Pmokeefe

==

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regan Hall (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regan Hall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 04:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pmokeefe, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 04:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sombrero Galaxy page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Regan Hall

Hello, Pmokeefe. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Regan Hall".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Pmokeefe. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 23:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fourier complex

I reverted the article to remove unsourced, biased content added by someone from an anonymous IP – which itself did not have a comment about why it was added. I didn't realize this would be controversial. Dylan38 (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Thanks. Dylan38 (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DGS

I actually work at DGS jake. so before you go deleting information know your own info. Buddy Ninja1518 (talk) 19:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ninja1518, the intent was not to dispute the information you provided, but it's Wikipedia policy to provide sources for information - not just personal knowledge, sorry.

Please check out Wikipedia:Citing sources.

Cheers!

Pmokeefe (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Sunnyside High School page reverted

Please look at my revisions to the article, Sunnyside High School (Sunnyside, Washington), again. I gave references for all changes I made.

Sorry, my mistake! I will restore your revisions.

Thanks!

Copyright infringement

You've been accused of that, why are you lecturing me? Regards EdwardMorris (talk) 22:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted one or more of your recent contributions to DesignSpark PCB

promotional ? That planet are you living on ?

I did remove dead links
I did fix links that got new urls
I did fix the release date + software version
Fixed the some of the wrong text
Now I will have to take my time make a complaint on you......

Regards Larsbg dk

I restored your changes, my apologies for removing the constructive material you contributed. However, your text

"is the world’s most accessible, free electronics design software, turning your circuit ideas into testable boards, faster"

does sound "promotional" in tone and may even reduce the credibility of your article - it did that for me and I used to be in the software business.

I encourage you to change that into something more neutral, similar to the previous lead.

Cheers!

Pmokeefe (talk) 23:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have now remove the citation on the wiki page i got from the webpage. Regards Larsbg dk

Nick Price

I noticed that you reverted one of my edits as it did not appear constructive to you. I would like to inform you that I am Nick's agent and he requested the change. Please refrain from such behavior. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.68.109 (talk) 23:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted an edit on the article for Mick Price (snooker player), not "Nick Price", to the remove the nickname "Rare teeth". When I googled "Mick Price" and "Rare teeth" together there were no hits. Also I recommend reviewing Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest with respect to your statement about being an agent fulfilling the request of the subject of the article. Pmokeefe (talk) 00:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TULIO CAPRILES MENDOZA

Hello, Mr. Pmokeefe. You have content untrue and misleading in the page TULIO CAPRILES MENDOZA. In addition, there are mostly false statements. We have already contanct Wiki in this matter. However, we use this communication to request you kindly remove all content from this page inmediatelly. Also, we request you stop writting under the name TULIO CAPRILES MENDOZA since some content is offensive and very harmfull to his personal image. In addition, this damages can easily be estimated in costs to business relations. However, Mr. Capriles has never been related either to any government agencies, office, officer nor has being ever an advisor for the public sector. Moreover, he has never attended UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA. And, he has never dedicated to create any newspapers outside his own. Being most of the content difamatory meaninfull, we strongly urge you to eliminate the space and request a public apology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.8.26.30 (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you are mistaken. I have not been writing under the name TULIO CAPRILES MENDOZA, in fact I reverted some vandalism done by User:Tulio Capriles Mendoza to that article. Pmokeefe (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i think you did not understand. Again, my name is Tulio Capriles Mendoza I am writing to you to inform you have content untrue and misleading in your page TULIO CAPRILES MENDOZA about myself. In addition, almost ALL are FALSE statements. We have already contanct Wiki in this matter.

However, we use this communication to request you kindly remove all content from this page inmediatelly. Also, we request you STOP writting under the name TULIO CAPRILES MENDOZA in this page. MOST of the content is offensive, politically sentitive and harmfull to MY personal image. In addition, this damages can easily be estimated in costs to business relations. However, Mr. Capriles has NEVER EVER been related either to any government agencies, office, officer nor has being ever an advisor for the public sector. It is a LIE!!!! Moreover, I have never attended UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA is untrue. And, I have never dedicated to create any newspapers outside his own this is CRAZY. Being most of the content DIFAMATORY and FAKE, I want it deleted.

The first message was written by a legal council and no by myself Tulio Capriles Mendoza. Please be responsible and forget the means you were ask to write all thes lies. I strongly urge you to eliminate the space and text.

I strongly request you delete all false information as soon as possible. I do not know your purpuse on writting this or who pay for that. However, I just want it delete all false statement.

Regards, Tulio Capriles Mendoza — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.14.209.201 (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I did not write anything about Tulio Capriles Mendoza, nor am I responsible for the overall content of that article, I merely reverted some apparent vandalism done to that article on one occasion. If you would like to pursue this matter further please refer to Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Dealing_with_articles_about_yourself, unfortunately I am not the right person to contact about this. Pmokeefe (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

privet

right hand is snake in orthodox christianity. i have given link. please allow.

ciao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.225.243.191 (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are referring to the article Right hand of God? I believe the edit that I reverted in that article did not cite any sources, by Wikipedia standards, sorry. Please check out Wikipedia:Citing sources.

Pmokeefe (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Box Hill School (Removal of content)

This is regarding the removal of information from the Box Hill School wiki, the reasoning for the removal was that the additions were not deemed to be "constructive". It would be most appreciated if you could expand upon this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.246.123.212 (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, my mistake. I restored your contributions. Thank you! Pmokeefe (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.246.123.212 (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Dukes of Abrantes

Hi Pmokeefe,

As the Consulate of Spain we are a government agency of Spain and request that you do not make changes to the Dukes name as entered. I can confirm the correct details have been entered and should not be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Consulateofspain (talk • contribs) 12:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Unpublished materials are not considered reliable. Wikipedia policy is that reliable, published sources are required. Pmokeefe (talk) 12:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Ruskin

Hi Pmokeefe, I think you made a mistake. I think it was a constructive link. What was your reasoning? User:Imogen_at_Leeds_Uni_Library —Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake, my apologies. I believe another editor caught the error and has already restored your contribution. Thank you! Pmokeefe (talk) 17:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. No worries! Imogen_at_Leeds_Uni_Library (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I seriously don't know what I am doing on Wikipedia! Do you have any recommendations of where I can post my ideas on another website? I was thinking of a blog, but I believe that won't take off as much as Wikipedia considering the traffic of the site. If you do recommend a blog, then maybe I am wrong about not having a high traffic website, I will then accept it as expertise from a blogger yourself!

Also, can my ideas get stolen on Wikipedia? I have my book posted for free on Wikipedia because I suck at formalities. I thought that Wikipedia had free editors of a book so that's why I got it reviewed. Again, don't know what I am doing. Hopefully you can clear things up! Joseph Walsh (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph Walsh,

Wikipedia articles are definitely the wrong place to post your original ideas, see Wikipedia:No original research policy.

A blog sounds like a great idea, you might try looking at this Wikipedia article for ideas on where to do that: Comparison of free blog hosting services.

Cheers!

Pmokeefe (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Stringer

My edits were made in good faith and I am sorry that you did not like them. — Preceding [[Wi kipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by 90.174.2.120 (talk) 19:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those edits do indeed appear fine, I'm not sure why they were rolled back. It appears that you have already reentered them. My apologies for the inconvenience.

Pmokeefe (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Kettle War

I added a casualties list to the page and it got taken down but I think my edit was kinda funny and factual considering that only casualty was a kettle. I would like to talk more about this issue Editman182638 (talk) 18:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You made a change the infobox of that article: see Help:Infobox . The particular infobox used in that article is this one: Template:Infobox military conflict. The parameters of an infobox including the casualties1 parameter which you changed, are used to help compare the facts across articles.

casualties1/casualties2 – optional – casualties suffered, including dead, wounded, missing, captured, and civilian deaths. Terms such as "dead" (or "killed"), "wounded", or "captured" should be used in place of abbreviations such as "KIA" or "POW".

Sorry, but I don't believe your contribution fits those guidelines.

Pmokeefe (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pooh the Bionic Cat

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/bionic-cat-named-pooh-history-bulgaria-article-1.2963529 http://www.dw.com/en/pooh-the-bionic-cat-gets-back-on-all-fours/a-37401955 http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/02/03/pooh-cat-gets-pair-bionic-legs-in-bulgaria.html

I saw this story the other day and Wikipedia doesn't seem to have anything. "Bionic cat" redirects to Oscar (bionic cat). You seem to have an interest in that article, so I was wondering what you think.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pmokeefe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pmokeefe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages

Hi Patrick. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any Wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.

Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).

All the best - T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 04:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]