User talk:Philip Howard

Welcome!

Hello Philip Howard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --TimPope 19:22, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much - and thanks for the Bod page too! --Philip Howard 19:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moszkowski

Hi. I've just caught up on your comment re the Moszkowski D major polonaise. Great to see there are other Moszkowski lovers out there. I think he's really at the front rank of the not-quite-famous composers from the Romnantic era. Cheers JackofOz 23:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Bolam

(I'm moving our discussion here, since talk pages are where how-to discussions and the like should go.)

The best place to find out about references is this page. Note that there is a difference between a reference and an external link, in terms of semantics. A reference directly supports a specific fact or statement within an article, and leads to a footnote. An external link is found in a separate section titled "External links," and may or may not directly support a fact or mention the article's subject. See also this page and this one for more about what makes a suitable reference. Post a message on my talk page if you need more help. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for thatPhilip Howard (talk) 15:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the 'original research' you removed from the Beethoven Piano Concerto Nº.3 article

I am surprised that my contribution was removed. Far from 'original research' I only posted that information after checking out a copy of the original 1992 article on Google books which I linked to in the references. That indicated that the cadenza in question had been found in a copy of the 3rd concerto held at Melk abbey and used for a performance there in 1827. Evidence in the score used for that performance indicated the cadenza found had been used at that performance. On those grounds I thought it appropriate to mention the cadenza in the article. Graham1973 (talk) 11:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BeethovenGate

I did not regard the removal as a personal attack, but I did feel it was a little hasty.

The idea of listing cadenza's sounds like a good one. Here is what I do know.

The article New Sources for Beethoven's Piano Concerto Cadenzas from Melk Abbey gives the known background and details of the Cadenza found at that location in 1989. The primary interest there is that while the author is unknown, it was found in a collection that included copies of cadenzas by Beethoven (for the fourth piano concerto) copied from his own papers (eg. the autographs). The article lists several other composers contemporary with Beethoven who wrote Cadenzas for the 3rd Piano Concerto, Ferdinand Ries, Carl Czerny & Freidrich Mockwitz. Only the Czerny cadenza could be located when the article was published in 1992. The Brahms cadenza was not added by myself and I have little information on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Graham1973 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peach

Thanks for catching that, I meant to tag the appearance section as a citation needed, in hopes that someone would expand it a bit with referenced material instead of the opinion of one author (although, I agree with the statement that they're sweeter/more fragrant etc, it still should be cited if that claim is going to be made) Regards, -- nsaum75 ^{!Dígame¡‎} 21:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ben Foster Publicity Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ben Foster Publicity Photo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]