User talk:Paulwade

License tagging for Image:Typical calif bungalow.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Typical calif bungalow.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Dryden house.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dryden house.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dryden house.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dryden house.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Angr 15:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image, Image:Hartleys north park.jpg

Just to let you know:

Image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission" which was either uploaded on or after May 19, 2005 or is not used in any articles, and which lacks a fair use assertion (CSD I3)

is a criteria for speedy deletion. The image, which you say you created, must be licenced under a free licence or qualify as fair use (which I don't think it does) or it will be deleted very soon. —Mets501 (talk) 03:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussion: Donald Covington

An article that you have been involved in editing, Donald Covington, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Covington. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gun club early warning.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gun club early warning.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn 15:19, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bill fox cd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bill fox cd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ryden les baxter album cover.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ryden les baxter album cover.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hart Crane.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hart Crane.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 00:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Hart Crane.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Hart Crane.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiant chains (talk) 01:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Scarling sweet heart dealer album cover.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Scarling sweet heart dealer album cover.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Typical calif bungalow.jpg

File:Typical calif bungalow.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Typical calif bungalow.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Typical calif bungalow.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Typical calif bungalow.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Typical calif bungalow.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Almas Temple

The article Almas Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not clear how this meets notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:41, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Thurston house.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Thurston house.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Marion peck.jpg

The file File:Marion peck.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scarling album cover 2.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scarling album cover 2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bill fox cd.jpg

The file File:Bill fox cd.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image of out-of-print album used on deleted article. Unlikely to be used elsewhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill fox cd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bill fox cd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the rights of this, so feel free to delete. Thank you. paulwade (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]