User talk:PatGanj

To leave us a message click here.

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from List of bus routes in London. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jeni ^(talk) 16:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Becambuisness (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DMacks (talk) 16:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PatGanj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

THIS IS NOT GOOD! PatGanj (talk) 19:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 19:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PatGanj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

THIS BLOCK IS NOT NECESSARY TO PREVENT DAMAGE OR DISRUPTION TO WIKIPEDIA;

         * THIS BLOCK IS NO LONGER NECESSARY BECAUSE THIS USER:
         #UNDERSTAND'S WHAT HE WAS BLOCKED FOR;
         #WILL NOT CONTINUE TO CAUSE DAMAGE OR DISRUPTION;
         #WILL MAKE USEFUL CONTRIBUTIONS INSTEAD.PatGanj (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2016 (UTC)}[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is blocked as a sockpuppet - you need to request unblock on your original account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.