User talk:MSLQr

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

This user does not mind criticism. Feel free to let them know if they did something wrong.

Reversion of reversion requested

Hello, over the past couple of days, I have made significant edits to the page Jeffrey Vitter, which is about my professional career, to address questions raised several months ago about needing supporting references for the statements on the page and a more factual tone. I made edits to handle those concerns and to make the page factual, accurate, and documented, as mentioned in the revision history notes. What was written on the page before you reverted it is factual. If there are particular concerns about any of the reverted facts on the page, please let me know. I would appreciate having the page returned to the state it was before your reverted it, as everything on it was accurate. Thank you for your time. JeffVitter (talk) 21:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a message at your talk page by an admin. Please see your talk page. Thanks. MSLQr (talk) 16:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the inclusion of the Prime Minister of India

If the reason to include the Prime Minister of Canada, is that he represents North America, that is perfectly fair. However, since there are three countries from Europe, that have been included, while there is only one from Asia. So, it has been duly amended. 112.134.218.58 (talk) 05:43, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buni

Sorry MSLQr, my edit summary at Buni was poor.
When faced with a list, such as those schools, some editors will just remove those without articles - which in this case would be all of them.
Others, including me, add wikilinks, sort the blues and reds, and add a clean-up list template above the redlinks. If they are still redlinks in say 6 months, or a year, I will then remove them with an edit summary like "Rm NN entries tagged since (date)". This allows time for editors to create articles, and (usually) avoids arguments when they are removed - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay, No, its okay. The edit summary was not poor at all. I never mind. I just preferred removing the links early per WP:NN, WP:ORGSIG and WP:REDNO rather than keeping the redlinks. Sometimes, redlinks lead to the creation of articles with no sources which got speedily deleted or the stuff remained left over for years on this encyclopedia. This also increases work for the other editors. Thanks for further clarification regarding the template. MSLQr (talk) 05:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	A barnstar for you!
	Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]