User talk:Neddihyllausiv

Welcome!

Hello, Neddihyllausiv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Riphouse 151: Could've Been's & Wanna Be's, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 01:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Riphouse 151: Could've Been's & Wanna Be's

The article Riphouse 151: Could've Been's & Wanna Be's has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable film whose top ten Google matches appear to be on Myspace and self-promotional pages.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 01:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Peter O'Brien"

A page you created, Peter O'Brien, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, you removed all content from the page or otherwise requested its deletion.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I have removed the speedy deletion template for this as I think you blanked the page in error. When you set up a redirect you must leave the redirect template on the original page otherwise Wikipedia does not know which page to redirect to. That said, if the reason for moving the page is simply because the actor shares his name with someone else, you do not necessarily need to set up a new page for the actor. You can set up a disambiguation on the page itself, like has been done at Rebecca Robinson (Neighbours) as there is already a Rebecca Robinson on Wikipedia. Also, if you're making a page about a filmmaker why not call it Peter O'Brien (filmmaker) instead of moving and renaming an entire article for it?

Also a tip for future, if moving a page or re-naming it, such things would normally be discussed on the articles talk page first as people may have objections --5 albert square (talk) 03:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter_O'Brien_(filmmaker)

I'm not sure this person is notable. Please fix the issues or the page risks being deleted. Bearian (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riphouse 151: Could've Been's & Wanna Be's for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riphouse 151: Could've Been's & Wanna Be's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riphouse 151: Could've Been's & Wanna Be's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{subst:proposed deletion notify|Peter O'Brien (filmmaker)|concern=No evidence of notability; WP:BLP unsourced for over a decade. I reached out to all past editors for help.}} Bearian (talk) 20:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]