User talk:Natureium/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Natureium. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
Your remark
It disappoints me that the apparent administration of this site perpetuates a fraudulent myth of a failed "self-made" businesswoman - being unwilling to call a fraudster what they are shows a disappointing amount of spinelessness; and calling my good-faith edit to reflect the reality of the person's status "vandalism" is callous to say the least. I would say shame on you, but you have none either way. Keep your article as is. 188.117.184.41 (talk) 05:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Natureium (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
I see your prod was removed :( Ping me if you AfD this mess, I agree it should be deleted. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
RFC
A request for sarcasm has been requested of you at List_of_oil_spills_impacting_penguins Praxidicae (talk) 18:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- OMG WTF is that? Natureium (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn
Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
A pie for you!
|
Thanks for the help over at Microorganism and the mess the socks created. Snowycats (talk) 01:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC) |
Why you not minding yours
You don’t have nothing better to do tf Gigoa2013 (talk) 03:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
IP threats of violence
It's a globally blocked abuser who has been making gross threats of violence. No matter how minor, they may not edit. That is why they're reverted. Acroterion (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Understood. It would be helpful if BMB was mentioned when reverting instead of just a generic reversion. Natureium (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. They're prolific and persistent, we're trying to bore them,. Acroterion (talk) 17:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
Source removal
I see you removed a meta-analysis paper from a few pages, namely PMID 24807747. I'm interested in the reason why. I would not have spotted it as a bad source. Ratel 🌼 (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- I removed it because the journal Urol J is garbage. Natureium (talk) 22:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, must agree, although the paper is probably not too bad. It's easy to read "Urol J" as "J Urol" which is where I erred. Ratel 🌼 (talk) 02:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Gene entries
Hello Natureium - have seen your entries on various gene pages and wondered if you could clarify - why some pages (most in my viewings) use the gene name for entry name and others use the protein - is there a hard and fast rule somewhere? What has prompted this is a move request for FUS (gene) to be changed to FUS protein. Am inclined to oppose this change but there are unusual cases where the protein is the entry name: DDIT3 has the protein as entry name but DDIT4 has the gene as entry. It would be good to have some ruling for consistency; this has caused confusion for me in the past. Many thanks --Iztwoz (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Iztwoz, there actually exists Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular Biology/Style guide (gene and protein articles), but it's only somewhat followed. From my observations, it seems that naming articles by gene name is more common. If I do move an article I tend to go by what is more commonly talked about. (ex. p53) In this case, the UniProt name is actually "RNA-binding protein FUS", so that's where it should be moved to if it were to be moved. Natureium (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you and thanks for the links! --Iztwoz (talk) 21:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Election
Why did you delete my discussion? WaltCip keeped attacking me. Have you ever heard of Bush v. Gore? The SCOTUS will rule this time too. It's not over yet. 2604:3D08:4E7F:F7E0:3519:78F6:8BB0:2F68 (talk) 03:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- You were disrupting productive discussion. If you want to continue to disagree with WaltCip, perhaps you could try his talk page. Natureium (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- But you did delete mine. WaltCip is the one who disrupted the discussion first. Why did you do nothing to him? But that's okay. I only care about the SCOTUS decision. 2604:3D08:4E7F:F7E0:3519:78F6:8BB0:2F68 (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- I agree that the way he phrased things was unnecessarily bellicose. If I had been reading when he said that, I probably would have reverted it as well. Natureium (talk) 04:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- But you did delete mine. WaltCip is the one who disrupted the discussion first. Why did you do nothing to him? But that's okay. I only care about the SCOTUS decision. 2604:3D08:4E7F:F7E0:3519:78F6:8BB0:2F68 (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Artificial heart valve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PMMA.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Sorry
Not only am I an idiot, but my first instinct seems to have been that you were an idiot. I'll go crawl back under my rock in shame. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- And it occurs to me now that my first comment could be taken as playing along, rather than thinking you were serious, and if I had just shut up no one would have known I was an idiot. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hahaha I did assume you were playing along. I was hoping that the title "threats of violence through the internet pipes" would make the exaggeration clear. However, am I the only one that noticed that the closer encouraged more violence in using the term "headhunting"? Natureium (talk) 17:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Be careful. User:Jehochman can be dangerous. I wouldn't put it past him to hunt heads. Whatever you do, don't ping him. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- I read it first (without the edit) and read Floq's reply seriously, then reloaded the page (with the edit) and assumed I'd just missed the small text the first time, and read Floq's reply as playing along. You really could have got away with that.
- I would just say though, hilarious or otherwise, joking about threats of violence and about emailing the emergency contact on ANI is just... probably not a great idea for the future. ~ mazca talk 17:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Be careful. User:Jehochman can be dangerous. I wouldn't put it past him to hunt heads. Whatever you do, don't ping him. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hahaha I did assume you were playing along. I was hoping that the title "threats of violence through the internet pipes" would make the exaggeration clear. However, am I the only one that noticed that the closer encouraged more violence in using the term "headhunting"? Natureium (talk) 17:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
That's enough! Into the pot, all of you. Jehochman Talk 17:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Omg, now people are being stewed on my talk page. It never ends. Natureium (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
A tool to locate "bad" sources
Are you using any tool to locate "bad" sources, that you can recommend? Maxim Masiutin (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Generally what I do is that I'll come across an article citing a predatory journal or an academic paper mill, and after removing it from that article I'll search the 'pedia for
insource:[journal name]and remove it from other articles, along with any improbable claims that it's linked to. Natureium (talk) 21:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)- Here is a list for if you're looking for what to look for. Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Questionable1 Natureium (talk) 21:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
- Awww, we voted next to each other! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Friends: Amory. Natureium (talk) 14:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Natureium,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
I left a message on User:CycoMa's talk page and assumed that would be the end of it. Asarelah (talk) 18:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
What’s going on here?CycoMa (talk) 18:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
Technical news
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
Arbitration
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
Administrator changes
- Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
Technical news
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
Arbitration
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamed tosuppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
Arbitration
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
This u?
[1] Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- No. Stalker. Natureium (talk) 00:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Administrator changes
- Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
- Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
Technical news
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Arbitration
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Natureium:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Nomination of List of people killed while running for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people killed while running until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello Natureium,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)