User talk:Suigetsu

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/September 2008#Suigetsu. SoxBot X (talk) 10:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suigetsu. You have new messages at WilliamH's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

September 2008

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Gintama a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A

Well Lee, nice to meet you. You already read what I think about those awesome rinnegan lenses :p Take care. Me. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 01:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW do you think Code geass is the worst shit ever existed? Keep up the godod work and I must see the rinne-lenses Cristian Cappiello (talk) 02:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In your opinion, Why do the "bad guys" must always lose on a shounen manga/anime? Why will there never be an anime or manga in which the bad guys actually beat the crap out of the good ones...definitely so they don't return. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 21:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To set an i.e.: The stoned motherfucker Aizen IS really awesome, he is far more powerful than those crappy captains and the fool Ichigo, but being the "bad guy" he is alreday doomed to be defeated... Cristian Cappiello (talk) 21:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man, he is really awesome, so that is why I want to see him fight before the end (of his part on the story). Amazingly enough, as I see him as a soft spoken intellectual it is hard to actually imagine him fighting, he always manages to defeat his enemies with one finger or soem other trick, look at renji (I hate that guy) or Ichigo (I would completely wipe him from his OWN story, lol). That is why before is he is defeated by Ichigo (oops, I spoiled you the end, shueisha is gonna initiate legal action :p) I MUST see his bankai. The ultimate irony would be that Kubo decides to end his plot without having shown us his bankai or even his TRUE motives (cut the I shall stand in heaven crap, that man's infancy must have been real hard); don't you agree? That would be really Aizen, lol. Regards. You know who.Cristian Cappiello (talk) 00:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe he does not even have one, maybe he does not even have the power to stop Ichigay's(that is how I shall adress the fucker from now on) bankai and all that happend was that he made all the others FEEL like he had stopped his bankai with a finger, maybe he even made komadog see and feel the hado 90 when actually nothing happened. I even dare to say that wonderweiss margera is a very elaborate illusion and that when it comes to true shinigami strength, he is really weak, his sword is what makes him SO cool.

What if he actually is a little green dwarf? lol. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Come again? I reallly did not got that one. The fool strongest of them all? And what was that about Zero division? Please explain yorself for I did not understand. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 02:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I knew about the Zeroth Division. What I was not aware was that Wonderweiss may have been the 0 espada. That raises yet another question: How will Aizen do to defeat the Zeroth division once he has vanquished the Gotei 13? Cristian Cappiello (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that the Zeroth is a match for stoned motherfucker-sama? By the way, one little thing, the fact that Hikifune is a captain and is the only known member does NOT mean ALL THE MEMBERS ARE captain, and I saw that somewhere on wiki. By the way, would not that mean that the captain of the Zeroth division would be by far the strongest shinigami? Please answer all my enquiries. Thank you. Take care,

Me. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 01:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any anime or manga that you saw/read and totally hated? Cristian Cappiello (talk) 17:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never read that one, and possibly never will also. If you had to choose, would you choose to read a manga or to watch an anime? What do you prefer? As for me, I totally hate ANY kind of sports manga/anime because it is an insult to the sport, I rather play them myself (I come form a country where football (or soccer when adressing an american such as yourself)is widely watched and played by people and I am no exception)

Take Care.

Me. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not you think there is a lot of prejudice against the "filler crap"? I mean, it is not like you instantly know a filler is going to be bad just because it is a filler you know. The new captain filler arc was quite good (cannot say the same about the first bount arc) and many people dogmatically refuse to see it just because it is a filler; for me, fillers are like fanfiction, reproductions of the original work by creative fans. It is not that ALL fillers are awful just because they carry that name. That's what I think. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 02:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B

Which is your favourite character of Bleach? What about Naruto? Mine are: Kaien Shiba dono and (well, actually the "bad kaien dono" or just aaroniero with kaien's face if you like)and Barragan; and Zabuza, Haku and Kimimmaro (and surely any other ninja of the mist)respectively. Take care.

Me. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 03:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo! Suigetsu-san, just a little thing, you see, I was doing maintenance on a couple of articles and I just want to know a little thing...respecting wikipedia's policies...are you also known as User:Snapper2?? Are you and him the same person? Because there where a couple of edits that were similar...it is obvious you both favor to delete (and I am a member of AIW,as my userbox says, lol) and there is quite the obsession with speculation. So...Are you Snapper2? If not, my deepest apologies for having doubted of you. If so, please be aware that it may not be allowed to have multiple accounts.

Anyways, take care.

Me. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 04:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh,my deepest apologies then. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Udagawa? Ahh, the whip guy, yes I remember. He was quite the interesting enemy, too bad no Bleach fighting games as of today feature filler characters. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 17:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides being a crazy motherfucker, Hidan is clearly a masochist, isn't he? I was discussing the character in some forum and I want the opinon of someone clearly more well versed on the subject. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, that man REALLY is weird, but is immortality is really something, I wonder how will the people at Cyber Connect 2 will mange to include him in any fighting game, given his unique ability....and by the way, have you noticed that new manga collaboration between Ohba and Obata? it's called Bakuman; I read it and I liked it. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, the cabal. Where can I find something like that or similar?

Cristian Cappiello (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LO, thank you, I shall serve the cabal with the best of my abilities. BTW, we never had this conversation :P Cristian Cappiello (talk) 17:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any idea on how to change the username? I am considring to change it to "Malcolm in the middle" or something like that (man, how I loved that tv show!...) because the seriousness of having my own name as username for 3 years has already bored me. Thank you. Take Care. Me.

Cristian Cappiello (talk) 22:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary information

Good God, do I need to enunciate for you? From WP:WEIGHT:

Undue weight applies to more than just viewpoints. Just as giving undue weight to a viewpoint is not neutral, so is giving undue weight to other verifiable and sourced statements. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements.

Reception information on individual characters is undue weight, and thus is excessive and unnecessary. The reception on the characters as a whole is an acceptable part of the article, is necessary per WEIGHT, and anything past that falls into undue weight. Stop your reverting. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 00:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing multiple edits

Hey, I recently saw your comments on the revision history of List of Bleach hollows and you really don't need rollback to undo a whole bunch of consecutive edits like that. You can do it using the radio buttons on the left side of the revision history page. You just have to choose the last consecutive edit you want to undo and the revision that you want to revert back to, using the radio buttons, then click "Compare Selected Versions". That should get you to a page that shows the changes between those two revisions, with an undo link on the right side of the page, above the account name or IP address of the guy who made the last reversion you selected, their edit summary, and a column detailing the changes. As long as there aren't any conflicting edits made after the one you selected, you should be able to undo it.

If this sounds a bit confusing, its because I can't really describe it in text that well, I guess. Feel free to hit me up on my talk page if I'm confusing you or if you have any questions. --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 04:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C

Ten? TEN???? ONLY TEN???

I hate the little brat and nothing would be better than seeing him defeated,He is far too arrogant and, truth be told, he does not have the power nor(is it correctly used here?)the skills to think that highly about himself. Also I believe his lieutenant will have a hard time taking those 3.

Hope hboth of them die. BTW, 100 bucks on Barragan and 200 on Oomaeda:P Take care. me. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 16:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

These comments were a violation of the Wikipedia policies on civility and personal attacks.[1][2] Please familiarize yourself with the policies and try to adopt a better standard of behavior, thanks. --El on ka 00:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You're blocked for a week for disruption, as both you and anonymously as your IP. You've had ample warning, and have already been blocked for the same before. krimpet ✽ 00:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suigetsu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The "disruption" in case is a civil conversation with Elonka over the civility of some other user in the recent Yannismarou ANI (I stated that I believed that the user,a self-proclaimed professor, should understand the basics of civility, to which Elonka responded with the NPA template), as well as a message of support left at a now-retired admin's talk page. After being an asshole to Yannis when I wasn't logged in, I noticed I was coming down on him too hard for something that wasn't entirely his fault, and added a new comment speaking to such. Krimpet takes this as a "good hand/bad hand routine," which to me seems like a pretty flimsy excuse for a block. I'm not sure that disagreeing with Elonka and doing a nice thing for once warrants a ban. If this gets declined (and for some reason, I know it will), I'd at least like permission to edit my user page.

Decline reason:

Logging out to harass another user is worth at least a month block in my book and would be upheld at ANI any day, Krimpet is being nice with only a week. And no userpage editing either, blocked users may only edit their talk page appropriately. — MBisanz ^talk 04:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suigetsu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Last one, since I don't want to abuse the unblock template, but I didn't exactly log out to harass someone. I was never logged in in the first place, and didn't think to log in -- I didn't deliberately not log in for the sole purpose of being a bastard to Yannis. To be blocked for a month for forgetting to log in is pathetic, but what's more is that I'm being blocked for attempting to right a wrong I made. I was an asshole to Yannis, realized it, and left a more encouraging message on his talk page, and even that was called a "personal attack."

Decline reason:

Since you requested a retired template below and stated you no longer want to be part of the Wikipedia project, I assume you no longer care to be unblocked. Tan | 39 06:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh, and could someone put the retired template at the top of my user page? These events have made it more than clear that Wikipedia is a community where I'm no longer welcome and no longer wish to be. Sui get su

D

Told ya 'bout Oomaeda, LOL. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 17:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YOU RETURNED THAT IS GREAT

oomaeda rules. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 20:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF????????

YOU LEAVE AGAIN????????????????????????? Cristian Cappiello (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E

Too bad he'll die by Shaolin Fong's bankai. Cristian Cappiello (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am SOOOOOOO glad the mother fucker scarcecrow finally dies, that way, Guy is sure to be the next hokage when the old fucker Tsunade dies Cristian Cappiello (talk) 03:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Suigetsu/Bleach

User:Suigetsu/Bleach, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Suigetsu/Bleach and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Suigetsu/Bleach during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 14:52, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]