User talk:Mooneyjc

Welcome!

Hello, Mooneyjc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 15 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Skolkovo Innovation Center page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Edwin P. Parker Jr.) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Edwin P. Parker Jr., Mooneyjc!

Wikipedia editor CaroleHenson just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your article about Edwin Parker. There were edits made to the article because Find a Grave is not a reliable source.

To reply, leave a comment on CaroleHenson's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Terence M. O'Rourke. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Don't invent categories, don't add categories that are already include din other categories, and don't add categories that don't apply. O'Rourke is not a piece of field artillery, he is not associated with Ramadi, and he is not a member of the New Hampshire Supreme Court. Meters (talk) 19:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mooneyjc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer necessary because I understand what I did wrong and I won’t do it again. I am just a casual user-contributor to Wikipedia and wasn’t very well-versed in all of the rules. I have contributed edits for a few years and I will make productive contributions again.

Decline reason:

CU results in the SPI confirmed. Portpaul was also certainly hanging out at your locale and sharing the same IP while editing the same article.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:03, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What did you do wrong? Your unblock request won't be considered unless you can explain what you did wrong and how you'll edit going forward. only (talk) 01:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made a bunch of edits to a page and instead of looking at them in “Preview” I looked at them in “publish.” It was disruptive. As to the sock puppet thing, the only other account I know of is jcmm7722. Mooneyjc (talk) 01:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]