User talk:VioletBrew

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, VioletBrew. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Moving articles

Please don't move articles from the scientific name to the vernacular name without first seeking consensus from other editors. Also we do not use fully capitalized vernacular names on the English Wikipedia (see MOS:LIFE), so even if a move were justified, it could not be to something like "Trout Lily Miner Bee"; it would have to be to "Trout lily miner bee". If you want to start a discussion on moving this particular article, do so at Talk:Andrena erythronii. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your buzzing contributions, :-). Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉]) 14:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:National general status working group in Canada has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National general status working group in Canada. Thanks! Perryprog (talk) 20:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National general status working group in Canada (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:

It took me literally 5 minutes just to load the tool to review this article! You have to significantly cut down the size. I suggest that you narrow the article down. This article is about the group, right? So is it really necessary to list seemingly every species in all of Canada? Please also read Perryprog's advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National general status working group in Canada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National general status working group in Canada, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 23:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VioletBrew! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 23:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:National general status working group in Canada has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National general status working group in Canada. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National general status working group in Canada (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at National general status working group in Canada. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Independent sourcing is still non-existent. The program itself doesn't have an article, but Species at Risk Act is a suitable target for merging to, IMO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National general status working group in Canada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National general status working group in Canada, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National general status working group in Canada

Hello, VioletBrew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National general status working group in Canada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]