User talk:MeanChe

Sean Faris Page

I probably sounded a bit snide on the Sean Faris page, but whether you know him or not, you're doing a fine job about keeping the page up, but don't be offended if things like links are deleted. I deleted those excess links because they're unneeded. I say, this because, some of your links included simple searches that members could do on their own. Yet, if you add fan sites (not biographical listings, or one page photo galleries) I know I won't delete them, and others won't either.

Keep on contributing!

---ACL- 17:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn to Manhattan

A tag has been placed on Brooklyn to Manhattan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Butseriouslyfolks 22:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Brooklyn to Manhattan

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Brooklyn to Manhattan, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0907625/. As a copyright violation, Brooklyn to Manhattan appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Brooklyn to Manhattan has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Brooklyn to Manhattan and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Brooklyn to Manhattan with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Brooklyn to Manhattan.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 22:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't keep posting this article that is copied from IMDB. It's contrary to Wikipedia policies and therefore considered vandalism. Thanks. --Butseriouslyfolks 05:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Get Some (2008 film)

Message posted on Sunday, June 3, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Get Some (2008 film). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1023111/ in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Get Some (2008 film) with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Get Some (2008 film) with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Get Some (2008 film) saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Butseriouslyfolks 05:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed this article and i am not sure whether the single sentence copied is infringing or fair use. However, Wikipedia has a rule, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, prohibiting articles on unreleased products, movies, etc. Best, --Shirahadasha 07:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Getsome3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Getsome3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Getsome3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Getsome3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn to Manhattan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brooklyn to Manhattan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Brooklyn to Manhattan. Ridernyc (talk) 00:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

It's no trouble. You can request a change at WP:CHU. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 13:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tamas Menyhart

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Tamas Menyhart, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tamas Menyhart

An editor has nominated Tamas Menyhart, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamas Menyhart and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tamasheadshot.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Tamasheadshot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BC Jean

Please stop removing the birth name of the singer. ~~It is irrelevant what name she wants to be known as.~~ This is an encyclopedia and it is fundamental that we list he birth info in addition to her stage name. Orane (talk) 05:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can prove her birth name is not factual, then there is no reason why it shouldn't be in the article. Please stop removing. Thankyou. --Richhoncho (talk) 05:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, her real name is listed here on the ASCAP official website. If she doesn't want to adhere to standard Wiki procedures, then it is possible that the article could be deleted altogether. I've read the e-mail that you showed me, and I've never come across an instance like this, so give me a moment to ask around. Orane (talk) 06:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, in accordance with [Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons]], it is possible that the article may stand as is, with the singer's name omitted. Orane (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Locked Discussion

No, it's not possible to lock a discussion or just some text on a page. It's the whole page or nothing. -Royalguard11(T) 21:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello MeanChe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jeff Judah - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twisted (2001 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twisted (2001 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted (2001 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:11, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of House Blend

The article House Blend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable unaired pilot that fails WP:TVSHOW notability guideline. Also, unsourced implying it fails WP:GNG as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]