User talk:Majash2020/Archives/2023/April

Archives

Draft:2022 Memphis 901 FC season

Hey Majash2020, Thanks for your review and input on 2022 Memphis 901 FC season. I was wondering if I could get some clarification on what is "confusing" about the page as well as what contributed to the your "essay" comment. This is my first large submission with plans to do more - so I just want to create a perfect "template" for season reviews. I understand that the submission is more complex than 2021 Memphis 901 FC season, but I did that on purpose to make it a more informative season review. I used 2022 Orlando City SC season as a example to build the 2022 Memphis page after. You can see that it matches a lot of the detail in the Orlando City page in stats and player detail. Just wanted to let you know where the page setup came from to see if it helps.

Like I said, please let me know what I can do to the page to avoid confusion and the essay note.

Trevor O Tivo15 (talk) 13:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Bwana Kheri

Hello Majash2020. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bwana Kheri, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: clearly claims significance. Generally speaking, people who are written about 100+ years after their death can be presumed sufficiently significant to pass A7. Thank you. So Why 08:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Peter Mark

Hi there Majash2020,

Thank you for reviewing a new submission on the opera conductor Peter Mark, I am a recent contributor to Wikipedia so thank you for bearing with me. Having created a new version with only the most factual and biographical of details, and that version being further rejected, I would value more targeted feedback on the offending sentences. With reference to your comment: Majority of the sources aren't independent sources about the topic, but are mostly passing mentions, I am interested in questioning this.

For example, there are several key biographical fact drawing from the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music - certainly independent and something I've used in my academic work on Music history for reference.

Peter's contributions in terms of performances are a matter for public record and have linked to the performance archives of the BBC, Metropolitan Opera, Virginia Opera, with cross reference to the performance archive of the Publisher of the Music Works in question.

Regarding the reference to details in the programme notes of Music Scores, for the ease of reading of the reader's behalf, I have linked to their existence on the Publisher's website, but each of these live in the fully published copies that have ISBN nos. Would amending them to the books rather than the website satisfy any of your issue with the entry?

I concede that there are two biographical points I am still looking to find electronic reference two, those being his professorship at the University of California and the RNCM, both which I know to be factual.

Otherwise, i see no reason why the content of this submission any different from similar entries on other opera conductors including Martyn Brabbins or Edward Gardner (conductor).

Thank you in advance for your clarification.

Twlebrocq (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: SMPTE ST 2067

Hi Majash2020,

Thanks for the second review on this draft. I've added several new references and citations in hopes the page will qualify for publication. As a newer contributor, is it permissible to ask for another re-review while this article is still fresh in your mind? If not, I can wait my turn again.

I will note that a closely related page I contributed, Interoperable Master Format (published), includes many of the same references and citations, and I hope this interconnection of topic pages can help get the 2067 draft across the finish line.

Any further suggestions to help qualify the article would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Lord Myric (talk) 01:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Submission declined

Hello, I'm referring the article "Junaid akram" which you recently declined due to lack of significant coverage. ARE YOU COMPLETELY SURE THAT YOU CHECKED ALL THE REFERENCES BY YOURSELF? Because you need to re-evaluate the references provided. I added all the news references from the top news sources in Pakistan. Robertglan (talk) 08:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow what Template:Music ratings says

Hello Majash2020. Per Template:Music ratings, do not use Template:Rating for publications that do not award stars. Please do not make automated edits like this where you remove the star rating for Gigwise, which gives a star rating out of 10, and add it for Kerrang!, which does not give a star rating and states at the bottom "4/5" with no stars in sight. You are directly going against what the template recommends doing, so please stop making these sorts of automated replacement edits until you fix the problem. Please go back through your recent edits and undo where you've replaced proper ratings with star templates. Thank you. Ss112 14:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Letting you know now, if you make any more of these automated replacement edits where you introduce the rating template for a site that doesn't use it or remove it where the website does, I will go to WP:AN because this is already taxing to revert. Ss112 14:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ss112, thanks for letting me know of this. I'll be removing the automated edits for the ratings and fixing my previous edits. Sorry for the inconvenience Majash2020 (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AWB incomplete

I appreciate that apparently there's some rule I don't know about where number ranges in album/song personnel sections should us –s instead of -s, sure. But it's happened multiple times (e.g. Special:Diff/1150818988 and Special:Diff/1150819246) that your edits have only gotten some of the -s and left behind others which other editors then have to fix the rest. I've never used AWB and don't know how exactly it works, but could you double-check these edits when you make them so that they're complete from now on? Doesn't make AWB look like a promising tool when it leaves incomplete work like this so often. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks QuietHere, that's an automatic task that AWB does so I will be keeping an eye on this from now on, and I'll fix the previous mistakes. Thanks Majash2020 (talk) 18:50, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]