User talk:Macaulay Nichol

Welcome!

Hello, Macaulay Nichol, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Macaulay Nichol, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you thru the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Macaulay Nichol

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Macaulay Nichol, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this deleted , I didn't advertise anything?? Macaulay Nichol (talk) 23:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this deleted

Why was this deleted Macaulay Nichol (talk) 23:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Macaulay Nichol

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Macaulay Nichol, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Macaulay Nichol. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. creffett (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jimmy

I have seen that I have been blocked.

I saw your reasoning, however I do have a couple of things I want to clear with yourself.

I have noted that I've only been blocked for a week and I would like to ask if after the week has ended will I be able to make the page again.

You see I am a bit hurt as I first had the idea to make the page, quite admittedly by myself, however I did agree with your policy it was quite biased to do that. Therefore, after consulting with friends from university, I asked a friend who studies journalism to make the Wikipedia page for me, it was indeed her literature on the page.

After it was denied, she attempted reaching out to the reviewer on my account and she had no response. Her work was just deleted, without any reason as to why. We attempted reaching out and finding out more about why it was deleted and how we may be able to improve it, but again no response.

Please between me and you you'll be able to state what improvements can made, whilst also not deleting it all, as I believe she spent a lot of time on that.

That's precisely what I was trying to ask. I wanted to ask the person reviewing the page, what they thought, how can it be improved, ext. I expected something constructive, not just a list for speedy deletion with absolutely minimal information as to why or what I can do to stop it.

Kind regards Macaulay Nichol (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I've got your name wrong, Macaulay Nichol (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was far too promotional, also articles on politicians are not usually accepted until they attain high office which in the UK would be an MP or Mayor of London or Birmingham. County councillors are not included unless they are unusually notable, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for getting back to me. Sorry for the inconvenience I may have caused, having you tell me precisely what was wrong was much more progressive as before hand I had absolutely no idea what was wrong. Thank again

Macaulay Nichol (talk) 01:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]