User talk:Mabalu/Archives/2014/December

Advice about edit summary wording

Hi Mabalu, I'm Breadbowlius, and I need some help about edit summaries. I thought my change to Wedding dress was a valid one. Then, I thought, since the change was reverted, perhaps my edit summary suggested otherwise. Could I have some advice about the type of wording for edit summaries, as to avoid future misunderstanding? Sorry, I'm awfully new to editing jargon.

Also, I was wondering if I could possibly redo my change, since there were (and now, are) two twin sections on Wedding dress, one of which I attempted to remove as it had a section with identical content directly after it. Breadbowlius (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

@Breadbowlius: OMG - I'm sorry! I hold up my hands - I made a mistake. You were absolutely right - it IS a duplicate section. I am so sorry about this, and apologise profusely. I can only say I must have not been reading carefully enough. Sorry again. You'd have been absolutely within your rights to rip me a new one. Mabalu (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh. Wow. That's a pretty big relief. Thanks a ton, Mabalu. Breadbowlius (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)