User talk:Prz4587ill

Welcome

Hello, Loveeterne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Prz4587ill. You have new messages at Bwilkins's talk page.
Message added 22:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 22:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Love eterne page.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Love eterne page.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Love Eterne (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Accolade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I removed the links. --Prz4587ill (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

You moved a page out of a userspace that wasn't your own. This is not allowed as the article still belongs to the user who has freely allowed editing to it. Unless this is your IP Address, I will move it back to the userspace until the user feels it is ready to be moved back to mainspace.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 12:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful with WP:OWN

Removing valid criticism as you did here might be a sign of an attempt to own an article. Negatives are as much of WP:NPOV as positive (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I put back.--Prz4587ill (talk) 15:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to check out my message up above. Are you this IP editor and if so, please confirm it or I will move the page back into userspace. Moving of pages into article space must be carried out by the user in possession of the article or by any user who has been granted permission to carry out the procedure should they not be able to do it themselves.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 15:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not an IP editor however isn't the title "Love Eterne (film)" more accurate than the previous one? The previous title was meaningless and wouldn't be helpful in the wiki.--Prz4587ill (talk) 15:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but, the problem is, the article you moved was located inside the IP Editor's userspace. You renamed an article w/o this permission. You also moved it out to mainspace which may make it open to speedy deletion.

Tip:start your comment with 1 more : than the preceding comment and sign on the same line as you comment.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 16:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm truly a super newbie at this but I'm learning from my mistakes and feedback. Thanks.--Prz4587ill (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will wait for a response from the IP editor. If no response or a speedy tag has been placed, I will relocate it back to the page it was originally located.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 17:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you leave it where it is Cyberpower. Comparing the last edit made by the IP editor with the current form, it's clear that Prz4587ill has written the bulk of the article. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 21:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 00:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Gill (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Gill (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Gill (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Best Shorts

The article Best Shorts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New 'virtual' award for movie shorts. No indication of importance. No Independent Reliable Sources found. Fails to meet criteria for organisations at WP:GNG and WP:ORG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bonniepiesse001.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bonniepiesse001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of the file and everything in it. What must I do resolve this issue?--Prz4587ill (talk) 15:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Love eterne poster 2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Love eterne poster 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of the file and everything in it. What must I do resolve this issue?--Prz4587ill (talk) 15:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Loveeterne003.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Loveeterne003.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of the file and everything in it. What must I do resolve this issue?--Prz4587ill (talk) 15:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Love eterne page.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Love eterne page.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(talk to me)} 04:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melissa Navia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melissa Navia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Navia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 23:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Melissa Navia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Melissa Navia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]