Jump to content

User talk:Pjetter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Londenp)

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 11:50, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Hi LondenP

[edit]

Because of the block on Wiki-NL, here my comment; I'm not laughing my ass off, as you suggested on the dutch wikipage. On the contrary, I didn't intend a whole blocking and anti-blocking procedure? In fact I didn't even mention your name, nor .Koens in my story. I oppose the abuse of power of moderators and others and have the right to do so. It's not me who kept the dutch Wikipedia one month free of geological articles, that was Siebrand. But I know I'll never persuade you. You and your power-loving mates try to build a fortress on the "ouwe-jongens-krentenbrood"group on Wiki-NL, supporting eachother and gossiping over obscure channels as IRC. Be so honest to say so, be the JeroenVrp or Troefkaart who want certain people excluded from "their" community. It's a bit strange however, that those two supply blocks to others who use phrases like "get off my page". Cheers, mate! Torero 22:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ik kon geen andere reden bedenken waarom je eerste edit meteen weer zo beledigend was; dus dan heb ik verkeerd gedacht. Torero, ik vind jouw discussietechniek slecht, maar ik zag je altijd wel als een intelligent iemand, daarom begrijp ik gewoon niet dat je op dezelfde voet doorgaat. Jouw discussie-aard zorgt ervoor dat mensen afscheid nemen van wikipedia, die de atmosfeer niet bevalt, daarnaast zijn er heel wat mensen die minder gemotiveerd zijn en dus minder edits hebben. Als je je nou eens zou veranderen en niet zo beledigend bent, zou je een waardevolle medewerker zijn (en gewaardeerd ook door mij). Echter ik denk dat die hoop zinloos is. Londenp 13:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record: you are the only one causing yourself to be banned. No one else. See my comment on your nl.wp talk page. Stick to creating an encyclopedia and stop insulting other users to be enabled to do what you say you would like to do. Siebrand 20:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Significant figures

[edit]

In most English-language countries, a comma (,) is a thousands separator, not a decimal point. So "12,300" is twelve thousand three hundred, and rounding to two significant figures is "12,000" not "12". --Calair 12:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right, I apologize. Another "problem" though is that with 12,300 (English) you can have 3, 4 or 5 or even more siginificant figures.Londenp 19:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seguir el pulso

[edit]

Dear Sir Dimtri Nikolaj, and Estimated mr. Londenp: I herewith like to really thank you for your helpfull support in the case of my recent astonishing blocking up from further editing again. In the mean time with best regards I remain faithfully yours: D.A. Borgdorff - e.i. MASc. by 86.83.155.44 (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guido den Broeder

[edit]

A discussion of Guido den Broeder's conduct and status as an editor has begun at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Improper_use_of_MfD_page.3F

I've alerted you since you are on his "respected user" list WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 02:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Pjetter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pjetter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]